green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Elkem Metals Co. v. United States
mere allegations of financial harm, or assertions that an agency failed to follow a statute, do not make the remedy established by congress manifestly inadequate.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States Customs Service
section 1581(i) jurisdiction may not be invoked when jurisdiction under another subsection of 1581 is or could have been available
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gadison
See United States v. Hutchins, 818 F.2d 322, 328-29 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 , 108 S.Ct. 772 , 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clifton Redman v. County of San Diego Capt. Richard Beall Lt. Robert Witcraft Sgt. Dan Canfield Deputy Gene Turner, and Does I Through Xx, Inclusive
(2×)
See Lee v. United States, 809 F.2d 1406, 1408 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 , 108 S.Ct. 772 , 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988) 3 The statute provides in relevant part: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage ... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress...." 42 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kahrs International, Inc. v. United States
See Dexter v. United States, 78 Cust.Ct. 179 , 181 (1977) (“[T]his court has no jurisdiction” over any entries “[u]ntil the entries are liquidated and [the] protests [are] denied[.]”); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2637 (a). 10 Next, the Court notes that § 1581(i) — the residual jurisdiction provision — may only be invoked when another subsection of § 1581 is unavailable or the remedy provided by another subsection is “manifestly inadequate.” 11 See Nat’l Com *1264 Growers Ass’n v. Baker, 840 F.2d 1547, 1557 (Fed.Cir.1988); see also Miller & Co. v. United States, 824 F.2d 961, 96…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United States
Nat'l Corn Growers Ass’n v. Baker, 840 F.2d 1547, 1555 (Fed.Cir.1988) (emphasis added); see also Miller & Co. v. United States, 824 F.2d 961, 963 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 , 108 S.Ct. 773 , 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolverine Tube (Canada), Inc. v. United States
Compare Miller & Co. v. United States, 824 F.2d 961 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 , 108 S.Ct. 773 , 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988), and Hylsa, S.A de C.V. v. United States, 21 CIT —, 960 F.Supp. 320 (1997), aff'd, 135 F.3d 778 , 1998 WL 56389 (Fed.Cir.1998), with Techsnabexport, Ltd. v. United States, 16 CIT 420 , 795 F.Supp. 428 (1992), and Makita Corp. v. United States, 17 CIT 240 , 819 F.Supp. 1099 (1993). *412 I The plaintiff commenced this action on the eve of a deadline to supplement the record of an ITA administrative review of Antidump-ing Duty Order; Brass Sheet and Strip From …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Conoco, Inc. v. The United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board
See, e.g., Miller & Co. v. United States, 824 F.2d 961 , 963 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 , 108 S.Ct. 773 , 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board
See, e.g., Miller & Co. v. United States, 824 F.2d 961 , 963 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 , 108 S.Ct. 773, 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Brown
No. 87-922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Court of International Trade (2)
Petition for writ of mandamus denied.