green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent L. Lomax
See United States v. Kabat, 797 F.2d 580, 591 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1958 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent L. Lomax
See United States v. Kabat, 797 F.2d 580, 591 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Martinez, United States of America v. Augustin Nava, United States of America v. Alan Clark, United States of America v. Jose Manuel Limon-Uriarte
See United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986) (testimony of accomplice may sustain conviction unless it is incredible or unsubstantial on its face), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Interest of DOE
See United States v. Taylor, 792 F.2d 1019, 1025 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1957 , 1958, 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Milton Donovan Olson, United States of America v. Bryan D. Olson
United States v. Sitton, 968 F.2d 947, 959 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 478 (1992), and cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1306 (1993); United States v. Kulczyk, 931 F.2d 542, 548 (9th Cir.1991). 4 A Rule 33 motion based upon newly discovered evidence requires the movant to show: 5 (1) the evidence is newly discovered; (2) the failure to discover the evidence sooner was not the result of lack of diligence; (3) the evidence is material to the issues at trial; (4) the evidence is neither cumulative nor impeaching; and (5) the evidence indicates that a new trial would probably result in acquittal. 6 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago Ceja-Navarro
Additionally, the uncorroborated testimony of an individual associated with the crime is "enough to sustain a conviction unless it is incredible or unsubstantial on its face." Lai, 944 F.2d at 1440 ; accord United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987). 6 At jury trial, Drug Enforcement Administration Agent Richard McConnell and a confidential informant (CI) testified to the following facts.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Hosey
See United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987). 14 Under the circumstances here, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hosey's motion for a mistrial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Yancy Hawkins
See United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. A. Lanoy Alston, D.M.D., P.C. Ronald D. Walker Desert Valley Dental, Ltd. Richard B. Meyer Aaron L. (\Lanoy\") Alston"
Id.; see United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 977 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1958 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987); United States v. Shaffer, 789 F.2d 682, 687 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Falsia, 724 F.2d 1339, 1343 (9th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fraidin v. Weitzman
The plaintiff must establish that the attorney did not act within the role of an advisor and merely advise, but instead knew of the client’s wrongful conduct and was actively involved in the wrongful conduct. 527 F.Supp. at 585 ; See McElhanon v. Hing, 151 Ariz. 386 , *236 394-95, 728 P.2d 256, 264-265 (Ariz.App.1985), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1956 , 95 L.Ed.2d 529 (1987) (an attorney who participated in a fraudulent transfer by knowingly drafting the stock transfer agreement is chargeable with conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony J. Accardo and Clarice Accardo v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See United States v. Guzzino, 810 F.2d 687, 690 (7th Cir.1987), certiorari denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1957 , 95 L.Ed.2d 529 Accardo was one of three defendants acquitted, while the remaining eight were convicted and sentenced. 1 Id. at 690 n. 6.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jon Darrell Stauffer
See United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 974-75 (9th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1958 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987) (defendant, who agreed to accept bad checks and hold them until sufficient funds were deposited, extended credit pursuant to the statute); United States v. DiPasquale, 740 F.2d 1282, 1287 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1228 , 105 S.Ct. 1226 , 84 L.Ed.2d 364 (1985) (organized crime defendants' use of torture in an effort to coerce payments compelled the court to determine that "an agreement to defer the repayment of a debt may be implied from the debt, e…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. Angiulo
See United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 88 (1st Cir.1986) (finding no error in the trial court’s failure to give a particular credibility instruction where the court had adequately given general credibility instructions), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 95 L.Ed.2d 531 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moshe Fox
See United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 972 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987) ("where the defendant opens the door to an argument, it may be 'fair advocacy' for the prosecution to enter"); see, e.g., United States v. Sotelo-Murillo, No. 85-5291, slip op. at 12381 (9th Cir. Oct. 4, 1989); United States v. Beltran-Rios, 878 F.2d 1208, 1211 (9th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Gyetvay
