green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“a Brady violation does not arise if, with reasonable diligence, [defendant] could have obtained the information”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robinson v. Howell
the nub of a substantive due process claim is that some things the state just cannot do, no matter how much process it provides
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. MacDonald
a brady violation does not arise if, with reasonable diligence, could have obtained the information
cited
Cited "see"
Sneed v. State
See United States v. Castro , 813 F.2d 571 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987); United States v. Mussleen , 35 F.3d 692 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Croft
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97 , 104 & n.5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987); see also Bruneau, 131 N.H. at 115 , 552 A.2d at 592 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marder
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97 , ___ _____________ _______ 100 (1st Cir.) (describing errors suitable for reversal under plain error doctrine), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987). _____ ______ On the civil side we recently held, following circuit precedent, that: The "plain error" rule "'should be applied sparingly and only in exceptional cases or under peculiar circumstances to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice.'' Wells Real Estate, 850 F.2d at 809 ___________________ (quoting Nimrod v. Sylvester, 369 F.2d ____________________ 870, 873 (1st Cir. 1966)); see Elgabri, ___ _______…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marder
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 100 (1st Cir.) (describing errors suitable for reversal under plain error doctrine), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goldman
See ___ id. (maximum of life if prior drug felony). ___ Later in the same day, the prosecutor realized his mistake and filed a motion pursuant to Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Holmquist
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 104-06 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Holmquist
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 104-06 (1st ___ _____________ _______ Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohamad Mussaleen, Also Known as Johnny, and Sean Courtney McKinnon Hubert Terence Gill
See United States v. Castro, 813 F.2d 571, 576 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edgar Montoya
See United States v. Nickens, 955 F.2d 112, 118 (1st Cir.1992) (quoting United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 100 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. *3 137, 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987)), petition for cert, filed (U.S. Apr. 27, 1992) (No. 91-8104). 6 The sentencing judge is vested with wide discretion to determine the information on which sentencing guideline decisions will be based, Figaro, 935 F.2d at 8 , and may consider reliable hearsay evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Saver Hodge-Balwing A/K/A Balwin Hodge
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 99 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston University
(2×)
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 875 F.2d 927, 933 (1st Cir.1989) (absent plain error, failure to raise objection in district court deprives appellant of right to raise matter on appeal) (citing United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 99-100 (1st Cir.) cert denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987); United States v. Krynicki, 689 F.2d 289, 291 (1st Cir.1982)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard A. Nazzaro
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 99-100 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America v. David Rash
See United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 100 (1st Cir.) (defining “plain error"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987); see also United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152 , 163 n. 14, 102 S.Ct. 1584 , 1592 n. 14, 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982) (plain-error doctrine to be invoked "sparingly” and only to avert "miscarriage of justice”). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gill v. Thomas
We require this renewal in order to give the district court an opportunity to "reconsider the ruling with the concrete evidence presented in the actual context of the trial." Fusco, 11 F.3d at 262 ; see also United States v. _____ ___ ____ _____________ Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 105 (1st Cir.) (holding that "to raise _______ and preserve for review the claim of [evidentiary error], a party must obtain the order admitting or excluding the controversial evidence in the actual setting of the trial"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martin
See, e.g., United States v. Griffin, ___ ____ _____________ _______ 818 F.2d 97, 105 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 _____ ______ (1987) (holding that a motion in limine, even one raised __ ______ during trial, does not preserve an issue for appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martin
See, e.g., United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 105 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987) (holding that a motion in limine, even one raised during trial, does not preserve an issue for appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kon Yu-Leung, Also Known as Johnny Kon, John Ruotolo
Because “an appellate court [cannot] review a trial court’s balancing of probative value and prejudice without reference to the witness’s actual testimony,” a defendant must both confront and challenge an adverse evidentiary decision at trial “ ‘to raise and preserve for review1 the correctness of this ruling.” Id. (quoting Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 43 , 105 S.Ct. 460, 464 , 83 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984)); see also United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 105 (1st Cir.) (holding “that to raise and preserve for review the claim of improperly constructing the rule 403 balance, a …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rahman
See, e.g., United States v. Castro, 813 F.2d 571, 578 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunnewell v. Warden, Maine
See, e.g., Miller v. Henman, 804 F.2d ___ ____ ______ ______ 421, 427 (7th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987) ____________ (documents designed to guide prison staff, rather than to create claims of entitlement, do not establish a liberty interest).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunnewell v. Warden, Maine
See, e.g., Miller v. Henman, 804 F.2d 421, 427 (7th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987) (documents designed to guide prison staff, rather than to create claims of entitlement, do not establish a liberty interest). 13 Because the magistrate judge did not address whether Maine correctional policies create an enforceable interest in work-related good time credits, and the issue has not been fully briefed, we have concluded that the best course is to remand the case for further proceedings on this issue.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brennan
See id.; see also Boylan, 898 F.2d at ___ ___ ___ ____ ______ 249 ("The [plain error] doctrine does not allow litigants to be relieved from the `ordinary backfires . . . which may mar a trial record.'") (quoting United States v. Griffin, 818 ______________ _______ F.2d 97, 100 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987)). _____ ______ We find that the incident at issue, if erroneous, falls far short of the plain error threshold. -16- 16 her, (2) the testimony of Donald Moscone regarding an outstanding promissory note Brennan had given him, and (3) the testimony of K.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James F. Brennan, United States v. J. Edward McHugh
See id.; see also Boylan, 898 F.2d at 249 ("The [plain error] doctrine does not allow litigants to be relieved from the ‘ordinary backfires ... which may mar a trial record.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 100 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brennan
See id.; see also Boylan, 898 F.2d at 249 ("The [plain error] doctrine does not allow litigants to be relieved from the `ordinary backfires . . . which may mar a trial record.'") (quoting United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 100 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez Molina
Under such circumstances, we can vacate the defendants’ convictions on this ground only if the record reveals plain error. 5 See Per *716 kins, 926 F.2d at 1283 ; see also United States v. Griffin, 818 F.2d 97, 99-100 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 137 , 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987); Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel Reyes, A/K/A Jose Konig Mangele, Etc.
(4×)
Therefore, Reyes could not have had a legitimate expectation of privacy at the time of the search. 11 See United States v. Larson, 760 F.2d 852, 854-55 (8th Cir.) (no legitimate expectation of privacy at time of search when rental period elapsed and defendant did not sufficiently communicate with motel personnel his intention to renew term), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 849 , 106 S.Ct. 143 , 88 L.Ed.2d 119 (1985); see also United States v. Ramirez, 810 F.2d 1338, 1341 (5th Cir.) (no reasonable expectation of privacy in hotel room after rental period expired), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie Joihner v. Stephen L. McEvers Captain Hockaday, and M. Spinner Jones
See also Miller v. Henman, 804 F.2d 421, 424 (7th Cir.1986) (“The existence of substantive criteria is compatible with unfettered discretion to disregard the criteria.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844 , 108 S.Ct. 136 , 98 L.Ed.2d 93 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griffin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-7145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Indiana (1) · E.D. North Carolina (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.