green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Story
We think it is more respectful both to Story’s “substantial rights” as well as to the “integrity . . . of judicial proceedings,” McIntosh, 484 U.S. at 836, if we assume that it was.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Story
We think it is more respectful both to Story’s “substantial rights” as well as to the “integrity ... of judicial proceedings,” McLindon, 484 U.S. at 836, 108 S.Ct. 118 , if we assume that it was.
cited
Cited "see"
Ruiz v. Harmon
See United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805, 806 (8th Cir. 1986) (per curiam), cert denied, 484 U.S. 836 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Jodi M. Carlson v. Hyundai Motor Co.
See United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805, 806 (8th Cir. 1986) (standard of review), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Jodi Michaelle Carlson v. Hyundai Motor Company Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
See United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805, 806 (8th Cir.1986) (standard of review), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 , 108 S.Ct. 117 , 98 L.Ed.2d 76 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moseanko
See United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805, 806 (8th Cir. 1986) (per curiam) (Rule 60(b) provides extraordinary relief and denial of motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
See Dugger v. Adams, --- U.S. ----, n. 3, 109 S.Ct. 1211, n. 3 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989). 13 However, we effectively reached a different conclusion in our recent decision in Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593, 596 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 , 108 S.Ct. 116 , 98 L.Ed.2d 74 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Wellington
See, e.g., United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805, 807 (8th Cir.1986) (affirming the issuance of a writ of assistance to put a purchaser in possession after a foreclosure sale because the purchaser was clearly entitled to possession of the property), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Robert-Surzano
(2×)
See id.; see also United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805, 807 (8th Cir. 1986) (“The district court correctly granted the writ because the government. .. was .. . entitled to possession of the property.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 , 108 S. Ct. 117 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Zavaras
See also Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593, 596-97 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 , 108 S.Ct. 116 , 98 L.Ed.2d 74 (1987) (en banc) (holding Caldwell not violated where prosecutor told jurors that' they were “part of the process” and were “not functioning as individuals”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Sweeney
See, e.g., United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805 (8th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 836 , 108 S.Ct. 117 , 98 L.Ed.2d 76 (1987); Pugh v. Farmers Home Admin., 846 F.Supp. 60, 61 (M.D.Fla.1994), aff'd, 74 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of Comfed Savings Bank, F.A. v. Rhetta B. Sweeney and John Sweeney, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of Comfed Savings Bank, F.A. v. Rhetta B. Sweeney, John Sweeney and John Does I-V
See, e.g., United States v. Young, 806 F.2d 805 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 , 108 S.Ct. 117 , 98 L.Ed.2d 76 (1987); Pugh v. Farmers Home Admin., 846 F.Supp. 60, 61 (M.D.Fla.1994), aff'd, 74 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cabal
v.
Envirodyne Engineers, Inc.
v.
Envirodyne Engineers, Inc.
No. 86-6948.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
484 U.S. 836
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.