green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“something more than unverified conjecture must be shown.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Washington
something more than unverified conjecture must be shown.
cited
Cited "see"
Steckel v. State
See Lovett v. State, 516 A.2d 455 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1898 , 95 L.Ed.2d 504 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Piorkowski
See Lovett v. State, 516 A.2d 455, 464-65 (Del. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S. Ct. 1898 , 95 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Quintero
See United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 290 (3d Cir.1986) (finding that challenged jury instruction did not affect any possible constitutional right, court applied “highly probable” standard of appellate review to assess the question of harmless error), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Quintero
See United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 290 (3d Cir.1986) (finding that challenged jury instruction did not affect any possible constitutional right, court applied "highly probable" standard of appellate review to assess the question of harmless error), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987). 62 We find that the dispute here involves a claim of nonconstitutional error in that it is based solely on a violation of Sec. 2518(8)(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville Wayne McGee
See United States v. Holloway, 798 F.2d 175, 176 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1897 , 95 L.Ed.2d 503 (1987); United States v. Ressler, 576 F.2d 650, 652 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 929 , 99 S.Ct. 1265 , 59 L.Ed.2d 485 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herbert W. Hector v. Frank A. Holbrook and Fancy H. Jezek
See Howell v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit, 710 S.W.2d 729, 732 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 (1987) (appellant responsible for filing motion for extension of time to file statement of facts with court of appeals while pauper's oath contest to determine eligibility for free statement of facts being decided).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Esposito
See United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278 (3d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cole
See United States v. Andrews, 790 F.2d 803, 806 (10th Cir.1986) (serious illness of appellant constitutes excusable neglect), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1898 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987); In re Buckingham Super Markets, Inc., 631 F.2d 763, 766 (D.C.Cir.1980) (“... misunderstanding between counsel and client represented a sufficient foundation for showing of excusable neglect.”).
cited
Cited "see"
McLain v. General Motors Corp.
See Lovett v. State, Del.Supr., 516 A.2d 455, 475 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1898 , 95 L.Ed.2d 504 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bryan
See Lovett v. State, Del.Supr., 516 A.2d 455, 465 (1986), cert. de *818 nied, Lovett v. Delaware, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1898 , 95 L.Ed.2d 504 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strickland v. Shotts
See also Scholes v. Lehmann, 56 F.3d 750 (7th Cir.1995) cert. denied 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 673 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 and Rodriguez v. Schweiger, 796 F.2d 930 (7th Cir.1986) ce rt. denied 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore Edmonds, in No. 93-1890. United States of America v. Lorenzo Duncan, A/K/A Tariq Lorenzo Duncan, in No. 93-1914. United States of America v. Carlton Love, in No. 93-1920. United States of America v. Cora Love, in No. 93-1947
See, e.g., United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 283-84 (3d Cir.1986) (stating that the government must prove that a felony violation of the narcotics law is "part of a continuing series of violations"), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 927 , 93 L.Ed.2d 978 , and cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edmonds
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 283-84 (3d Cir. 1986) (stating that the government must prove that a felony violation of the narcotics law is "part of a continuing series of violations"), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1054 , and cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Marrone, A/K/A Johnny Moose, John Marrone, United States of America v. Michael Paris
In a series of cases, albeit in another context, we have noted that Congress did not intend “RICO to be a substitute for the predicate offense,” but instead “intended to create separate offenses for the predicate acts and the substantive RICO charge.” United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60, 63-64 (3d Cir.1990), cert. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); see also United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 283 (3d Cir.1986) (“Congress, in enacting RICO, sought to allow the separate prosecution and punishment of predicate offenses and a subsequent RICO offens…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sharon A. Theurer
See United States v. Stayton, 791 F.2d 17, 18 (2d Cir.1986) (over twenty-three months); United States v. Fox, 788 F.2d 905, 908 (2d Cir.1986) (five months); see also United States v. Andrews, 790 F.2d 803, 808 (10th Cir.1986) (over two and one-half months while the defendant was incarcerated for inability to post bail), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Graack v. Borough of Nazareth
See also Rodriguez v. Schweiger, 796 F.2d 930, 932-933 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987); Brown v. Green, 738 F.2d 202, 206 (7th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Makin v. Department of Corrections
See, e.g., U.S. v. Andrews, 790 F.2d 803, 806 (10th Cir.1986) (defendant seriously ill, heavily medicated, and not represented by counsel), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 (1987); U.S. v. Twomey, 845 F.2d 1132, 1134 (1st Cir.1988) (filing delay resulted from postal service or court personnel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricou Deshaw
See e.g., United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 927 , 93 L.Ed.2d 978 , 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987); United States v. Schell, 775 F.2d 559 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1498 , 89 L.Ed.2d 898 (1986) 19 Cf. Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137 , 97 S.Ct. 2207 , 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977) (a conspiracy to distribute drugs in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 is a lesser included offense to conducting a CCE in violation of § 848) 20 Other circuits have also concluded that double jeopardy considera…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Deshaw
See e.g., United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278 (3d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 927 , 93 L.Ed.2d 978 , 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987); United States v. Schell, 775 F.2d 559 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1498 , 89 L.Ed.2d 898 (1986). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garland Arnoldt, United States of America v. Garland Arnoldt, A/K/A Shagg
See, e.g., United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 283 (3d Cir.1986) (“successive prosecutions for a RICO offense and its underlying predicate offenses are not inconsistent with the double jeopardy clause”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 927 , 93 L.Ed.2d 978 , 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 505 (1987); accord United States v. Schell, 775 F.2d 559, 568 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1498 , 89 L.Ed.2d 898 (1986); United States v. Boldin, 772 F.2d 719, 728-30 (11th Cir.1985), modified on other grounds, 779 F.2d 618 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zimmerman v. State
See also Lovett v. State, Del.Supr. 516 A.2d 455, 468 (1986) cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1898 , 95 L.Ed.2d 504 (1987) (holding that evidence presented at trial clearly justified the trial court’s accomplice liability instruction and did not cause defendant prejudice or unfair surprise, even though details of accomplice liability were not disclosed in bill of particulars).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quinn v. Cain
Bay State Insurance Co. v. Wilson, 96 Ill.2d 487, 492 , 71 Ill.Dec. 726, 728 , 451 N.E.2d 880, 882 (1983); Thornton v. Paul, 74 Ill.2d 132, 151 , 23 Ill.Dec. 541, 549 , 384 N.E.2d 335, 343 (1978); State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Shelton, 176 Ill.App.3d 858, 862 , 126 Ill.Dec. 286, 289 , 531 N.E.2d 913, 916 (1st Dist.1988); see also Rodriguez v. Schweiger, 796 F.2d 930, 933 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 294 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986); United States v. Tenorio-Angel, 756 F.2d 1505, 1508 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Daly, 716 F.2d 1499, 1506 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1075 , 104 S.Ct. 1456 , 79 L.Ed.2d 773 (1984); United States v. Little, 567 F.2d 346, 349 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1608 , 56 L.Ed.2d 60 (1978); see also United States v. Andrews, 790 F.2d 803, 810 (10th Cir.1986) (applying waiver where defendant pleaded guilty), cert. denied, 481 U.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holloway et ux.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-1481.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Delaware (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.