green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Davis.
See United States v. Wilmer, 799 F.2d 495 (9th Cir. 1986), cert denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1626 , 95 L.Ed.2d 200 (1987) (holding that a calibration report of a breathalyzer operator is a routine, objective report admissible under Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 803(8)(B)); see also United States v. Wilkinson, 804 F.Supp. 263 (D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Thomas
(2×)
See United States v. Montgomery , 819 F.2d 847 , 851 (8th Cir. 1987) (no prima facie case where the Government (1) accepted a jury that included two blacks; (2) could have used its remaining peremptory challenges to strike these remaining blacks; and (3) did not attempt to exclude all blacks (or as many blacks as it could); accord United States v. Ratcliff , 806 F.2d 1253 , 1256 (5th Cir. 1986) (although one black was struck, two blacks remained on jury), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1625 , 95 L.Ed.2d 199 (1987); United States v. Dennis , 804 F.2d 1208 , 1210-11 (11th Cir. 1986) (th…
cited
Cited "see"
Heglemeier v. State
See United States v. Wilmer, 799 F.2d 495, 501 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
In DEFENSE OF ANIMALS v. Cleveland Metroparks Zoo
See International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research, Inc., 799 F.2d 934, 940 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1624 , 95 L.Ed.2d 198 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen W. Bentson
See United States v. Wilmer, 799 F.2d 495, 502 (9th Cir.1986) (attorney’s statement during oral argument constitutes judicial admission), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1626 , 95 L.Ed.2d 200 (1987); MagallanesDamian v. INS, 783 F.2d 931 , 934 (9th Cir.1986) (deportation case) (absent egregious circumstances, parties are generally bound by admission of attorney); 9 John Henry Wigmore, Evidence §§ 2588, 2594 (James H.
cited
Cited "see"
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Yeutter
See International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research, Inc., 799 F.2d 934, 940 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1624 , 95 L.Ed.2d 198 (1987). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Woods v. State
See *940 U.S. v. Ratcliff, 806 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1625 , 95 L.Ed.2d 199 (1987); Ivatury v. State, 792 S.W.2d 845 (Tex.App.1990, pet. pending).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, and National Institutes of Health
See International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research, Inc., 799 F.2d 934 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1624 , 95 L.Ed.2d 198 (1987) [hereinafter Primate Protection ].
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marks
See United States v. DeSha, 23 MJ 66 (CMA 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1626 , 95 L.Ed.2d 200 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael Chinchilla and Carlos Alberto Escobar
(2×)
See United States v. Montgomery, 819 F.2d 847, 851 (8th Cir.1987) (no prima facie case where the government (1) accepted a'jury which included two blacks; (2) could have used its remaining peremptory challenges to strike- these remaining blacks; and (3) did not attempt to exclude till blacks, (or as many blacks as it could); accord United States v. Ratcliff, 806 F.2d 1253, 1256 (5th Cir.1986) (although one black struck, two blacks remained on jury), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1625 , 95 L.Ed.2d 199 (1987); United States v. Dennis, 804 F.2d 1208, 1210-11 (11th Cir.1986) (three black…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zimmerman v. Wolff
See e.g., International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research, Inc., 799 F.2d 934, 940 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1624 , 95 L.Ed.2d 198 (1987); Ing v. American Airlines, 2007 WL 420249 , at *4 (N.D.Cal.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Derrick v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety
See also, U.S. v. Wilmer, 799 F.2d 495, 501 (9th Cir.(Wash.) 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1626 , 95 L.Ed.2d 200 (1987); 6 U.S. v. DeWater, 846 F.2d 528, 529 (9th Cir.(Haw.) 1988); 7 U.S. v. Wilkinson, 804 F.Supp. 263, 266-267 (D.C.Utah 1992); 8 Frost v. North Dakota Department of Transportation, 487 N.W.2d 6, 11 (N.D.1992). 9 State here asserts the law presumes that the persons in charge of maintaining public records perform their required duties without motivation to misrepresent the facts, and that public records consequently enjoy a presumption of trustworthiness.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ruiz
See, e.g., United States v. Wilmer, 799 F.2d 495, 501-02 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1626 , 95 L.Ed.2d 200 (1987); State v. Huggins, 659 P.2d 613, 616 (Alaska Ct.App.1982); State v. Jensen, 351 N.W.2d 29, 32-33 (Minn.Ct.App.1984); State v. Conway, 70 Or.App. 721 , 690 P.2d 1128, 1129 (1984), review denied, 298 Or. 704 , 695 P.2d 1371 (1985); cf. State v. King, 187 Conn. 292 , 445 A.2d 901, 909-12 (1982) (toxicology tests); State v. Van Sickle, 120 Idaho 99 , 813 P.2d 910, 913-14 (1991) (breathalyzer printout).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Christian
