green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Moss v. Miller County Detention Center
See Dickerson v. State of Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir.) (detainee's “petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is improper because that section applies only to posttrial situations and affords relief to a petitioner ‘in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court’ ”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
See United States v. Tootle, 65 F.3d 381, 383 (4th Cir. 1995) (citing Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 P.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
Cureton v. Bodiford
See Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Freddie Tilmon
See United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111, 1114 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodhouse v. United States
United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 14 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 890 , 110 S.Ct. 233 , 107 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); accord, United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111, 1115 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 351 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987). 8 There is no doubt in the mind of this judge that Woodhouse’s total sentence was based on a sentencing package scheme.
cited
Cited "see"
Alton v. United States
See United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111, 1115-16 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct 351 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyrone Nichols v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052, 1055 (2d Cir.) ("Any circumstance that aids the sentencing court in deriving a more complete and true picture regarding the convicted person's background, history, or behavior is properly considered."), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 350 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987). 18 In addition, Nichols may not, in his post-conviction motion, ask us to revisit the sentencing court's calculation of the amount of the drugs simply by framing it as a due process argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Saucier v. Alcede
See Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. John Simonet, Director of Corrections, Denver County Jail, Denver, Colorado Gale A. Norton, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. State of Colorado John Simonet, Director of Corrections, Denver County Jail, Denver, Colorado, Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. John Simonet, Director of Corrections, Denver County Jail, Denver, Colorado Gale A. Norton, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. State of Colorado John Simonet, Director of Corrections, Denver County Jail, Denver, Colorado, Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. John Simonet, Director of Corrections, Denver County Jail, Denver, Colorado Department of Corrections State of Colorado, Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Frank Gunter, Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections
See Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 226 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Alan Grote v. Dale Copeland
See United States v. McGovern, 822 F.2d 739, 744 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987) (stating that the parties are bound by their obligations under the plea agreement, including the defendant's plea of guilty, unless and until the court rejects the plea); cf. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(2) (allowing a district court to defer its acceptance or rejection of a plea until it considers the presentence report). 19 In asserting that the trial court's acceptance of his plea when he failed to appear was unlawful, Grote effectively contends that he had an unfettered right to conte…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrozza
See U.S.S.G. 3D1.4 ___ (instructions on determining the combined offense level). -31- sentencing court in determining sentence") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987). ____________ We conclude that the principles put forward by the district court provide no adequate reason for limiting relevant conduct to charged predicate acts in RICO cases.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrozza
See U.S.S.G. 3D1.4 (instructions on determining the combined offense level). -31- sentencing court in determining sentence") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. United States
See United States v. Mancari, 914 F.2d 1014, 1018-22 (7th Cir.1990) (emphasizing importance of allowing judge to “effectuate the original sentencing intent”) (quoting United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111, 1113 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 351 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987)); Kelly v. Neubert, supra, 898 F.2d at 18 ; United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 14 (1st Cir.1989) (where multi-count indictment, and part or all of conviction vacated, judge “should be free to review efficacy of what remains in light of the original plan ... to ensure that the punishment still…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vasquez
See United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir.) (preponderance standard to be applied at hearing where parties dispute presentence report), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 350 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Young
Accord, United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111, 1115 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 351 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnny Dickerson v. William J. Guste, Jr., Louisiana State Attorney General
(2×)
See Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 221-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 352 , 98 L.Ed.2d 378 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Linda S. Holloway
See United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052, 1056-57 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Terzado-Madruga
See United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052 (2nd Cir.) (adopting the preponderance of evidence standard for federal sentencing fact-finding), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 350 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Veronica Marshall, United States of America v. Kevin Morse
See United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052, 1055 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William M. Carroll
See United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052, 1057 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 350 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987); United States v. Fernandez-Vidana, 857 F.2d 673, 675 (9th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nelson
See United States v. McGovern, 822 F.2d 739, 744 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 352 , 98 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
CLARENCE STEWART, JR v. BURL CAIN, Acting Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
See Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 225 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Troy Whitehead v. Chadwick Dotson
Id.; see also Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220 , 225– 226 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. Kansas, State of
Id. at 1261; see also Green, 1994 WL 83299 , at *1 (“Pre-trial habeas relief is not available to consider a claim that the state is barred from trying petitioner because it violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.”) (citing Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 226 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987)); Forney v. State of Oklhamona, 1998 WL 840941, at *1 (10th Cir. 1998) (stating that state pretrial detainee may bring a federal habeas action to demand enforcement of the state’s obligation to bring him promptly to trial, but “he may not seek habeas relief to forest…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond v. Shue
See also Dickerson v. State of Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 225 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 352 , 98 L.Ed.2d 378 (1978) (“Despite the absence of an exhaustion requirement in the statutory language of section 2241(c)(3), a body of case law has developed holding that although section 2241 establishes jurisdiction in the federal courts to consider pre-trial habeas corpus petitions, federal courts should abstain from the exercise of that jurisdiction if the issues raised in the petition may be resolved either by trial on the merits in the state court or by other state pro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Abram
See, e.g., United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111, 1113-14 (7th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987); United States v. Handa, 122 F.3d 690, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); United States v. Townsend, 178 F.3d 558, 567 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson Frias
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052, 1057 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 350 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kent E. Gray
See, e.g., United States v. Shue, 766 F.2d 1122 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 351 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987) (joinder of bank robberies proper).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ken Smith
(2×)
Compare United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111, 1113 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 351 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987) (trial court has inherent power to resentence in order to effectuate original sentencing intent). 49 The case before us is distinct from those cited in DiFrancesco.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williamsburg Check Cashing Corp., Aaron Weiss and Herman Lebowitz
Such an agreement to keep the judge ignorant of pertinent information cannot be enforceable, because a sentencing court “must be permitted to consider any and all information that reasonably might bear on the proper sentence for the particular defendant, given the crime committed.” Wasman v. United States, 468 U.S. 559, 563 , 104 S.Ct. 3217, 3220 , 82 L.Ed.2d 424 (1984); see also United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 1052, 1055 (2d Cir.) (sentencing court “is required to assure itself that the information upon which it relies when fixing sentence is reliable and accurate”), cert. denied, 484 …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hallam
See also United States v. Shue, 825 F.2d 1111 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 484 U.S. 956 , 108 S.Ct. 351 , 98 L.Ed.2d 376 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dickerson
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
No. 87-5549.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1987.
484 U.S. 956
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.