Engelhartson v. Dep't of Agric., 485 U.S. 990 (1988).

Engelhartson v. Dep't of Agric., 485 U.S. 990 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 5.4 score

115 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 32 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: David W. King v. Jack R. Duckworth (ca7, 1995-10-13)

Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1989 2007 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers. How cited ↗

cited Cited "see" David W. King v. Jack R. Duckworth

7th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high

See Culbert v. Young, 834 F.2d 624, 631 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 (1988).

discussed Cited "see" Townsend v. Commissioner

1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See Puleio v. Vose, 830 F.2d 1197, 1202 (1st Cir. ___ ______ ____ 1987), cert. denied. 485 U.S. 990 (1988). ____________ "[A] federal habeas court may consider a procedurally defaulted claim absent a showing of cause for the default only where the petitioner demonstrates that his is an 'extraordinary case, where a constitutional violation has probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent. . . .'" Hall v. DiPaolo, 986 F.2d 7 , 10 ____ _______ (1st Cir. 1993) (quoting Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. at 496). ______ _______ -3- From the record, it is clear that this is not such …

discussed Cited "see" Townsend v. Commissioner

1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See Puleio v. Vose, 830 F.2d 1197, 1202 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied. 485 U.S. 990 (1988). 5 "[A] federal habeas court may consider a procedurally defaulted claim absent a showing of cause for the default only where the petitioner demonstrates that his is an 'extraordinary case, where a constitutional violation has probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent....' " Hall v. DiPaolo, 986 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir. 1993) (quoting Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. at 496 ).

discussed Cited "see" Sabil M. Mujahid, AKA Terry Smith v. Tera Harper, Chairman Jeffrey Tom, Chairperson Allan Anduha, Lt., Chairperson

9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: accord · confidence high

Accord Culbert v. Young, 834 F.2d 624, 630 (7th Cir.) ("written requirement is necessary to determine whether the committee's decision [is] based on substantial evidence or whether the decision is sufficiently arbitrary so as to be a denial of due process") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 (1988).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Barone

D. Mass. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Armijo, 834 F.2d 132, 134-35 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 and 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1297 , 99 L.Ed.2d 507 (1988); Gambino, 788 F.2d at 948-949 ; United States v. Stratton, 779 F.2d 820, 831 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1162 , 106 S.Ct. 2285 , 90 L.Ed.2d 726 and 477 U.S. 906 , 106 S.Ct. 3277 , 91 L.Ed.2d 567 (1986); United States v. Ga- *1022 bay, 923 F.2d 1536, 1543 (11th Cir.1991); Federal Criminal Code and Rules (West 1993) “Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules” 1983 Amendment, Rule 23(b) at 95 (substitution of juror alternative was rejected beca…

discussed Cited "see" Ping v. McBride

N.D. Ind. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See Culbert v. Young, 834 F.2d 624 (7th Cir.1987) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 , 108 S.Ct. 1296 , 99 L.Ed.2d 506 (1988); McKinney v. Meese, 831 F.2d 728 (7th Cir.1987) (collecting cases); Wagner v. Williford, 804 F.2d 1012 (7th Cir.1986) (collecting eases).

discussed Cited "see" Akbar v. Gross

E.D. Wis. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See Culbert v. Young, 834 F.2d 624, 628 (7th Cir.1987) (“The adoption of mere procedural guidelines, however, does not give rise to a liberty interest protected under the fourteenth amendment.”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 , 108 S.Ct. 1296 , 99 L.Ed.2d 506 (1988); Shango v. Jurich, 681 F.2d 1091, 1101 (7th Cir.1982) (“a state created procedural right is not itself a liberty interest within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment”).

cited Cited "see" Rogers v. Oestreich

E.D. Wis. · 1990 · signal: accord · confidence high

Accord Culbert v. Young, 834 F.2d 624, 631 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 , 108 S.Ct. 1296 , 99 L.Ed.2d 506 (1988).

discussed Cited "see" Carlos Colon, Cross-Appellant v. Lieutenant Bruce Schneider, Cross-Appellee

7th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high

See Culbert v. Young, 834 F.2d 624, 628 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 , 108 S.Ct. 1296 , 99 L.Ed.2d 506 (1988); Shango, 681 F.2d at 1100-01 (“The argument that the procedures established by the regulation can themselves be considered a liberty interest is analytically indefensible....

discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Chavez

Colo. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low

However, consideration of such evidence "takes on special significance only where the plea agreement is itself ambiguous," or oral statements made to the defendant "add a term inconsistent with the plea agreement." Craig v. People, supra; see also People v. Romero, 745 P.2d 1003 (Colo.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 , 108 S.Ct. 1296 , 99 L.Ed.2d 506 (1988).

cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Houlihan

1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., Puleio v. Vose, 830 F.2d 1197, 1205-07 (1st Cir.1987) (discussing exception for spontaneous exclamations), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 , 108 S.Ct. 1297 , 99 L.Ed.2d 506 (1988).

cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Houlihan

1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., Puleio v. Vose, 830 F.2d 1197, 1205-07 (1st ___ ____ ______ ____ Cir. 1987) (discussing exception for spontaneous exclamations), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 (1988).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Magee v. Harshbarger

1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low

Wainright, 433 U.S. at 87 . -4- 4 Under prevailing habeas corpus jurisprudence, a defendant's failure to comply with a state's contemporaneous objection rule at trial forecloses judicial scrutiny on collateral review if "1) the state in fact has a `contemporaneous objection' rule; 2) the state enforces and does not waive the rule; and 3) the defendant fails to show both `cause' for and `prejudice' from, not having complied with the rule." McCown v. Callahan, 726 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 839 (1984); see also Puleio v. Vose, 830 F.2d 1197, 1199 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, …

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thomas A. Magee v. Scott Harshbarger

1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low

Under prevailing habeas corpus jurisprudence, a defendant’s failure to comply with a state’s contemporaneous objection rule at trial forecloses judicial scrutiny on collateral review if “1) the state in fact has a ‘contemporaneous objection’ rule; 2) the state enforces and does not waive the rule; and 3) the defendant fails to show both ‘cause’ for and ‘prejudice’ from, not having complied with the rule.” McCown v. Callahan, 726 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 839 , 105 S.Ct. 139 , 83 L.Ed.2d 78 (1984); see also Puleio v. Vose, 830 F.2d 1197, 1199 (1st Cir.1987…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Connell