green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton
But see United States v. Tobias, 836 F.2d 449, 451 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1299 , 99 L.Ed.2d 509 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Khademi v. Jimmanz
See Pedraza v. Jones, 71 F.3d 194, 196 (5th 28 Cir. 1995) (“[t]he plain language of section 1915 does not provide for the appointment of expert 1 witnesses to aid an indigent litigant.”); accord, Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 F.2d 468, 474 (3d Cir. 2 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Baker v. McCowan
See Pedraza v. Jones, 71 F.3d 194, 196 (5th 8 Cir. 1995) (“[t]he plain language of section 1915 does not provide for the appointment of expert 9 witnesses to aid an indigent litigant.”); accord, Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 F.2d 468, 474 (3d Cir. 10 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Baker v. McCowan
See Pedraza v. Jones, 71 F.3d 2 194, 196 (5th Cir. 1995) (“[t]he plain language of section 1915 does not provide for the 3 appointment of expert witnesses to aid an indigent litigant.”); accord, Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 4 F.2d 468, 474 (3d Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kujawa
See Bell v. United States, 349 U.S. 81 , 75 S.Ct. 620 , 99 L.Ed. 905 (1955), and United States v. Esch, 832 F.2d 531, 541 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 908 , 108 S.Ct. 1084 , 99 L.Ed.2d 242 (1988), and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1299 , 99 L.Ed.2d 509 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rudolph R. Nordquest
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 767 (9th Cir.1987)., cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988). 3 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Lacy v. Berge
See Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 F.2d 468, 473 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 764 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orvel G. Spence
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 763-64 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Samuel, Jr.
United States v. Giunta, 925 F.2d 758, 764 (4th Cir.1991); see United States v. Meredith, 824 F.2d 1418, 1428 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 969 (1987), 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Todd Hayes, United States of America v. Keith Hayes
See United States v. Meredith, 824 F.2d 1418, 1428 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 969 (1987), 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Edwin Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Esch, 832 F.2d 531, 541-42 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 908 and 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Rufus A. Averhart, Also Known as Zolo Agona Azania v. John T. Shettle
See Williams v. Burlington N., Inc., 832 F.2d 100, 102 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barone
See United States v. Armijo, 834 F.2d 132, 134-35 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 990 and 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1297 , 99 L.Ed.2d 507 (1988); Gambino, 788 F.2d at 948-949 ; United States v. Stratton, 779 F.2d 820, 831 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1162 , 106 S.Ct. 2285 , 90 L.Ed.2d 726 and 477 U.S. 906 , 106 S.Ct. 3277 , 91 L.Ed.2d 567 (1986); United States v. Ga- *1022 bay, 923 F.2d 1536, 1543 (11th Cir.1991); Federal Criminal Code and Rules (West 1993) “Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules” 1983 Amendment, Rule 23(b) at 95 (substitution of juror alternative was rejected beca…
discussed
Cited "see"
Tabron v. Grace
See Moss v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 83 F.R.D. 624, 625 (E.D.Va.1979) (quoting Haymes v. Smith, 73 F.R.D. 572, 574 (W.D.N.Y.1976)). 50 In Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 F.2d 468 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988), we rejected an indigent civil litigant's argument that the district court erred in refusing to have the government pay for an expert medical witness.
