green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“the factual determination whether the plea agreement has been breached lies with the trial judge. received the process that was due; he is not entitled to a jury determination of the question.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. John Gerald Gerant, A/K/A Jerry
the factual determination whether the plea agreement has been breached lies with the trial judge. received the process that was due; he is not entitled to a jury determination of the question.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation v. Secretary of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Myers, 484 U.S. at 989, 108 S.Ct. at 479 (1987) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robin Rochelle Lucas
(2×)
See United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 582 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 ; United States v. Aboumoussallem, 726 F.2d 906, 911-912 (2nd Cir.1984); United States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380 (3rd Cir.1991); United States v. Krezdorn, 639 F.2d 1327, 1332-33 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1066 , 104 S.Ct. 1416 , 79 L.Ed.2d 742 (1984); United States v. Morano, 697 F.2d 923, 926 (11th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kimball
See United States v. Page, 828 F.2d 1476, 1478 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Steward v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Hester v. Commonwealth, Ky., 734 S.W.2d 457 , cert. denied (1987), 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 ; Mitchell v. Commonwealth (1989), Ky., 777 S.W.2d 930 ; Dunkle, 602 A.2d 830 . .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edgar Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edward W. Welch, Jr., United States of America v. Arline S. Welch, United States of America v. Kevin Cullinane, United States of America v. Cheryl T. Johnson, United States of America v. Richard F. Labrie, United States of America v. Tony Rood, United States of America v. William D. Wallace, United States of America v. Ernest F. Langlois
See United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 586-87 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sepulveda
See United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 586-87 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
See United States v. ___ _____________ Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 586-87 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, ________________ _____ ______ 484 U.S. 989 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin Patrick McCourt
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 583 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987); United States v. Aboumoussallem, 726 F.2d 906 (2d Cir.1984); United States v. Morano, 697 F.2d 923, 926 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); United States v. Krezdorn, 639 F.2d 1327 (5th Cir.1981). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iona M. Moore
See United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 585-86 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987) (witness’s mental history relevant to credibility only if it bears on witness’s ability to perceive events about which she is testifying).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hewitt
Id.; see United States v. Page, 808 F.2d 723 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 918 , 107 S.Ct. 3195 , 96 L.Ed.2d 683 , and 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987) (dismissal of an indictment is proper only if the prosecutorial misconduct is so flagrant that there was some infringement on the grand jury’s ability to exercise independent judgment).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sophia Gordon
See, e.g., United States v. Page, 828 F.2d 1476 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989, 108 S.Ct. 510, 98 L.Ed.2d 608 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rossetti v. Curran
See also United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 584 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987); Albert v. Montgomery, 782 F.2d 865, 870 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wright
“Courts have found, for example, that impeachment evidence improperly withheld was not material where the testimony of the witness who might have been impeached was strongly corroborated by additional evidence supporting a guilty verdict.” United States v. Weintraub, 871 F.2d 1257, 1262 (5th Cir. 1989); see United States v. Risken, 788 F.2d 1361, 1375 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923 , 107 S.Ct. 329 , 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); see also United States v. Page, 828 F.2d 1476, 1479-80 (10th Cir.) (exculpatory evidence not material where it “would not have mitigated the impact of the tape-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shmuel David, United States of America v. Jaime Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Amparo Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Yehuda Yarden
See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 583 (1st Cir.) ("Rule 404(b) does not exclude evidence of prior crimes of persons other than the defendant."), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David
See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 583 (1st Cir.) (“Rule 404(b) does not exclude evidence of prior crimes of persons other than the defendant.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Barnes
See also United States v. Page, 828 F.2d 1476, 1478 (10th *1524 Cir.1987) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tarrant
See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 578 (1st Cir.), (burden of proof by “adequate evidence”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987); United States v. Skalsky, 616 F.Supp. 676, 681 (D.N.J.1985) (proof by clear and convincing evidence), aff'd, 857 F.2d 172 (3d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stuart H. Newton, United States of America v. Thomas W. Gilbert
See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572, 586-87 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 510 , 98 L.Ed.2d 508 (1987) (discussing witness interview notes as statements within the meaning of § 3500(e)(1)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simmons
v.
Tudor Engineering Co.
v.
Tudor Engineering Co.
No. 87-5870.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.