green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[T]he liquidated damages awards obviated any need to resolve individual questions of reliance and damages”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rodriguez v. Carlson
he liquidated damages awards obviated any need to resolve individual questions of reliance and damages
cited
Cited "see"
Mazzaro v. Arcadia Mach. & Tool, Inc.
See Harriman v. Demoulas Supermarkets, Inc., 518 A.2d 1035, 1037 (Me. 1986), cert. denied 481 U.S. 1048 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zarrella v. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins., 96-2782 (1999)
See Montelongo v. Meese , 803 F.2d 1341 , 1351 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1048 (1987) (district court did not abuse its discretion in granting certification three years after suit was instituted where delays were caused by plaintiff's post-filing discovery efforts, docket backlog and where defendants were not prejudiced by the delay); Polich v. Burlington Northern, Inc. , 116 F.R.D. 258 (D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Roxas v. Marcos
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 (2d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied sub nom New York Land Co. v. Republic of the Philippines, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987) (Republic I). 27 The Republic I court de *132 scribed its rejection of Marcos’s act of state defense in the following terms: Appellants simply fail to make the crucial distinction between acts of Marcos as head of state, which may be protected from judicial scrutiny even if illegal under Philippine law, and his purely private acts.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sepulveda
See United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1, 6-7 , cert. denied 481 U.S. 1048 (1987) (Attempt to contact counsel by telephone in the presence of the police constituted an exercise of right to counsel, even though there was no express statement to the police that the defendant wanted an attorney present.) However, subsequent facts establish that the Appellant waived his right to have counsel present when he reinitiated contact with Officer McCarter.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sequa Capital Corp. v. Nave
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 356 (2d Cir.1986) (where attachment under CPLR 6201 would have been unavailable, court affirmed issuance of injunction imposing a constructive trust on properties which were part of the underlying claims and where money damages were not requested), cert. dismissed, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 ; In re Feit & Drexler, Inc., 760 F.2d 406, 416 (2d Cir.1985) (where there was danger that defendant would dissipate her assets in an action for money damages, court …
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. Baker
Although Preiser would not ordinarily require exhaustion of remedies prior to bringing a Section 1983 action for damages, the Sixth Circuit has held that a federal court must “stay its hand where disposition of the damage action would involve a ruling implying that a state conviction [or sentence] is or would be illegal.” Hadley v. Werner, 753 F.2d 514, 515 (6th Cir.1985); accord Jones v. Shankland, 800 F.2d 77, 81-83 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2177 , 95 L.Ed.2d 834 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Brien v. City of New York
See Cooper v. Diamond M Co., 799 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir.1986) (discussing retroactivity of section 763a with respect to unseaworthiness admiralty action), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2177 , 95 L.Ed.2d 834 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eustacio Martinez v. Kyle Shinn and Karen Shinn, and Shinn & Son, Inc.
See Montelongo v. Meese, 803 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2179 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987) (plaintiffs awarded $500 for each of three violations); Washington v. Miller, 721 F.2d 797 (11th Cir.1983) (plaintiffs awarded $500 for each of four or five *1000 violations); Espinoza v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., 641 F.2d 535 (7th Cir.), overruled, on other grounds, 658 F.2d 1217 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 27 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1981) (plaintiffs awarded $500 for single violation); Bertrand v. Jorden, 672 F.Supp. 1417 (M.D.Fla.1987) (plaintiffs a…
discussed
Cited "see"
Escobar v. Baker
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Montelongo v. Meese, 803 F.2d 1341, 1352 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, Martin v. Montelongo, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2179 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987); Six Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers, 904 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir.1990) (class consisted of 1349 undocumented workers who were employed by defendant during the 1976-77 picking season).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Court Of Common Pleas
See United States v. Porter, 807 F.2d 21, 23-24 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987) ("Porter cannot argue that the vacating of his conviction for legal error, on direct appeal from his first trial, marked the end to his original jeopardy; the doctrine of continuing jeopardy, implicit in United States v. Ball, and made explicit more recently [in Justices of Boston ], has long since rejected such claims." (citations omitted)); see also Kepner v. United States, 195 U.S. 100 , 24 S.Ct. 797 , 49 L.Ed. 114 (1904) (Holmes J., dissenting) (jeopardy of f…
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County
See United States v. Porter, 807 F.2d 21, 23-24 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987) (“Porter cannot argue that the vacating of his conviction for legal error, on direct appeal from his first trial, marked the end to his original jeopardy; the doctrine of continuing jeopardy, implicit in United States v. Ball, and made explicit more recently [in Justices of Boston ], has long since rejected such claims.” (citations omitted)); see also Kepner v. United States, 195 U.S. 100 , 24 S.Ct. 797 , 49 L.Ed. 114 (1904) (Holmes J., dissenting) (jeopardy …
cited
Cited "see"
Moche v. City University of New York
See Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 352 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied New York Land Company v. Republic of Philippines, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. DiMuro
See order denying rehearing in United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1 , at 776 F.2d 370 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 (1987). 3 *3 It is not material that the particular officers conducting the investigation may not have known that the defendant had arranged to be represented by counsel on the charges.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coyle
See United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987) (right asserted by attempting to contact attorney in presence of one DEA agent, knowledge imputed to DEA supervisor).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Doe
