green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jackson
But see United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 376 (10th Cir.1986) (applying harmless error analysis, yet putting burden on defendant to establish burden was prejudicial), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jackson
But see United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 376 (10th Cir.1986) (applying harmless error analysis, yet putting burden on defendant to establish burden was prejudicial), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Hector Cruz-Jiminez
But see United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 378 (10th Cir.1986) (declining to follow Sims and applying instead general abuse of discretion standard), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); United States v. Wyman, 724 F.2d 684 , 686 n. 3 (8th Cir.1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Carapellucci v. Town of Winchester
But cf. Thompson v. Olson, 798 F.2d 552, 558 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987) (stressing the lack of maliciousness in finding that police conduct does not meet the shocks-the-conscience standard).
cited
Cited "see"
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC. v. Torchmark Corp.
See United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 381 (10th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Teligent, Inc.
Oct.29, 1996); see Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 107 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); Eutectic Corp. v. Metco, Inc., 597 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.1979)(“The limitation on the use of Rule 60 motions as a substitute for appeal is especially true of motions under Rule 60(b)(6).”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gianetta
See United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 376 (10th Cir.1986) (discussing request for expert under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(1)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 (1987). 16 In this case, the third factor is dispositive because Mr. Gianetta has not demonstrated that testing of the shirt would have any value whatsoever.
discussed
Cited "see"
Endicott Johnson Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
This requirement is “ ‘mandatory and jurisdictional.’ ” Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 61 , 103 S.Ct. 400, 403 , 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) (per curiam) (quoting Browder v. Director, Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. *56 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 561 , 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978)); see Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 104 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); In re Cosmopolitan Aviation Corp., 763 F.2d 507, 514 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1032 , 106 S.Ct. 593 , 88 L.Ed.2d 573 (1985); Stirling v. Chemical Bank, 511 F.2d …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Derek Edward Benedict
See United States v. Wheeler, 802 F.2d 778, 781 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Derek Benedict
See United States v. Wheeler, 802 F.2d 778, 781 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred M. Anderson v. United States
See Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1986) (Rule 60(b)(6) relief available in extraordinary circumstances), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 (1987). 3 For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward v. Lawrence v. Bill M. Armontrout
See Cuevas v. Henderson, 801 F.2d 586, 592 (2d Cir.1986) (“the evidence of identification ... was so strong and substantial and the alibi evidence so insubstantial” that the Strickland prejudice standard was not met), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricky Vernon Nichols
United States v. Moss, 544 F.2d 954, 961 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 822 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 (1977); see United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 376 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987). 1 *1018 In requesting a court-appointed expert, the burden is on the defendant to show that “such services are necessary to an adequate defense.” Greschner, 802 F.2d at 376 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy White
See United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 380 (10th Cir.1986) (applying plain error standard where defendant failed to object to the presence of government attorneys at hearing on § 3006A(e) motion for appointment of penologist), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908, 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Pofahl
See United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 380 (10th Cir. 1986) (applying plain error standard where defendant failed to object to the presence of government attorneys at hearing on § 3006A(e) motion for appointment of penologist), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S. Ct. 1353 , 94 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Adler v. Berg Harmon Associates
See Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Hutton Group
See Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Medicare&medicaid Gu 38,982 United States of America v. Billie M. Kline
See United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 380 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Fournier v. Joyce
See Thompson v. Olson, 798 F.2d 552 (1st Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
S.R. Mercantile Corporation v. Andrew Maloney v. Harold Wapnick
See Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 105 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Gladney v. Southern Railway Company, and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
See Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106-07 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 (1987); United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312-13 (4th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonino Aiello
See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord Cuevas v. Henderson, 801 F.2d 586, 589 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987); United States v. Cruz, 785 F.2d 399, 405 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smedley
See Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 104-05 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); DeRango v. United States, 864 F.2d 520, 522 (7th Cir.1988); Silvia v. Laurie, 594 F.2d 892, 893 (1st Cir.1979); Elmore v. Henderson, 1989 WL 88721 , 1989 U.S. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Krause v. R.O. Bennett, Jr.
(2×)
See Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 105 (2d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 381 (10th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); United States v. Metzger, 778 F.2d 1195, 1209 (6th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 477 U.S. 906 , 106 S.Ct. 3279 , 91 L.Ed.2d 568 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 381 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); United States v. Metzger, 778 F.2d 1195, 1209 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 906 , 106 S.Ct. 3279 , 91 L.Ed.2d 568 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
David v. Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc.
See Matarese v. Le-Fevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); 11 C.A.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. v. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
See, e.g., Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendes Junior International Company v. Banco Do Brasil, S.A. And Bb Leasing Company
Pursuant to FRAP Rule 4(a)(5), a district court may, on a showing of good cause or excusable neglect, extend the appeal period for up to 30 days from the original deadline or until 10 days after the date of entry of the order granting the motion, whichever is later; but the court may not extend this grace period further, for that Rule also provides that [n]o extension under this Rule 4(a)(5) may exceed 30 days after the prescribed time or 10 days after the date when the order granting the motion [for extension of time] is entered, whichever is later, Rule 4(a)(5)(C); see, e.g., Matarese v. LeF…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franza v. Stinson
See, e.g., Cuevas v. Henderson, 801 F.2d 586, 592 (2d Cir.1986) (where prosecution’s summation was appropriate, counsel’s failure to object did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987); Duncan v. Griener, 97 Civ. 8754, 1999 WL 20890 at *10 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
That's Entertainment, Inc. v. Club Images, Inc.