United States v. Smith, 918 F.2d 1501, 1509 (11th Cir. 1990); see also United States v. Taylor, 792 F.2d 1019, 1025 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987) (holding that the district court did not abuse its discre- tion where the defendant challenged the denial of his motion to suppress on timeliness grounds); United States v. Andres, 960 F.3d 1310, 1315 (11th Cir. 2020) (“We review for abuse of discretion the denial of [a] motion to suppress on the grounds of timeliness.” (cit- ing Smith, 918 F.2d at 1509 )). 3 When a party fails to establish good cause for an untimely motion…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
King v. Lynaugh , 828 F.2d 257 , 264-65 (5th Cir. 1987), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir. 1988) ; see also United States v. Williams , 809 F.2d 75 , 83-86 (1st Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877, 96 L.Ed. 2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson , 645 F.2d 616 , 617-18 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875 , 102 S.Ct. 351 , 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. State
King v. Lynaugh 828 F.2d 257, 264-65 (5th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 83-86 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877, 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson, 645 F.2d 616, 617-18 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875 , 102 S.Ct. 351 , 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doster v. State
King v. Lynaugh, 828 F.2d 257, 264-65 (5th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 83-86 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877, 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson, 645 F.2d 616, 617-18 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875 , 102 S.Ct. 351 , 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. State
King v. Lynaugh, 828 F.2d 257, 264-65 (5th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 83-86 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877, 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson, 645 F.2d 616, 617-18 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875 , 102 S.Ct. 351 , 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gobble v. State
King v. Lynaugh, 828 F.2d 257, 264-65 (5th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 83-86 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877, 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson, 645 F.2d 616, 617-18 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875 , 102 S.Ct. 351 , 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BARCO v. Tilton
See United States v. Necoechea, 986 F.2d 1273, 1282 (9th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986) (“The uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice is enough to sustain a conviction unless the testimony is incredible or unsubstantial on its face.”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1958 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987); Sabari v. United States, 333 F.2d 1019, 1020 (9th Cir.1964) (“the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to support a jury verdict.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gregory
E.g., People v. Boyette, 29 Cal.4th 381 , 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 544 , 58 P.3d 391, 425 (2002) (holding in a capital case that argument commenting on the lack of corroboration for the defendant's story did not shift the burden of proof); see also United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 (1987). ś 178 Gregory cites to two Washington cases in which arguably similar arguments were found to be improper.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gregory
E.g., People v. Boyette, 29 Cal. 4th 381 , 58 P.3d 391, 425 , 127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 544 (2002) (holding in a capital case that argument commenting on the lack of corroboration for the defendant’s story did not shift the burden of proof); see also United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987). ¶178 Gregory cites to two Washington cases in which arguably similar arguments were found to be improper.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barber v. State
King v. Lynaugh, 828 F.2d 257, 264-65 (5th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 83-86 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877, 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson, 645 F.2d 616, 617-18 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875 , 102 S.Ct. 351 , 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael R. Romero v. Robert J. Tansy and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969 , 973 n. 1 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that if a witness’s in-court identification is supported by a pretrial photospread identification and the defendant “does not claim that the photo-spread procedure was unnecessarily or impermissibly suggestive[,] ... our inquiry ends”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1958 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987); United States v. Davies, 768 F.2d 893, 903 (7th Cir.) (“Having failed to assert that the [pretrial] photographic identification ... was impermissibly suggestive[,] we will not now hold the subsequent in…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cram
See, e.g., United States v. Kabat, 797 F.2d 580, 590 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987); United States v. Montgomery, 772 F.2d 733, 737-38 (11th Cir. 1985); United States v. Brodhead, 714 F. Supp. 593, 597-98 (D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santos Jesus Martinez-Torres, United States of America v. Luis Alfredo Martinez-Torres, United States of America v. Epifanio Martinez-Torres, A/K/A \Fanny
