green
Positive treatment
9.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Shepard v. City of Portland
See LaSalvia v. United Dairymen of Ariz., 804 F.2d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir.1986), cert. den., 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); Eichman v. Fotomat Corp., 880 F.2d 149, 160 (9th Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Elysee
Francis Hosp. of Port Jervis, 93 AD2d 491 [1983]; see generally Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Dec. 14, 1984, 69 NY2d 232, 241 [1987], cert denied 482 US 928 [1987]).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Roanoke v. Town of Westlake
(2×)
See City of Houston v. Savely, 708 S.W.2d 879, 887 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, writ refd n.r.e.) (“An ordinance that attempts to annex territory within the [ETJ] or municipal boundaries of another city is void.”), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987); see also McGregor, 523 S.W.2d at 653-54 .
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Roanoke v. Town of Westlake
See City of Houston v. Savely , 708 S.W.2d 879, 887 (Tex. App.--Houston [1 st Dist.] 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.) ("An ordinance that attempts to annex territory within the [ETJ] or municipal boundaries of another city is void."), cert. denied , 482 U.S. 928 (1987); see also McGregor , 523 S.W.2d at 653-54 .
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Roanoke v. Town of Westlake
See City of Houston v. Savely , 708 S.W.2d 879, 887 (Tex. App.—Houston [1 st Dist.] 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (“An ordinance that attempts to annex territory within the [ETJ] or municipal boundaries of another city is void.”), cert. denied , 482 U.S. 928 (1987); see also McGregor , 523 S.W.2d at 653 -54 .
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
See Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir.1984), cer t. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amarel v. Connell
See LaSalvia v. United Dairymen of Arizona, 804 F.2d 1113, 1116 (9th Cir.1986) (plaintiffs, independent dairy farmers, were competitors of dairy cooperative and therefore had standing to challenge cooperative's alleged anticompetitive conduct in suit for attempted monopolization), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987), and William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 668 F.2d 1014, 1024 (9th Cir.1981) (antitrust suit premised on allegations that defendant used discriminatory and below-cost pricing to drive out competition from independent bakers…
discussed
Cited "see"
Amarel v. Connell
See LaSalvia v. United Dairymen of Arizona, 804 F.2d 1113, 1116 (9th Cir.1986) (plaintiffs, independent dairy farmers, were competitors of dairy cooperative and therefore had standing to challenge cooperative’s alleged anticompetitive conduct in suit for attempted monopolization), ce rt. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987), and William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 668 F.2d 1014, 1024 (9th Cir. 1981) (antitrust suit premised on allegations that defendant used discriminatory and below-cost pricing to drive out competition from independent ba…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stigars v. State
It is for the defendant alone to decide “whether in his particular case counsel is to his advantage.” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 834 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 ; see Johnstone v. Kelly, 808 F.2d 214, 216 (2d Cir.1986), cert denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerome Williams v. George Bartlett, Howard R. Relin, Monroe County District Attorney, Intervenor-Respondent-Appellee
See Johnstone v. Kelly, 808 F.2d 214, 216 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garnet Morse v. Donna E. Shalala, 1 Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States
See Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Grant County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539, 541 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); NLRB v. Superior Forwarding, Inc., 762 F.2d 695, 697 (8th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grant County Savings & Loan Association v. Resolution Trust Corporation
See Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539, 541 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); NLRB v. Superior Forwarding, Inc., 762 F.2d 695, 697 (8th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glenn J. WARNEBOLD, Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, Appellee
See Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539, 541 (8th Cir.) (court applies “ordinary contract principles” in determining validity of ADEA release), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987). 2 The court found that the language of the release was clear and unambiguous; that Warnebold was an educated businessman, who had had seven days in which to consider signing the release and had admitted that he had read the release and understood its terms.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hal E. Totz v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services
See Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir.) (putting forth the factors on which to focus in determining the credibility of a claimant’s assertion of disabling pain), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. State
See Johnstone v. Kelly, 808 F.2d 214, 218 (2nd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987) (citing Faretta, 422 U.S. at 834 , 95 S.Ct. at 2540-41 ; Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 268 , 104 S.Ct. 1051, 1056 , 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell v. Sullivan
See, Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320 (order), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Swarts v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
See Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F. 2d 539, 541 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed. 2d 699 (1987); Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F. 2d *177 1039, 1044 n. 10 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 114 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Spitzmueller v. Burlington Northern Railroad
See Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539, 540-41 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Dallas Ingemunson, in His Capacity as State's Attorney of Kendall County, Illinois, and Kendall County, Illinois
(2×)
See 511 Detroit Street, Inc. v. Kelley, 807 F.2d 1293, 1299 (6th Cir.1986) (state obscenity statute threatening large fines not impermissible prior restraint), certiorari denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander Oil Co. v. City of Seguin
(2×)
See City of Houston v. Savely, 708 S.W.2d 879, 889 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987) (allegation of defect in public hearing will not support collateral attack); City of Houston v. Harris County Eastex Oaks Water & Sewer Disk, 438 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1969, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (defects in notice or in boundary descriptions of annexed area do not make ordinance void).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bormann v. At & T Communications, Inc.
See Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539, 540 (8th Cir.) (no absolute bar to release of claims under the ADEA), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1041-43 (6th Cir.) (in banc) (same), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bormann v. AT & T Communications, Inc.
See Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539, 540 (8th Cir.) (no absolute bar to release of claims under the ADEA), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1041-43 (6th Cir.) (in banc) (same), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Caleb J. TRUAX, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Appellee
(2×)
See Polaski v. Heckler, 585 F.Supp. 1004, 1011-1013, 1016, 1018-1019 (D.Minn.), dismissed, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (1986), cert denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987). 29 Third, in Rush we noted that the regulations governing terminations "simply do not say what the Secretary says they mean.
discussed
Cited "see"
Odie DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee
See Herbert v. Heckler, 783 F.2d 128, 130 (8th Cir.1986) (interpreting Polaski v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Braswell
See, e.g., John- stone v. Kelly, 808 F.2d 214, 218 (2d Cir. 1986) (citing cases), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S. Ct. 3212 , 96 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Slavin
(2×)
Defendant was therefore not “compelled . . . to be a witness against himself’ (US Const 5th Amend) within the meaning of the privilege (see United States v Hubbell, 530 US at 35-36 ; see also Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Dec. 14, 1984, Y., M.D., P.C. v Kuriansky, 69 NY2d 232, 242 [1987], cert denied 482 US 928 [1987]). 5 Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotam Electronics, Inc. v. Jbl Consumer Products, Inc.
(2×)
The Seventh Circuit, while not explicitly deciding the issue, has stated in dicta that companies “may agree to arbitrate their antitrust disputes — certainly so for international transactions, ... and likely so for domestic transactions.” Sanjuan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 250 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996); see also Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 785 F.2d 1274, 1282 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam, on petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wigg v. Chater
(2×)
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Derrig v. Chater
(2×)
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alverio v. Chater
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotam Electronics v. JBL Consumer
(2×)
The Seventh Circuit, while not explicitly deciding the issue, has stated in dicta that companies "may agree to arbitrate their antitrust disputes—certainly so for international transactions, ... and likely so for domestic transactions." Sanjuan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 250 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996); see also Smokey Greenhaw Cotton Co., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 785 F.2d 1274, 1282 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam, on petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotam Electronics v. JBL Consumer
(2×)
The Seventh Circuit, while not explicitly deciding the issue, has stated in dicta that companies "may agree to arbitrate their antitrust disputes -- certainly so for international transactions, 10 . . . and likely so for domestic transactions." Sanjuan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 250 (7th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996); see also Smokey Greenshaw Cotton Co., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 785 F.2d 1282, 1282 (5th Cir. 1986) (per curiam, on petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barry v. Shalala
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320 (order), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norng v. Shalala
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320 (order), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simons v. Sullivan
"Where a non-exertional impairment does so limit the claimant, the Secretary can only carry his burden through use of a vocational expert who can realistically appraise available work that can be performed by the claimant, given his existing abilities." Talbott, 821 F.2d at 515 . 22 An ALJ may disregard a claimant's allegation of pain if, based on consideration of all the evidence, the ALJ "explicitly discredits allegations of pain for a legally sufficient reason." Millbrook v. Heckler, 780 F.2d 1371, 1373-74 (8th Cir.1985); see also Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1321-22 , supplemented, 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simons v. Sullivan
An AU may disregard a claimant’s allegation of pain if, based on consideration of all the evidence, the AU “explicitly discredits allegations of pain for a legally sufficient reason.” Millbrook v. Heckler, 780 F.2d 1371, 1373-74 (8th Cir.1985); see also Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1321-22 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Constant v. Continental Telephone Co. of Illinois
See also, Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Comyany, 809 F.2d 539, 540-541 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edison Purnett, A/K/A \Panama\""
(2×)
Thus, in Faretta the Supreme Court stated that the right of a criminal defendant to conduct his own defense is constitutionally protected, 422 U.S. at 818-32 , 95 S.Ct. at 2532-40 , but that "in order to represent himself, the accused must 'knowingly and intelligently' forgo [the benefits of counsel]." Id. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 ; see also Johnstone v. Kelly, 808 F.2d 214, 216 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Intrepid v. Mamie E. Pollock, District Director of Customs, and the United States of America
See also LaSalvia v. United Dairymen of Arizona, 804 F.2d 1113 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 668 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 57 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
USAir, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.
See, e.g., LaSalvia v. United Dairymen of Arizona, 804 F.2d 1113, 1115 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); Exhibitors’ Service, Inc. v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc., 788 F.2d 574, 578 (9th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Passenger Computer Reservation Systems
See, e.g., LaSalvia v. United Dairymen of Arizona, 804 F.2d 1113, 1115 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); Exhibitors' Service, Inc. v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc., 788 F.2d 574, 578 (9th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James J. Nicholson v. Cpc International Inc., a Corporation, and James R. Eiszner
(2×)
Among those factors ... are general principles of contract construction such as the clarity and lack of ambiguity of the language ... and the absence of fraud or undue influence. 856 F.2d at 522 (citations omitted); see also Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539, 541 (8th Cir.) (ADEA substantive waiver valid where there was no “exploitation or overreaching”), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); Moore v. McGraw Edison Co., 804 F.2d 1026, 1033 (8th Cir.1986) (ADEA substantive waiver valid “in the absence of fraud, deceit or unconscionable overr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosa Lee BROWN, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee
See, e.g., Polaski v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 943, 948 (8th Cir.1984) [vacated and remanded, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3211, 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987) ]; Layton v. Heckler, 726 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir.1984); Ragsdale v. Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 623 F.2d 528, 530 (8th Cir.1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co., Inc.
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
No. 86-1620.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1987.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.