See United States v. Porter, 807 F.2d 21 (1st Cir.1986) (if it is determined on appeal that district court should not have admitted unlawfully obtained evidence, new trial permissible whether or not remaining evidence would have proved sufficient to support verdict), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987); United States v. Key, 725 F.2d 1123 (7th Cir.1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Doe, A/K/A Lynn M. O'brien, United States of America v. John Doe, A/K/A Randy S. Parmeter, United States of America v. John Doe, A/K/A Ralph Rios, United States of America v. John Doe, A/K/A Dominic Santini
See United States v. Porter, 807 F.2d 21 (1st Cir.1986) (if it is determined on appeal that district court should not have admitted unlawfully obtained evidence, new trial permissible whether or not remaining evidence would have proved sufficient to support verdict), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987); United States v. Key, 725 F.2d 1123 (7th Cir.1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wade v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
See Cooper v. Diamond M Company, 799 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2177 , 95 L.Ed.2d 834 (1987) (46 U.S.C.App. § 763a, which replaced the maritime doctrine of laches in tort cases with a three year limitations period, applies to claims that accrued prior to the passage of the statute and such claims filed more than three years after the passage of the statute are time-barred).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Jess Palmer v. Gary Grammer, Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary
See United States v. Porter, 807 F.2d 21 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987); United States v. Tranowski, 702 F.2d 668 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3586 , 82 L.Ed.2d 884 (1984); United States v. Sarmiento-Perez, 667 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 834 , 103 S.Ct. 77 , 74 L.Ed.2d 75 (1982); United States v. Harmon, 632 F.2d 812 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Mandel, 591 F.2d 1347 (4th Cir.), aff’d on rehearing, 602 F.2d 653 (4th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 961 , 100 S.Ct. 1647 , 64 L.Ed.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Anderson v. COUNTY OF HAMILTON
See also Jones v. Shankland, 800 F.2d 77, 80 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2177 , 95 L.Ed.2d 834 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koffman v. Smith
Ass’n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 , 355 (2d Cir.1986) (“constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship”) (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tucker
See, e.g., United States v. Porter, 807 F.2d 21, 24 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987); United States v. Mandel, 591 F.2d 1347, 1373-74 , overruled in part on other grounds on rehearing, 602 F.2d 653 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 961 , 100 S.Ct. 1647 , 64 L.Ed.2d 236 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tucker
See, e.g., United States v. Porter, 807 F.2d 21, 24 (1st Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S. Ct. 2178 , 95 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carlough v. Amchem Products, Inc.
See, e.g., Montelongo v. Meese, 803 F.2d 1341, 1352 (5th Cir.1986) (approving post-trial modification of class definition pursuant to court’s “broad authority to redefine the class ‘as appropriate in response to the progression of the case ...’”) (quoting Richardson v. Byrd, 709 F.2d 1016, 1019 (5th Cir. 1983)), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2179 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Jerry L. Marshall and Henrietta S. Marshall, Debtors. Jerry L. Marshall and Henrietta S. Marshall v. Security State Bank of Hamilton
See also Montelongo v. Meese, 803 F.2d 1341, 1354 (5th Cir.1986) (prejudgment interest not allowed on an award of liquidated damages under the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act, which like the TILA offers plaintiffs a choice of proving actual damages or receiving liquidated damages), certiorari denied, 481 U.S. 1048 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc.
Ass’n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 355 (2d Cir.1986) (“constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship”) (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Koreag, Controle Et Revision S.A.
Ass'n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 , 355 (2d Cir.1986) ("constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship") (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 1048 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc. (In re Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A.)
Ass’n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 355 (2d Cir.1986) (“constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship”) (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 10…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Favorite v. Marine Personnel & Provisioning, Inc.
See also Cruz v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc., 634 F.Supp. 107, 109 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 806 F.2d 252 (3d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clifton Favorite v. Marine Personnel and Provisioning, Inc., Individually, and as Agent for Marine Transport Management Company, Inc., Clifton Favorite v. Marine Personnel and Provisioning, Inc.
See also Cruz v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc., 634 F.Supp. 107, 109 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 806 F.2d 252 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987). 15 Favorite, however, relies on this court's opinion in Williams v. Central Gulf Lines, 874 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1045 , 110 S.Ct. 843 , 107 L.Ed.2d 837 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William N. Logan, Jr. And Eddie Stanley
See Smith v. Illinois, 469 U.S. 91, 98-99 , 105 S.Ct. 490, 494 , 83 L.Ed.2d 488 (1984); Thompson v. Wainwright, 601 F.2d 768, 772 (5th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Porter, 776 F.2d 370, 370 (1st Cir.1985) (where accused’s words and actions are ambiguous, “questioning officers must find out more specifically whether he wants a lawyer before they can proceed further with other questioning”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987); United States v. Cherry, 733 F.2d *1376 1124, 1130-32 (5th Cir.1984) (inquiries as to desire for consultation with counsel …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 356 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aviles v. Kunkle
Compare Salazar-Calderon, 765 F.2d at 1347-48 with Montelongo v. Meese, 803 F.2d 1341, 1350 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied sub nom., Martin v. Montelongo, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2179 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sampson
(2×)
See also United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1985) (unsuccessful call to attorney’s office in presence of officer treated as equivocal request for counsel), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 (1987); People v. Quirk, 129 Cal.App.3d 618 , 181 Cal.Rptr. 301, 308 (1982) (inquiry by defendant as to whether wife had hired an attorney treated as equivocal request for counsel).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cooper
v.
Diamond M Co.
v.
Diamond M Co.
No. 86-1048.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Washington (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.