green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property Located at 101 North Liberty Street & 105 Liberty Street in Clanton
See United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646 (2nd Cir.1986), cert. denied 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allstate Insurance Company v. Mark Burrough, Garnette Bell, Individually and as Next Friend of Kenyatta Williams
(2×)
See Enterprise Tools, Inc. & E.B. v. Export-Import Bank, 799 F.2d 437, 442 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1569 , 94 L.Ed.2d 761 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Garnette Bell
See Enterprise Tools, Inc. & E.B. v. Export-Import Bank, 799 F.2d 437, 442 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Bennett Tanner
See United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646, 647 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1347 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.
See United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646, 647-48 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mancuso
See United States v. Rafsky, 803 F.2d 105, 107-108 (3d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); United States v. Bonnett, 877 F.2d 1450, 1453-1454 (10th Cir.1989) (mail and wire fraud statutes make the same distinction as Section 1344 between schemes to defraud and schemes to obtain property by false or fraudulent pretenses).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One Sharp Photocopier
Id.; see United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646, 647 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); United States v. $152,160.00 United States Currency, 680 F.Supp. 354, 356 (D.Colo. 1988).- Once the government establishes probable cause, the burden in forfeiture proceedings shifts to the claimant.
cited
Cited "see"
Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
See Enterprise Tools, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank of U.S., 799 F.2d 437 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1569 , 94 L.Ed.2d 761 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carter v. Utah Power & Light Co.
(2×)
See United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied sub. nom Tribune Co. v. United States, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 805 F.2d 1, 12 (1st Cir.1986); In re San Juan Star Co., 662 F.2d 108, 115 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. All Right, Title & Interest in Real Property & Building Known as 303 West 116th Street
See United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646, 647 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987) (acquittal in criminal forfeiture proceeding does not bar later civil forfeiture proceeding); United States v. $152,160.00 United States Currency, 680 F.Supp. 354, 356 (D.Colo.1988) (“a criminal conviction is not prerequisite to a civil forfeiture proceeding”); United States v. One 1977 Lincoln Mark V, Señal No. 7Y89A832686, 453 F.Supp. 1388, 1391 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (claimant’s acquittal at trial does not preclude civil forfeiture proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
See United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646, 647 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987) (acquittal in criminal forfeiture proceeding does not bar later civil forfeiture proceeding); United States v. $152,160.00 United States Currency, 680 F.Supp. 354, 356 (D.Colo.1988) ("a criminal conviction is not prerequisite to a civil forfeiture proceeding"); United States v. One 1977 Lincoln Mark V, Serial No. 7Y89A832686, 453 F.Supp. 1388, 1391 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (claimant's acquittal at trial does not preclude civil forfeiture proceeding). 22 Nor does it matter that …
discussed
Cited "see"
Certain Interested Individuals, John Does I-V, Who Are Employees Of Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation, v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company
See United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441-42 (11th Cir.1986) (newspaper not entitled to view document describing possible similar acts evidence or list of persons named in bill of particulars as unindicted co-conspirators), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); United States v. Smith, 776 F.2d 1104, 1112-15 (3d Cir.1985) (list of unindicted conspirators sealed). 36 In sum, we think the pre-indictment status of the government's criminal investigation tips the balance decisively in favor of the privacy interests and against disclosure of even the redacted …
discussed
Cited "see"
Certain Interested Individuals, John Does I-V, Who Are Employees of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.
See United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441-42 (11th Cir.1986) (newspaper not entitled to view document describing possible similar acts evidence or list of persons named in bill of particulars as unindicted co-conspirators), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); United States v. Smith, 776 F.2d 1104, 1112-15 (3d Cir.1985) (list of unindicted conspirators sealed).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. 316 Units of Municipal Securities in the Name of Efrain Gonzalez
The Court further *176 clarified that “neither collateral estoppel nor double jeopardy bars a civil, remedial forfeiture proceeding initiated following an acquittal on related criminal charges.” Id. at 361 , 104 S.Ct. at 1104 ; see United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646, 649 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); United States v. One 1986 Mercedes Benz, 660 F.Supp. 410, 414 (S.D.N.Y.1987), aff'd, 846 F.2d 2 (2d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
League of United Latin American Citizens, Council 4434 v. William P. Clements, Governor of the State of Texas v. Midland County, Texas, Etc., Movants-Appellants
See Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc., 684 F.2d 324, 330-31 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 759 (1987). 21 The judgment of the district court denying intervention of right is AFFIRMED; in all other respects the appeal is DISMISSED. 1 State defendants-appellees filed a brief arguing that it is beyond Midland's authority to represent the interest of Texas district judges in their official capacities.
cited
Cited "see"
League of United Latin American Citizens, Council 4434 v. Clements
See Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc., 684 F.2d 324, 330-31 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 759 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury Directed to Custodian of Records, University of Florida Athletic Program. The Gainesville Sun Publishing Corporation, the Tribune Company, Campus Communications, Inc., and the University of Florida Chapter of Sigma Delta Chi, Intervenors-Appellants
See United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1440 (11th Cir.1986) (public and press not entitled to hearing on whether discovery document in civil trial should be sealed absent right to view material), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury Directed to Custodian of Records
See United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1440 (11th Cir.1986) (public and press not entitled to hearing on whether discovery document in civil trial should be sealed absent right to view material), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez Rosado v. Syntex (F.P.), Inc.
See ReMine & Gilbert, Discovery: Abuses, Sanctions and Ethical Concerns, 23 Trial, 53-57 (Jan 1987); see also, Jaffe v. Grant, 793 F.2d 1182, 1189 (11th Cir. 1986), cert denied, 480 U.S. 931 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allen
Compare Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567 , 108 S.Ct. 1975 , 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988), and United States v. Fagan, 28 MJ 64 (CMA), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 823 , 110 S.Ct. 83 , 107 L.Ed.2d 48 (1989), with Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. ---, 111 S.Ct. 2382 , 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991), and United States v. Scott, 22 MJ 297 (CMA 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 759 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bruce Norton and Linda Norton, Husband and Wife v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
(2×)
Co., 276 Ark. 58 , 632 S.W.2d 420, 421 (1982); see also Enterprise Tools, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank, 799 F.2d 437, 439 (8th Cir.1986) (whether insurance contract is ambiguous is a question of law), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1569 , 94 L.Ed.2d 761 (1987). 7 In general, we accord substantial deference to a district court's interpretation of the law of the state in which it sits.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nancy Melody
See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 802 F.2d 712 (4th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1568 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987) (holding that Rule 35(b)’s time limit is absolute, regardless of whether the motion for reduction of sentence is framed under Rule 35(b) or 18 U.S.C. § 3651 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DeGroote
See also United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438 , 1442 n. 5 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1567 , 94 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rafsky
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-1063.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1987.
480 U.S. 931
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.