See United States v. Quezada, 754 F.2d 1190, 1193-94 (5th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Wilmer, 799 F.2d 495, 500-01 (9th Cir.1986) (citing United States v. Hernandez-Rojas, 617 F.2d 533, 534-35 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 864 , 101 S.Ct. 170 , 66 L.Ed.2d 81 (1980)), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1626 , 95 L.Ed.2d 200 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vernell Wigglesworth v. State of Oregon
Compare United States v. Wilmer, 799 F.2d 495, 501 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1626 , 95 L.Ed.2d 200 (1987) (calibration report of a breathalizer operator held to be a routine, objective report admissible under the public records and reports exception to the hearsay rule, Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)(B)), and United States v. Gilbert, 774 F.2d 962, 965 (9th Cir.1985) (statement on card that fingerprint had been “lifted” from statue admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)(B) — “The routine act of-reporting a latent print on an object is no different from inventorying items…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jean Dehainaut v. Federico Pena
The Supreme Court has defined a bill of attainder as “a law that legislatively determines guilt and inflicts punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial.” Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research, 468 U.S. 841, 846-47 , 104 S.Ct. 3348, 3351-52 , 82 L.Ed.2d 632 (1984); see also Schellong v. I.N.S., 805 F.2d 655, 662 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1624 , 95 L.Ed.2d 199 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Konrads Kalejs v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See also Schellong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 805 F.2d 655, 660, 662 (7th Cir.1986), certiorari denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1624 , 95 L.Ed.2d 199 ; United States v. Kairys, 782 F.2d 1374 , 1377 n. 3 (7th Cir.1986), certiorari denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 . 13 According to testimony, Kalejs was not "merely" a guard at a concentration camp but the commander of such guards.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Spivey
The ACA “ ‘incorporates into federal law only the criminal laws of the jurisdiction within which the enclave exists; it is, itself, a penal statute.’ ” U.S. v. Carlson, 900 F.2d 1346, 1347 (quoting United States v. Best, 573 F.2d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir.1978)) (emphasis in original). 2 Although “a state’s penal laws [should] be uniformly applied to citizens on and off federal enclaves,” United States v. Marcyes, 557 F.2d 1361, 1364-65 (9th Cir.1977), “[t]he [ACA] incorporates state substantive criminal law as federal substantive law ... [but] does not generally adopt state procedur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hernandez
Davis v. State, 560 So.2d 1346, 1347 (Fla.App.1990) (proper to strike prospective juror who fell asleep during voir dire); People v. Harris, 129 Ill.2d 123, 175 , 135 Ill.Dec. 861 , 884, 544 N.E.2d 357, 380 (1989) (sickly and disabled juror dismissed because prosecutor feared she would be unable to pay attention throughout trial); see also United States v. Ratcliff, 806 F.2d 1253, 1256 (5th Cir.1986) (prospective juror who fell asleep during voir dire, had prior Internal Revenue problem, and who had taught tax preparation classes properly struck), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1625 ,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gregory Carnill v. United States
See also United States v. Azad, 809 F.2d 291 (6th Cir.1986) (reciting the details of the fraud scheme), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C----E----J v. State
See, e.g., U.S. v. Ratcliff, 806 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1625 , 95 L.Ed.2d 199 (1987) (use of peremptory challenge against a black female who slept during jury selection); People v. Moss, 188 Cal.App.3d 268 , 233 Cal.Rptr. 153 (1986) (peremptory challenge allowed for inattentiveness because, among other things, the juror was reading a newspaper during voir dire).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C_ E_ J v. State
See, e.g., U.S. v. Ratcliff, 806 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 , 107 S.Ct. 1625 , 95 L.Ed.2d 199 (1987) (use of peremptory challenge against a black female who slept during jury selection); People v. Moss, 188 Cal.App.3d 268 , 233 Cal.Rptr. 153 (1986) (peremptory challenge allowed for inattentiveness because, among other things, the juror was reading a newspaper during voir dire).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Primate Protection League
v.
Institute for Behavioral Research, Inc.
v.
Institute for Behavioral Research, Inc.
No. 86-1155.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1987.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.