green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Brewton
But see United States v. Chagra, 807 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1986) (holding that a person could impulsively plan and conspire to commit a murder without premeditating), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Warren v. Pataki
See United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 778 (2d Cir.) (a “failure to object at trial” to a jury instruction “result[s] in a waiver of any claim of error on appeal”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Modafferi
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 494 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 66 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Krevsky v. United States
See United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774 , 782 n. 9 (2d Cir.) (“As a general rule, even when a sentencing judge has been shown to have held erroneous views or made incorrect findings ... resentencing before a different judge is required only in the rare instance in which the judge’s fairness or *241 the appearance of the judge’s fairness is seriously in doubt.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carroll Jackson Nadine Jackson v. Jon Sanford, Attorney Henry Wilkerson, Judge William Bullock, Judge
See Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 1075-78 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), cited with approval by, Moses v. Parwatikar, 813 F.2d 891, 893 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 108 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Glenn R. Waite, M.D. v. Judge Richard D. Sievers Judge D. Nick Caporale Lanet S. Asmussen
See Moses v. Parwatikar, 813 F.2d 891, 892-93 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Glenn Ronald Waite v. Judge Sievers
See Moses v. Parwatikar, 813 F.2d 891, 892-93 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Joel Alan Schnur v. Gm Hughes Electronics Hughes Aircraft Co.
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 493 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harris
Barker v. United States, 7 F.3d 629, 633 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 939 , 127 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994); see United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 494 (9th Cir.1987) (ineffective assistance of counsel claim failed because even if attorney misinformed defendant regarding consecutive versus concurrent aspect of sentence, the district court adequately informed defendant of the maximum possible penalty), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 66 (1987); cf. Del Rosario, 902 F.2d at 59 (holding counsel’s failure to advise of collateral consequences of guilty…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rindley v. Gallagher
See Moses v. Parwatikar, 813 F.2d 891, 892 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 108 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987) (court appointed psychiatrist entitled to absolute immunity); Betten-court, 904 F.2d at 785 (consultants and advisors to administrative boards granted absolute immunity); Kutilek v. Gannon, 766 F.Supp. 967, 973 (D.Kan.1991) (physicians retained by state medical board to serve as consultants regarding disciplinary actions).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Lamar Johnson, Jr., United States of America v. William Lamar Johnson, Jr.
See id. 5 Johnson has not shown "exceptional circumstances" why this issue was not raised below.
cited
Cited "see"
Chris Christoff v. United States
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 494 (9th Cir.) (declarations in open court entitled to a presumption of verity), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miguel Angel Gonzalez v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 494 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 66 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Saknikent
See United States v. McCabe, 812 F.2d 1060, 1061-62 , (8th Cir.) (involuntariness of seizure determined by the will of a responsible parent or guardian as to victim’s well-being when “the victim is of such an age or mental condition as to be incapable of having a recognizable will” or of “understand[ing] the concept of kidnapping and its potential relevance to his or her situation”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 108 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerard Lamont Nelson, United States of America v. Raymond David White
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 493 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 66 (1987); but see, United States v. Anderson, 993 F.2d 1435, 1437 (9th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Lugo-Hernandez
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 494 (9th Cir.1986) (ineffective assistance claim failed because even if attorney misinformed defendant regarding consecutive versus concurrent aspect of sentence, the district court adequately informed the defendant of the maximum possible penalty), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987); see also United States v. Turner, 881 F.2d 684 (9th Cir.) (when attorney incorrectly calculates the sentence, the guilty plea is not rendered involuntary if the defendant was advised of the maximum penalty and the sentence imposed does not exceed that maximum penalty),…
cited
Cited "see"
Charles M. Byers v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
See United States v. Rubulcada, 811 F.2d 491 , 493 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raul M. Ramos
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 493 (9th Cir.) (declining to consider defendant's argument for first time on appeal that district court failed to establish factual basis for guilty plea), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987); see also United States v. Winslow, 962 F.2d 845, 849 (9th Cir.1992) (generally this court will not consider an issue raised for first time on a appeal). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joey Toledo A/K/A Joey Toreneda
See United States v. McCabe, 812 F.2d 1060, 1061 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 108 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987); Chancey, 715 F.2d at 546 ; United States v. Macklin, 671 F.2d 60, 64 (2d Cir.1982); United States v. McBryar, 553 F.2d 433, 433 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 862 , 98 S.Ct. 191 , 54 L.Ed.2d 136 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Emilio Hernandez-Valenzuela v. United States
See United States v. Mills, 810 F.2d 907, 909 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987). 4 Appellant also argues that the district court interfered with his sixth amendment right to counsel by failing to grant a further continuance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Onesio Chavez v. United States
See United States v. Mills, 810 F.2d 907, 909 (9th Cir.) (law of the case doctrine provides that reconsideration of claims previously decided should be avoided), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987). 1 4 Chavez argues in the alternative that if there was no government misconduct, his counsel was ineffective.
