green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. O'DONNELL
But cf. State v. Bryant, 217 N.J.Super. 72, 81 (App.Div.1987) (finding that binding and gagging elderly victims during robbery did not make them more vulnerable than robbery itself), certif. denied, 108 N.J. 202 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed.2d 488 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bloomer v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Puleo, 817 F.2d 702, 706 (11th Cir.) (persons whose surnames begin with the letters M through Z found not to constitute a distinct class), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 491 , 98 L.Ed.2d 489 (1987); Krause v. Chartier, 406 F.2d 898, 901 (1st Cir.1968) (no prejudice found to result from venire consisting entirely of persons with surnames beginning with the letters T through Z), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969). [¶ 16] Finally, we take note that in United States v. Puleo, 817 F.2d 702, 706 (11th Cir. 1987), the court held: Puleo's c…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Drury
See State v. Bryant, 217 N.J.Super. 72, 84 , 524 A. 2d 1291 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 108 N.J. 202 , 528 A. 2d 24 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 488 (1987) (no presumptive sentence for kidnapping); State v. Zadoyan, 290 N.J.Super. 280, 290 , 675 A. 2d 698 (App.Div.1996) (no presumptive sentence for carjacking).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Doe, James Roe
See United States v. De Los Santos, 810 F.2d 1326, 1334 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed.2d 488 (1987); United States v. Scarpelli, 713 F.Supp. 1144 , 1145-46 n. 2 (N.D.Ill.1989) (closing a pretrial suppression hearing to protect the defendant from “Godfather-style retribution”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunt v. Tucker
(2×)
Accord United States v. De Los Santos, 810 F.2d 1326, 1333 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed.2d 488 (1987). “[T]here can be little doubt that the explicit Sixth Amendment right of the accused is no less protective of a public trial than the implicit First Amendment right of the press and public.” Waller, 467 U.S. at 46 , 104 S.Ct. at 2215 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Lazaro Chica and Ineldo Leo Ramos
The Double Jeopardy Clause grants the criminal defendant a “ “valued right to have his trial completed by a particular tribunal.’” United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470, 484 , 91 S.Ct. 547, 557 , 27 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971) (quoting Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684, 689 , 69 S.Ct. 834, 837 , 93 L.Ed. 974 (1949)); accord United States v. Puleo, 817 F.2d 702, 704 (11th Cir.) (citing Wade, 336 U.S. at 689 , 69 S.Ct. at 837 ), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 491 , 98 L.Ed.2d 489 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Hunt v. State
Accord United States v. De Los Santos, 810 F.2d 1326, 1333 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed.2d 488 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Cast
See United States v. De Los Santos, 810 F.2d 1326, 1337 (5th Cir), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 (1987) (any delay on part of police since receiving tip about defendant’s trip to obtain heroin was justifiable and not merely manufactured exigency, as they had to put defendant under surveillance and corroborate tip; not until defendant arrived at stated destination did they have probable cause to search, and exigency to do so without a warrant); State v. Patten, 457 A.2d 806, 810 (Maine 1983) (while police investigating informant’s tip that defendant would be driving from Limestone to Bangor an…
discussed
Cited "see"
William Jefferson Walker v. B.D. Goldsmith, Robert Corbin
See United States v. Puleo, 817 F.2d 702, 706 (11th Cir.) (persons whose surnames begin with the letters M through Z found not to constitute a distinct class), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 491 , 98 L.Ed.2d 489 (1987); Krause v. Chartier, 406 F.2d 898, 901 (1st Cir.1968) (no prejudice found to result from venire consisting entirely of persons with surnames beginning with the letters T through Z), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. City of Grand Prairie
See United States v. De Los Santos, 810 F.2d 1326, 1336 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed.2d 488 (1987); United States v. Webster, 750 F.2d 307, 323 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1106 , 105 S.Ct. 2340 , 85 L.Ed.2d 855 (1985). . 475 U.S. 335 , 106 S.Ct. 1092 , 89 L.Ed.2d 271 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sonin
However, courts have found that the problem of retaliatory acts is “especially acute in the context of criminal organizations” and, therefore, “it might be within a district court’s discretion to grant closure without evidence of a direct threat or other evidence corroborating a defendant’s subjective fears.” United States v. Doe, 63 F.3d 121, 130 (2d Cir.1995); see also United States v. De Los Santos, 810 F.2d 1326, 1334 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed.2d 488 (1987); United States v. Scarpelli 713 F.Supp. 1144 , 1145-46 n.2 (N.D.I11.1989) (closing …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Presley v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Puleo, 817 F.2d 702 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 491 , 98 L.Ed.2d 489 (1987) (persons with last names “M-Z” not a distinctive group).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Commonwealth
See also United States v. Puleo, 817 F.2d 702, 705 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 491 , 98 L.Ed.2d 489 (1987) (holding that “consent ‘may always be implied from a totality of the circumstances attendant on the declaration of a mistrial’ ”) (quoting United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SA v. State
See Sevion v. State (1993), IndApp., 620 N.E.2d 736, 738 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scott v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert, denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S.A. v. State
See Sevion v. State (1993), Ind.App., 620 N.E.2d 736, 736 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scolt v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert. denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fromal
See, e.g., United States v. De Los Santos, 810 F.2d 1326, 1336 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 490 , 98 L.Ed.2d 488 (1987); United States v. Paradis, 802 F.2d 553, 557 (1st Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crespo
v.
Armontrout, Warden
v.
Armontrout, Warden
No. 87-5670.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1987.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.