green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
“he trial court must give the jury careful instructions pointing out the suspect credibility of a fact witness who has been or expects to be compensated for his testimony.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bradfield
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
he trial court must give the jury careful instructions pointing out the suspect credibility of a fact witness who has been or expects to be compensated for his testimony.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Filemon Bernal-Obeso
n informant who is promised a contingent fee by the government is not disqualified from testifying in a federal criminal trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson
(2×)
See United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705, 717 (2d Cir. 1987) (testimony of paid FBI informant was for the jury to evaluate, listing cases and quoting United States v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc)), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 (1988); United States v. Jones, 575 F.2d 81, 85-86 (6th Cir. 1978) (holding it is not necessary to exclude the testimony of an informant paid for information leading to a conviction under a contingency fee arrangement).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schlamer
(2×)
See United States v. Stark, 24 MJ 381, 384-85 (CMA 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 750 , 98 L.Ed.2d 763 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton
See United States v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310, 315 (5th Cir.1987) (“It is difficult to imagine a greater motivation to lie than the inducement of a reduced sentence ____”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988); Schwartz, 785 F.2d at 680 (“A violation of trust which is influenced by the offer of an intangible service is no less damaging ... than if the influence was in the form of a cash kickback.”); United States v. Meinster, 619 F.2d 1041, 1045 (4th Cir.1980) (“We think it obvious that promises of immunity or leniency premised on cooperation in …
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Calhoun, Jr. v. Al. C. Parke
See United States v. Fakhoury, 819 F.2d 1415, 1423 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988). 10 Calhoun asserts that the prosecutor's question regarding the state witnesses' veracity constituted misconduct.
cited
Cited "see"
Jacobs v. State
See United States v. *532 Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc), cert. denied, Nelson v. United States, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Howard Baer, Inc. And Crystal Carriers, Inc., Joint Employers, Gregory Baer, Additional in Contempt
See NLRB v. Seligman and Assoc., Inc., 808 F.2d 1155, 1160 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 750 , 98 L.Ed.2d 763 (1988) (reinstatement to prior job required where employer offered no evidence that prior job existed); Morvay v. Maghielse Tool and Die Co., 708 F.2d 229, 232 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1011 , 104 S.Ct. 534 , 78 L.Ed.2d 715 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Heritage Fire Protection, Inc.
See NLRB v. Seligman & Assocs., Inc., 808 F.2d 1155, 1160 (6th Cir.1986) ("[A]n employer must offer unfairly discharged employees their former positions or substantially similar ones[.]"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aycock
Although certain methods of impeachment may not be supported by extrinsic evidence, see Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 608(b), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, “[bjias, prejudice, or any motive to misrepresent may be shown to impeach the witness either by examination of the witness or by evidence otherwise adduced,” R.C.M. 608(e) (emphasis added); see United States v. Owen, 24 M.J. 390 (C.M.A. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 750 , 98 L.Ed.2d 763 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos J. Velarde v. United States
See United States v. Slaughter, 900 F.2d 1119, 1124-25 (7th Cir.1990). *829 Although we are not obligated to address both prongs, United States v. Fakhoury, 819 F.2d 1415, 1424 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988), we also observe for the sake of thoroughness that the decision of Velarde’s counsel not to pursue the issue can be viewed as a reasonable tactical decision given the fact that Jiminez’s out-of-court statements further implicated Ve-larde.
cited
Cited "see"
Severance Tool Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Great Lakes Steel v. NLRB, 625 F.2d 131, 133 (6th Cir.1980); accord NLRB v. Chelsea Lab., Inc., 825 F.2d 680, 683 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 (1988); see 29 U.S.C. 160(e) (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter L. Nixon, Jr. v. United States of America
(2×)
See United States v. Nixon, 816 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988). 47 In May 1989, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Nixon on three articles relating to his perjury.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Abel Salinas
See United States v. Nixon, 816 F.2d 1022, 1029 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988) (in order to obtain a conviction for perjury, the Government must prove that the statements made by the defendant were (1) false, (2) material, and (3) not believed by the defendant to be true).
cited
Cited "see"
Mississippi State Bar v. Nixon
See Nixon v. United States, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel T. Slaughter
See United States v. Fakhoury, 819 F.2d 1415, 1424 (7th Cir.1987) (“[W]e need not assess the performance component of the Strickland analysis because the appellant clearly has not satisfied his burden of showing prejudice.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
John Powers v. The Chicago Transit Authority
See United States v. Fakhoury, 819 F.2d 1415, 1424 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026, 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988). 5 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramsey, Charles W.
P. 11 Advisory Committee's notes (1975) (brackets in original); see also id.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramsey, Charles W.
P. 11 Advisory Committee's notes (1975) (brackets in original); see also id.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Medina
See also United States v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310, 315 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988) (“No practice is more ingrained in our criminal justice system than the practice of the government calling a witness who is an accessory to the crime for which the defendant is charged and having that witness testify under a plea bargain that promises him a reduced sentence.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co. v. Robert L. Clark, Comptroller of the Currency
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Nixon, 827 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (on petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en banc) (eleven of fourteen active judges recused), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James E. Clark
See also United States v. Alexander, 849 F.2d 1293, 1301 (10th Cir.1988) (admission or exclusion of evidence) 2 Defendant cites United States v. Barrios-Moriera, 872 F.2d 12, 16 (2d Cir.) ("lawful entry, inadvertent discovery, and probable cause" must be present for "plain view" seizure test to apply), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 (1989) 3 See also Johnston v. Makowski, 823 F.2d 387, 390 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 (1988); United States v. Marx, 485 F.2d 1179, 1184 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 986 (1974) 4 Sands, 899 F.2d at 916 (citing Sumrall v. United States, 360 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan A. Delgado, Juan A. Delgado v. United States
See also United States v. Fakhoury, 819 F.2d 1415, 1424 (7th Cir.1987) (“[W]e need not assess the performance component of the Strickland analysis because the appellant clearly has not satisfied his burden of showing prejudice.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
US for Use of Allied Bldg. Prod. v. Federal Ins.
See, e.g., U.S.A. f/u/b/o Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Brandt Construction Co., 595 F.Supp. 1117, 1119 (C.D.Ill.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 826 F.2d 643 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 751 , 98 L.Ed.2d 764 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Allied Building Products Corp. v. Federal Insurance
See, e.g., U.S.A. f/u/b/o Owens-Coming Fiberglass Corp. v. Brandt Construction Co., 595 F.Supp. 1117, 1119 (C.D.Ill.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 826 F.2d 643 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 751 , 98 L.Ed.2d 764 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Seligman & Associates, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 87-742.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.