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis McCabe v. Ron Angelone, Director
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 493 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lanny Ross Moore v. United States
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 493 (9th Cir.) (declining to consider for first time on appeal defendant's argument that district court failed to establish factual basis for guilty plea), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987); see also United States v. Winslow, 962 F.2d 845, 849 (9th Cir.1992) (declining to consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal). 8 Therefore, the district court did not err by finding that Moore's sentence did not violate the Constitution or laws of the United States.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Feigenbaum
See United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 782 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987). *233 The only issues that the defendant raised at the time of sentencing concerned the maximum statutory penalty and the time period during which he committed the narcotics offense.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Max Chaikin, United States of America v. Marvin D. Gitelson
See United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 782 (2d Cir.) (not every technical violation of the rule mandates resentencing), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987); United States v. Poor Thunder, 810 F.2d 817, 826 (9th Cir.1987) (Rule 32 should not be turned “into a vehicle for verbal quibbles or argumentation about phrasing”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Perrone, Ramon Emilio Gomez, and Israel Perez, Antonio Perrone and Ramon Emilio Gomez
See United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 779 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987); United States v. Jackson, 805 F.2d 457, 461 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 922 , 107 S.Ct. 1384 , 94 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Gelb
See United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774 , 782 n. 9 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987); United States v. Robin, 553 F.2d 8, 10 (2d Cir.1977) (per curiam) (in banc).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blocker
See United States v. Hughes, supra. See generally United States v. McCabe, 812 F.2d 1060, 1062 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 108 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jablonski
See United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 493 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987). 1 11 (ii) Did the district court violate Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(6) and Federal Rule of Evidence 410? 12 a.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carrubba v. Moskowitz
Ed. 2d 128 (1976) (immunity extended to state prosecutor); see also Moses v. Parwatikar, 813 F.2d 891 (8th Cir.) (immunity extended to court-appointed psychiatrist), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S. Ct. 108 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Niblack
See, e.g., Moses v. Parwatikar, 813 F.2d 891, 892 (8th Cir.), cert. denied. 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 108 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987) (psychiatrist); Myers v. Morris, 810 F.2d 1437, 1467 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 828 , 108 S.Ct. 97 , 98 L.Ed.2d 58 (1987) (therapists in child sexual abuse case); Burkes v. Callion, supra [ 433 F.2d 318 ] at 319 [(9th Cir.1970)] (psychiatrists); Bartlett v. Weimer, 268 F.2d 860, 862 (7th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 938 , 80 S.Ct. 380 , 4 L.Ed.2d 358 (1960) (physicians); Williams v. Rappeport, 699 F.Supp. 501, 507-508 (D.Md.1988) (psychiatrist and psychol…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralfiki Lamar Johnson
Based upon this record, we are satisfied that Johnson's plea represented "'a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant."' Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 56 (1985) (quoting North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970)); see also United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 494 (9th Cir.) (sworn statements made by a defendant in open court during plea proceedings "carry a strong presumption of verity"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987). 8 In his supplemental brief, Johnson appears to claim that his plea was involuntary because his attorney p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lythgoe v. Guinn
See, e.g., Grimm v. Arizona Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 115 Ariz. 260 , 564 P.2d 1227, 1233 (1977) (participants in legal proceedings enjoy absolute judicial immunity); Seibel v. Kemble, 63 Haw. 516 , 631 P.2d 173, 177 (1981) (psychiatrists appointed by court to render opinion regarding defendant's mental condition accorded absolute judicial immunity; such persons act as "arm of the court” and perform "functions essential to judicial process”); Delbridge v. Shaeffer, 238 N.J.Super. 323 , 569 A.2d 872, 880-82 (Law Div.1989) (psychologist, adoption resource center, and child placement review b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Akbarnia v. Deming
See, e.g., Moses v. Parwatikar, 813 F.2d 891, 892 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 108 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987); Williams v. Rappeport, 699 F.Supp. 501, 507 (D.Md.1988); Lavit v. Superior Court, 173 Ariz. 96, 99 , 839 P.2d 1141, 1144 (Ct.App.1992); Awai v. Kotin, — P.2d-,-, 1993 WL 477519 at *3 (Colo.Ct.App., 1993); S.T.J. v. P.M., 556 So.2d 244, 246 (La.Ct.App.1990); Gallion v. Woytassek, 244 Neb. 15 , 504 N.W.2d 76, 84 (1993). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwin Seda
(2×)
See United States v. Woodward, 469 U.S. at 108 , 105 S.Ct. at 612 ; see also United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 780 (2d Cir.) (applying Blockburger test and holding that defendant could be convicted of violating both § 1014 and 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (b) (bank larceny), even though both offenses were proven through the same facts), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel Fernandez-Angulo
Compare United States v. Serino, 835 F.2d 924, 932 (1st Cir.1987) and United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 782 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987) (holding resentencing is not always required) with United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1483 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) and United States v. Lawal, 810 F.2d 491, 492-93 (5th Cir.1987) and United States v. O'Neill, 767 F.2d 780, 787 (11th Cir.1985) (holding that resentencing is required).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gina Antoinette Browner
(2×)
LaFave & A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law §§ 7.1(a) & 7.9 (1986) (hereinafter LaFave & Scott); see also United States v. Chagra, 638 F.Supp. 1389, 1397-99 (W.D.Tex.), aff'd, 807 F.2d 398 (5th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 106 , 98 L.Ed.2d 66 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward A. Thomas
(2×)
See also United States v. Chagra, 807 F.2d 398 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 106 , 98 L.Ed.2d 66 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ball
v.
White, Warden
v.
White, Warden
No. 86-6705.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.