green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Saunders
(2×)
See Khorrami, 895 F.2d at 1192 -93 (quoting United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 708 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1627 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles W. Blackburn
See United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 708 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1627 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jean Pierre Deandino
See United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 707 (7th Cir.1986) (government must establish that a “true threat” was made under such circumstances wherein a reasonable person would perceive that the statement would be interpreted as a threat), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1627 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis A. Kosma
See United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 712 (7th Cir.1986) (“The immediate response of the [White House] mail-room employee and the Secret Service to the content of [defendant’s] letter is clear evidence of the seriousness the recipients of the letter attached to the expression of the intent to harm the President.”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1627 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene B. Cameron
Portions of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976, are specifically exempted from the Lacey Act. 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1882 ; see United States v. Doubleday, 804 F.2d 1091 (9th Cir.1986) (violations regulated by a Magnuson Fishery Management Plan are not subject to prosecution under the Lacey Act), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1628 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Box v. Petsock
See United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 710 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1627 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987), reh’g denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 2205 , 95 L.Ed.2d 859 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leroy Johnson, Jr.
See United States v. Patillo, 431 F.2d 293, 297-98 (4th Cir.1970) (threat against President uttered without communication to President can form basis for conviction under § 871 “only if made with a present intention to do injury to the President”), adhered to, 438 F.2d 13, 16 (4th Cir.1971) (in banc) (“an essential element of guilt is a present intention either to injure the President, or incite others to injure him, or to restrict his movements”); see also United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 707, 712 (7th Cir.1986) (ambiguous indication that Seventh Circuit may require proof that…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Victor TEICHER, Victor Teicher & Co., L.P. and Ross Frankel, Defendants-Appellants
R.Evid. 610, advisory committee’s note; see also United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 708 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1627 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. Porter
Compare United States v. Wagner, 834 F.2d 1474, 1486 (9th Cir.1987) (de novo) and United States v. Doubleday, 804 F.2d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.1986) (de novo), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1628 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987) with United States v. Busby, 780 F.2d 804, 806 (9th Cir.1986) (abuse of discretion) and United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th Cir.) (abuse of discretion), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); *329 see also United States v. Sotelo-Murillo, 887 F.2d 176, 179 (9th Cir.1989) (citing conflicting cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lutrell Davis
Compare United States v. Wagner, 834 F.2d 1474, 1486 (9th Cir.1987) (district court’s refusal to give defendant’s jury instruction on theory of case reviewed de novo) and United States v. Doubleday, 804 F.2d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.1986) (same) (dicta), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1628 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987), with United States v. Busby, 780 F.2d 804, 806 (9th Cir.1986) (refusal to give defendant’s entrapment instruction reviewed for abuse of discretion) and United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodriguez
v.
Wisconsin
v.
Wisconsin
No. 86-6031.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1987.
Published
Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.