green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
See United States v. Holley, 826 F.2d 331 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 422 , citing United States v. Benavidez, 664 F.2d 1255 , (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1352 : Benavidez instructs that the goal of Rule 44(c) is to prevent conflicts that may be associated with joint representation.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holmes
See United States v. Holley, 826 F.2d 331 (5 Cir.1987), cert. den. 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 422 , citing United States v. Benavidez, 664 F.2d 1255 , (5 Cir.1982), cert. den. 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 : Benavidez instructs that the goal of Rule 44(c) is to prevent conflicts that may be associated with joint representation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. County of Muskegon
See Price v. Pierce, 823 F.2d 1114 (7th Cir.1987) (holding that applicants for subsidized housing as against the housing developers and IHDA, an agent for HUD, were not mere incidental beneficiaries to contracts to develop low income housing, but they were not entitled to status as parties to the contract because such status would result in untenable position of preventing the government from negotiating unless it received a release from all of the applicants for public housing), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 422 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mccloud v. Testa
See Juarbe-Angueira v. Arias, 831 F.2d 11, 13 (1st Cir.) (Breyer, J.) (distinguishing between category of positions that are mere "jobs for the boys" and positions for which a political broom should be allowed to make a clean sweep), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCloud v. Testa
See Juarbe-Angueira v. Arias, 831 F.2d 11, 13 (1st Cir.) (Breyer, J.) (distinguishing between category of positions that are mere “jobs for the boys” and positions for which a political broom should be allowed to make a clean sweep), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz-Pinero v. Rivera-Arroyo
The Duties Inherent in the OFP Directorship ___________________________________________ Under the second prong, we examine any evidence the defendants may have adduced that "the particular responsibilities __________ ________________ ____________________ 3See id. (noting that the first prong of the Jimenez Fuentes ___ ___ _______________ test was readily met where the municipal department for which plaintiff worked was responsible for developing and implementing public works programs, since "[e]lections often turn on the success or failure of the incumbent [administration] to provide these ser…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz-Pinero v. Rivera-Arroyo
See id. (noting that the first prong of the Jimenez Fuentes test was readily met where the municipal department for which plaintiff worked was responsible for developing and implementing public works programs, since "[ejections often turn on the success or failure of the incumbent [administration] to provide these services”); Jimenez Fuentes, 807 F.2d at 242 (finding that regional director of commonwealth housing department, charged with ameliorating housing conditions among low and middle income families, was a position "relate[d] to partisan political interests”); accord Juarbe-Angueira …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rico
Lyons, 703 F.2d at 820 -21 (quoting Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391, 395 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982)); see United States v. Holley, 826 F.2d 331, 334 (5th Cir.1987) (" 'A conflict of interest is present whenever one defendant stands to gain significantly by counsel adducing probative evidence or advancing plausible arguments that are damaging to the cause of a code-fendant whom counsel is also representing.' ” (quotation omitted) (emphasis added in Holley)), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 422 (1988). 48 . 703 F…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kraemer-Katz v. United States Public Health Service
See Price v. Pierce, 823 F.2d 1114 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 422 (1988); Special Committee on Consumer Affairs, “Remedies Short of Consent or Litigated Orders for Violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act,” 32 Record Ass’n Bar City of NY 622 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sharyn G. Campbell, United States of America v. Gilbert R. Serrano, United States of America v. Emmitt L. Wilson
See United States v. Wolf, 820 F.2d 1499, 1505 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 (1988); accord United States v. Smith, 891 F.2d 703, 710 (9th Cir.1989), amended, 906 F.2d 385 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 47 (1990); cf. United States v. Musacchio, 968 F.2d 782, 789 (9th Cir.1992) (as amended).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cecere v. County of Westchester
See Price v. Pierce, 823 F.2d 1114 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 422 (1988); Guernsey v. Rich Plan of the Midwest, 408 F.Supp. 582 (N.D.Ind.1976); Special Committee on Consumer Affairs, Report, 32 Record of The Ass’n of the Bar of the City of New York 30 (1976); Notes, 94 Yale L.J. 875 (1985); 57 Colum.L.Rev. 406 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Borg v. Department of Revenue
See Andras v. Illinois Dept. of Rev., 154 Ill App 3rd 37, 506 NE2d 439 (1987), cert den 485 US 960 , 108 S Ct 1223 , 99 L Ed 2d 424 (1988); Matz v. Dept. of Treas., 155 Mich App 778 , 401 NW2d 62 (1986); Comm. of Rev. v. Plymouth Home National Bank, 394 Mass 66, 473 NE2d 1139 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Santana v. Calderon
See also Juarbe-Angueira v. Arias, 831 F.2d 11, 15 (1st Cir.1987) cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harvard
See also United States v. Wolf, 820 F.2d 1499, 1504 (9th Cir.1987) (setting forth the elements of a violation of § 1005 as not requiring a finding of materiality), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ortiz-Pinero v. Rivera Acevedo
See also Juarbe-Angueira v. Arias, 831 F.2d 11, 15 (1st Cir.1987) ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Dewey Glock v. Harry K. Singletary
See, e.g., Thompson v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 173, 175 (Fla.1987) (per curiam) (allowing petitioner to bring a Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393 , 107 S.Ct. 1821 , 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987) claim under Rule 3.850 despite State's assertion of procedural default), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1224 , 99 L.Ed.2d 424 (1988); Riley v. Wainwright, 517 So.2d 656, 659 (Fla.1987) (same); O’Malley v. Wainwright, 237 So.2d 813, 817 (Fla.2d Dist.Ct.App.1970) ("The Supreme Court of Florida in Baggett v. Wainwright, [ 229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969)], held that in certain instances habeas corpus may be utilized …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Olano
See, e.g., United States v. Wolf, 820 F.2d 1499, 1505 (9th Cir.1987) (bank’s prior violation of lending limits admissible background evidence bearing on motive and intent in misapplication of funds trial), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1089, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6281, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,701 United States of America v. Guy W. Olano, Jr., United States of America v. Raymond M. Gray
See, e.g., United States v. Wolf, 820 F.2d 1499, 1505 (9th Cir.1987) (bank's prior violation of lending limits admissible background evidence bearing on motive and intent in misapplication of funds trial), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meeks v. Dugger
See, e.g., Thompson v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 173 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1224 , 99 L.Ed.2d 424 (1988); Demps v. Dugger, 514 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1987); Delap v. Dugger, 513 So.2d 659 (Fla. 1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MCorp v. Clarke
See also United States v. Lemaire, 826 F.2d 387, 390 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1223 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988) (5th Circuit recognized that the Comptroller of the Currency is duty-bound “to secure an equitable distribution of bank assets to the creditors of a failed bank”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Breier, 813 F.2d 212, 215 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 960 , 108 S.Ct. 1222 , 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988); United States v. Mechem, 509 F.2d 1193 , 1194 n. 3 (10th Cir.1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holley
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-982.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1988.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.