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 82 (1st Cir.1986) (plain error would be one which "virtually ... insure[d]" a different outcome), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 481 U.S. 1072 , 107 S.Ct. 2469 , 95 L.Ed.2d 877 , 482 U.S. 906 , 107 S.Ct. 2484 , 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. West, 723 F.2d 1 , 2 n. 1 (1st Cir.1983) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1188 , 105 S.Ct. 956 , 83 L.Ed.2d 963 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martinez-Torres
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 82 (1st Cir.1986) (plain error would be one which "virtually ... insure[d]” a different outcome), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 481 U.S. 1072 , 107 S.Ct. 2469 , 95 L.Ed.2d 877 , 482 U.S. 906 , 107 S.Ct. 2484 , 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. West, 723 F.2d 1 , 2 n. 1 (1st Cir.1983) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1188 , 105 S.Ct. 956 , 83 L.Ed.2d 963 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C.E. v. State
See State v. Breland, 421 So.2d 761, 766 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Wingert v. State, 353 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); State v. Hinton, 305 So.2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.130(b)(5); see also United States v. Taylor, 792 F.2d 1019, 1024-25 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1957 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987); cf. Savoie v. State, 422 So.2d 308 (Fla.1982) (trial court excused jury and conducted evidentiary hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress during trial and thereafter expressly ruled that search conducted therein was reasonable).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Esnoel Lopez-Pena, United States of America v. Hector Burgos, A/K/A \Tito
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 82 (1st Cir.1986) (plain error would be one which "virtually ... insure[d]" a different outcome), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 1072, 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877; 482 U.S. 906 , 107 S.Ct. 2484 , 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. West, 723 F.2d 1 , 2 n. 1 (1st Cir.1983) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1188 , 105 S.Ct. 956 , 83 L.Ed.2d 963 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez-Pena
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 82 (1st Cir.1986) (plain error would be one which "virtually ... insure[d]” a different outcome), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 1072, 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877; 482 U.S. 906 , 107 S.Ct. 2484 , 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. West, 723 F.2d 1 , 2 n. 1 (1st Cir.1983) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1188 , 105 S.Ct. 956 , 83 L.Ed.2d 963 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 972 (9th Cir.1986) (court has broad discretion to determine whether evidence is relevant), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation and the American Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation, Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Washington Public Power Supply System, a Washington Municipal Corporation Vera Claussen Kenneth Cochrant Raymond Colbert Cornelius Duffie Sam Farmer Carl Halvorson Parker Knight Paul Nolan Lois Powell Sydney Steinborn Louis Winnard James Perko Richard Breshnahan
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 972 (9th Cir.1986) (court has broad discretion to determine whether evidence is relevant), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 95 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jack C. Turner
See generally Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 684 , 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1438 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986) (no reversal of conviction if Confrontation Clause violation harmless beyond a reasonable doubt). 3 The error is harmless *1582 if there is no “reasonable probability that the evidence complained of might have contributed to the conviction.” Fahy v. Connecticut, 375 U.S. 85, 86-87 , 84 S.Ct. 229, 230-31 , 11 L.Ed.2d 171 (1963); see also United States v. Taylor, 792 F.2d 1019, 1027 (11th Cir.1986) (no reversible error in erroneous admission of hearsay evidence because remaining evidence s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny Lee Gates v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent
King v. Lynaugh, 828 F.2d 257, 264-65 (5th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 75, 83-86 (1st Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1959 , 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531 , 877, 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson, 645 F.2d 616, 617-18 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875 , 102 S.Ct. 351 , 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando Estevez
United States v. Redwine, 715 F.2d 315, 319 (7th Cir.1983) (citations omitted) (quoting United States v. Kwitek, 467 F.2d 1222, 1226 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1079 , 93 S.Ct. 702 , 34 L.Ed.2d 668 (1972)), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1216 , 104 S.Ct. 2661 , 81 L.Ed.2d 367 (1984); see also United States v. Guzzino, 810 F.2d 687, 696-97 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 1957 , 95 L.Ed.2d 529 (1987); Perry, 747 F.2d at 1169 ; United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 858 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pointon
v.
Oklahoma
v.
Oklahoma
No. 86-1491.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1987.
Published
Ct. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.