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. National Football League
Id. ¶ 3.4, at 1411-12; see Williams v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 832 F.2d 100, 104 (7th Cir.1987) (although plaintiff did not have the right to opt out, court “provided [plaintiff] with the equivalent due process protection that would be accorded to a Rule (23)(b)(3) class member”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988); cf. Robertson v. National Basketball Ass’n, 556 F.2d 682 , 685-86 (2d Cir.1977) (discussing due process rights of mandatory class members prior to Shutts).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray Houston
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 763 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alphonse Cuozzo, United States of America v. Robert Frank Stella, Jr., United States of America v. Karin Susan Monari
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 762-763 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dirk Francis Jennings, John Daniel Cornwell, Jr., United States of America v. Jason Coler Nichols, Jose Luis Casas, Angela Mary Casas
See United States v. Tobias, 836 F.2d 449, 453 (9th Cir.) (affidavit of FBI agent declaring that no electronic surveillance of defendant occurred complied with government’s disclosure obligation under 18 U.S.C. § 3504 ), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1299 , 99 L.Ed.2d 509 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Antonio Pons
See U.S. v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 766 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988); U.S. v. Valle-Valdez, 554 F.2d 911 (9th Cir.1977). 16 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hilario Rios-Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Aispuro-Lopez
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 765-66 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988) (a conviction will be sustained if nonconstitutional error more probably than not had no material effect on the outcome).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walker Bennett Monroe
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 766 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
See Williams v. Burlington N., Inc., 832 F.2d 100, 104 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Neal
See United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 765 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988); United States v. Boschetti, 794 F.2d 416, 418-19 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 889 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rushing v. Wayne County
(2×)
See Boring v Kozakiewicz, 833 F2d 468 (CA 3, 1987), cert den 485 US 991 (1988); Whisenant v Yuam, 739 F2d 160 (CA 4, 1984); Jones v Johnson, 781 F2d 769 (CA 9, 1986); Garcia v Salt Lake Co, 768 F2d 303 (CA 10, 1985); Hamm v DeKalb Co, 774 F2d 1567 (CA 11, 1985), cert den 475 US 1076 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. Steele
(2×)
If certain requirements are met, a person may not be prosecuted under Sec. 1001 for making a false exculpatory response to government investigators."); accord United States v. Olsowy, 836 F.2d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1987) ("The exception allows a suspect who is in custody to deny involvement in the crime for which he was arrested without incurring additional criminal penalties."), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1299 , 99 L.Ed.2d 509 (1988); United States v. Tabor, 788 F.2d 714, 715 (11th Cir.1986) ("[T]he federal courts have held that in some circumstances false statements exculpatory in na…
cited
Cited "see"
People of the Territory of Guam v. Vincent T. Tedtaotao
See United States v. Olsowy, 836 F.2d 439, 443 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1299 , 99 L.Ed.2d 509 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norman E. Tedder v. Edward Odel, Cpl., James Scott McAlister
See Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 F.2d 468, 474 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988); Johnson v. Hubbard, 698 F.2d 286, 289 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 917 , 104 S.Ct. 282 , 78 L.Ed.2d 260 (1983); McNeil v. Lowney, 831 F.2d 1368, 1373 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 965 , 108 S.Ct. 1236 , 99 L.Ed.2d 435 (1988); United States Marshals Serv. v. Means, 741 F.2d 1053 , 1056 (8th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart v. Rubin
See, e.g., Williams v. Burlington, Northern, Inc., 832 F.2d 100, 104 (7th Cir.1987) (even though plaintiff did not have right to opt out, court “provided [plaintiff] with the equivalent due process protection that would be accorded to a Rule (23)(b)(3) class member”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988); National Football League, 822 F.Supp. at 1411-12 . 54.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rowe
“In reviewing evidentiary rulings under Rule 609(a), broad discretion should be given to the trial court and its decisions should not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.” United States v. Turner, 995 F.2d 1357, 1363 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 904 , 114 S.Ct. 282 , 126 L.Ed.2d 232 (1993); see also United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 762 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 419, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6003, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9807 United States of America v. Jerome Fitzgerald Rowe, Aka: Jerome Rowe
"In reviewing evidentiary rulings under Rule 609(a), broad discretion should be given to the trial court and its decisions should not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion." United States v. Turner, 995 F.2d 1357, 1363 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 904 , 114 S.Ct. 282 , 126 L.Ed.2d 232 (1993); see also United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 762 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988). 23 The district court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to allow Rowe to impeach Wilson with her theft conviction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Elizaha Dixon, Aka: Robert E. Dixon