See also Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 107 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. Hawk
See, e.g., United States v. Nersesixm, 824 F.2d 1294, 1321 (2d Cir.) (“[T]he decision whether to make an opening statement and when to make it is ordinarily a matter of trial tactics and strategy which will not constitute the incompetence basis for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel____ By waiving opening argument the defense did not commit itself to a particular position and was thus free to develop any defense that might materialize as the prosecution presented its case.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 958 , 108 S.Ct. 357 , 98 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987); United States v. Salovitz, 701 F.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. Daka International, Inc.
However, subpart (6) is properly invoked only “where there are extraordinary circumstances!,] where the judgment may work an extreme and undue hardship,” DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 38 F.3d 1266, 1272 (2d Cir.1994), and where the asserted grounds for relief “are not recognized in clauses (1) — (5) of the Rule.” Nemaizer v. Baker, 793 F.2d 58, 63 (2d Cir.1986); see also Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 107 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908, 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel H. McMahon Jr.
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 375 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that Rule 615 prohibits discussion of the ease between witnesses), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 650 F.2d 1365, 1373 (5th Cir.1981) (holding that Rule 615 prohibits the reading of trial -transcripts).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McMahon
See e.g., United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 375 (10th Cir. 1986) (holding that Rule 615 prohibits discussion of the case between wit- nesses), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 (1987); Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 650 F.2d 1365, 1373 (5th Cir. 1981) (holding that Rule 615 prohibits the reading of trial transcripts).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campos v. United States
Applying the Strickland standard, courts have required a petitioner to “demonstrate that his counsel committed errors so serious that he was not functioning as counsel within the meaning of the Sixth Amendment and that counsel’s performance was so deficient that he was deprived of a fair trial.” Foy v. United States, 838 F.Supp. 38, 43 (E.D.N.Y.1993); see also Cuevas v. Henderson, 801 F.2d 586, 589 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Theodore S. Bledsoe v. Gary Stotts, Nadine K. Belk, Theodore S. Bledsoe v. Louis E. Bruce, Steven J. Davies
See, e.g., United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 378 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gonzalez v. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc.
See also Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 107 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerda Dorothea Deweerth v. Edith Marks Baldinger, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
A “district court’s grant or denial of relief under Rule 60(b), unless rooted in an error of law, may be reversed only for abuse of discretion.” Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, 841 F.2d 1133, 1138 (D.C.Cir.1988); see also Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 107 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Bradley Klinginsmith
See United States v. Buchanan, 787 F.2d 477, 485 (10th Cir.1986) (even if a sequestration order is violated, the defendant must still show that probable prejudice resulted from the violation); see also United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 376 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edgar Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edward W. Welch, Jr., United States of America v. Arline S. Welch, United States of America v. Kevin Cullinane, United States of America v. Cheryl T. Johnson, United States of America v. Richard F. Labrie, United States of America v. Tony Rood, United States of America v. William D. Wallace, United States of America v. Ernest F. Langlois
See, e.g., R.I.R.Evid. 615 10 Citing United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987), appellants postulate that Rule 615 requires sequestration beyond the courtroom door.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Speaks v. United States
See also United States v. Wheeler, 802 F.2d 778, 781 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Music Deli & Groceries, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
Id..; see also Matarese v. Le Fevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106-07 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); United States v. Cirami, 563 F.2d 26 (2d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Amable Garcia, Miguel Cabrera, Jose Domingo, Carlos Reinoso, Jose Dominguez, A/K/A \Jose Domingo\"
Thus, where a defendant testifies on direct examination regarding a specific fact, the prosecution may prove on cross-examination “ ‘that [the defendant] lied as to that fact.’ ” United States v. Garcia, 900 F.2d 571, 575 (2d Cir.) (citation omitted) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 169 , 112 L.Ed.2d 133 (1990); see also United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373 , 383 *654 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); United States v. Bufalino, 683 F.2d 639, 647 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1104 , 103 S.Ct. 72…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Urlacher
See also, United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373, 379-80 (10th Cir.1986) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1986); United States v. Gordon, 634 F.2d 639 , 646 n. 2 (1st Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Landano v. Rafferty
See, e.g., Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James E. Galloway, A/K/A Dean
See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1976); see also Nelson v. Solem, 795 F.2d 636 (8th Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 (1987). 3 Appellant's next contention is that the evidence was insufficient as to Count II, which charged him with one "crack" transaction in March of 1988.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
See also Matarese v. LeFevre, 801 F.2d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1986) (Rule 60(b)(6) properly invoked in cases of extraordinary circumstances or extreme and undue hardship) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1353 , 94 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); United States v. Cirami, 563 F.2d 26, 32 (2d Cir.1977) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bruce Anderson v. Norman Butler
(2×)
See, e.g., Cuevas v. Henderson, 801 F.2d 586 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 1354 , 94 L.Ed.2d 524 (1987); Martin v. McCotter, 796 F.2d 813 (5th Cir.1986); Krist v. Foltz, 804 F.2d 944 (6th Cir.1986); U.S. ex rel Smith v. Lane, 794 F.2d 287 (7th Cir.1986); Campbell v. Lockhart, 789 F.2d 644 (8th Cir.1986); Woratzeck v. Ricketts, 820 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir.1987); Thompson v. Wainwright, 784 F.2d 1103 (11th Cir.1986). 40 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Greschner
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-5926.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1987.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.