See United States v. Michlin, 34 F.3d 896, 900-01 (9th Cir.1994); see also United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 767 (9th Cir.1987) (noting that when it amended § 924(c), Congress expressly intended to authorize an "additional, cumulative sentence" for persons who also violate § 2113), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Smith, A/K/A Shorty Stupid, A/K/A Little Rock, United States of America v. Mitchell Van Horne A/K/A Twin, United States of America v. Raynaldo Brandon, A/K/A Nardo, A/K/A Naldo
That argument is simply contradicted by the last sentence of the rule, which gives the trial court discretion on whether to award additional challenges: "If there is more than one defendant, the court may allow the defendants additional peremptory challenges and permit them to be exercised separately or jointly." Id. (emphasis added); see also United States v. Meredith, 824 F.2d 1418, 1423 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 969 (1987), and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smith
That argument is simply contradicted by the last sentence of the rule, which gives the trial court discretion on whether to award additional challenges: "If there is more than one defendant, the court may allow the defendants additional peremptory challenges and permit them to be exercised separately or jointly." Id. (emphasis added); see also United States v. Meredith, 824 F.2d 1418, 1423 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 969 (1987), and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Shawnee Library System
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 173 , 94 S.Ct. 2140, 2150 , 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974); Gert v. Elgin Nat'l Indus., Inc., 773 F.2d 154, 159-60 (7th Cir.1985); see also Williams v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 832 F.2d 100, 103 (7th Cir.1987) (discussing notice requirement), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988). 18 On July 15, 1991, the magistrate judge amended his earlier certification in a two-line order at Smith's request, adding "certification under Rule 23(b)(3)" as well as the new claim for money damages.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Shawnee Library System
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 173 , 94 S.Ct. 2140, 2150 , 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974); Gert v. Elgin Nat’l Indus., Inc., 773 F.2d 154, 159-60 (7th Cir.1985); see also Williams v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 832 F.2d 100, 103 (7th Cir.1987) (discussing notice requirement), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kristian Luckett, AKA Kenneth Clark
This argument is foreclosed by United States v. Cannizzaro, 871 F.2d 809, 810 (9th Cir.) ("Congress intended those convicted of violating both Sec. 924(c) and Sec. 2113(d) to receive cumulative sentences."), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 895 (1989); see also United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760, 766 (9th Cir.1987) (imposition of consecutive sentences for violations of Secs. 2113 and 924(c) does not implicate double jeopardy clause), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. National Football League
See, e.g., Williams v. Burlington *1412 Northern, Inc., 832 F.2d 100, 104 (7th Cir. 1987) (even though plaintiff did not have right to opt out, court “provided [plaintiff] with the equivalent due process protection that would be accorded to a Rule (23)(b)(3) class member”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988); cf. Robertson, 556 F.2d at 685-86 (discussing due process rights of mandatory class members prior to Shutts).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bobby Ray Mosley
See Russell, 411 U.S. at 435 , 93 S.Ct. at 1644 (noting danger of “giv[ing] the federal judiciary a ‘chancellor’s foot’ veto over law enforcement practices of which it did not approve”); see also United States v. Esch, 832 F.2d 531, 539 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 908 , 108 S.Ct. 1084 , 99 L.Ed.2d 242 and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1299 , 99 L.Ed.2d 509 (1988). *911 The stringent nature of the test is demonstrated by the fact that although the defense has been raised many times, in only a small handful of those eases has the government’s conduct actually bee…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvatore T. \Sam\" Busacca"
See, e.g., United States v. Esch, 832 F.2d 531, 541-42 (10th Cir.1987) (each pornographic photograph of a child amounted to a separate violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (a) even though several of the photos were taken at the same session), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 908 , 108 S.Ct. 1084 , 99 L.Ed.2d 242 cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1299 , 99 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981); United States v. Fermin-Castillo, 829 F.2d 1194, 1199 (1st Cir.1987) (“each use of the wires constitutes a separate crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 , even if the several uses are in pursuance of but one single criminal enterprise”)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Military Circle Pet Center No. 94, Inc. v. Cobb County
Compare Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 F.2d 468, 474 (3d Cir.1987) (extending Crawford), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 , 108 S.Ct. 1298 , 99 L.Ed.2d 508 (1988); ECOS, Inc. v. Brinegar, 671 F.Supp. 381 , 404 n. 12 (M.D.N.C.1987) (same) with Sapanajin v. Gunter, 857 F.2d 463, 465 (8th Cir.1988) (refusing to extend Crawford); Hillburn v. Commissioner, 683 F.Supp. 23, 27 (D.Conn.1987) (same), aff'd, 847 F.2d 835 (2d Cir.1988); United States v. Yonkers Board of Education, 118 F.R.D. 326, 330 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Browne
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-6530.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1988.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.