green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…this constitutional threshold must be met before any consideration of the typicality of claims or commonality of issues required for procedural reasons by fed.r.civ.p. 23.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lott v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co.
in light of falcon, general statistical evidence of underrepresentation in the workforce will undoubtedly not suffice to justify a single class covering different types of discrimination such as in hiring, promotion, and discharge.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ben Jones, John Issac Harvey Echols Jim Thornton Sherman Jones Henry Washington, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Inc., Ben Jones, John Issac Harvey Echols Jim Thornton Sherman Jones Henry Washington, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.
this constitutional threshold must be met before any consideration of the typicality of claims or commonality of issues required for procedural reasons by fed.r.civ.p. 23.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jones v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
this constitutional threshold must be met before any consideration of the typicality of claims or commonality of issues required for procedural reasons by fed.r.civ.p. 23.
examined
Cited "see"
E Z Sockets, Inc. v. Brighton-Best Socket Screw Mfg., Inc.
(3×)
See Business Electronics v. Sharp Electronics, 485 U.S. 717, 735-36 , 108 S.Ct. 1515, 1525-26 , 99 L.Ed.2d 808, 823-25 , cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1727 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrews v. AT&T
See Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476, 1482 (11th Cir.1987) ("Only after the court determines the issues for which the named plaintiffs have standing should it address the question whether [they] have representative capacity, as defined by Rule 23(a)...."), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988). 21 We review the district court's grant of class certification for an abuse of discretion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrews v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476, 1482 (11th Cir.1987) (“Only after the court determines the issues for which the named plaintiffs have standing should it address the question whether [they] have representative capacity, as defined by Rule 23(a)....”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Raul Rivera-Gomez
See United States v. Lau, 828 F.2d 871, 874 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chorney
See United States v. Lau, 647 F.Supp. 33, 34 (D.P.R.1986), aff'd, 828 F.2d 871 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Worrall ex rel. Worrall v. Irwin
See Moore, 890 F.2d at 836 (Well-ford, J. concurring) (citing McCabe’s Furniture, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co., 798 F.2d 323, 328 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988)); Hampton v. Hanrahan, 600 F.2d 600, 621 (7th Cir.1979), rev’d, in part, on other grounds, 446 U.S. 754 , 100 S.Ct. 1987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
CATANZANO BY CATANZANO v. Dowling
See Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988) (named plaintiff must have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Catanzano ex rel. Catanzano v. Dowling
See Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988) (named plaintiff must. have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schiffer
See United States v. Sokolov, 814 F.2d 864, 871 (2d Cir.1987) (Government failed to carry its burden where there was no evidence as to the citizen’s actual interview or evidence that examiners were required to and always did ask particular questions.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988); Osidach, 513 F.Supp. at 105 (“[TJhere is no clear evidence on the present record that Osidach was personally asked that question [about World War II service] by [the examiner] during his 1963 interview, or even that the question was routinely asked of all applicants as a …
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988); Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc., 463 F.2d 495, 499 (7th Cir.1972); Dallas Gay Alliance, Inc. v. Dallas County Hosp.
discussed
Cited "see"
TV Communications Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc.
(2×)
See Westman Comm’n Co. v. Hobart Int’l, Inc., 796 F.2d 1216 , 1224 n. 1 (10th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); Anesthesia Advantage, 759 F.Supp. 638 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. Metz Group
(2×)
See Westman Comm’n Co. v. Hobart Int’l, Inc., 796 F.2d 1216, 1220 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); Christofferson Dairy v. MMM Sales, 849 F.2d 1168 , 1172 (9th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Trustees of Nat. Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund v. Zengel Bros., Inc.
See Garment Dist., Inc. v. Belk Stores Serv., Inc., 799 F.2d 905, 906 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc.
See Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476, 1483-84 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988); Chrisner v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc., 645 F.2d 1251, 1258 (6th Cir.1981); Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., 565 F.2d 895, 898-99 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 835 , 99 S.Ct. 118 , 58 L.Ed.2d 131 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bi-Rite Oil Company, Inc. v. Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc.
(2×)
See Westman Commission Co. v. Hobart International, Inc., 796 F.2d 1216, 1223-24 (10th Cir.1986), certiorari denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 , which adopted the rule later followed in Business Electronics 3 Plaintiff has abandoned its charge that defendants attempted to monopolize the relevant market
discussed
Cited "see"
Bi-Rite Oil Co. v. Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n
(2×)
See Westman Commission Co. v. Hobart International, Inc., 796 F.2d 1216, 1223-24 (10th Cir.1986), certiorari denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 , which adopted the rule later followed in Business Electronics . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter L. Reazin, M.D. Hca Health Services of Kansas, Inc., D/B/A Wesley Medical Center Health Care Plus, Inc. And New Century Life Insurance Co. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., and Counterclaim and Hmo Kansas, Inc., Additional Counterclaim v. Hospital Corporation of America, Additional Counterclaim
(2×)
See Westman Comm'n Co. v. Hobart Int'l, Inc., 796 F.2d 1216, 1220 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); Christofferson Dairy v. MMM Sales, 849 F.2d 1168 , 1172 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
(2×)
See Westman Comm’n Co. v. Hobart Int’l, Inc., 796 F.2d 1216, 1220 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); Christofferson Dairy v. MMM Sales, 849 F.2d 1168 , 1172 (9th Cir.1988).
examined
Cited "see"
Jay Palmer v. Brg of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, D/B/A Bar/bri
(4×)
See Business Electronics Corporation v. Sharp Electronics Corp., 485 U.S. 717 , 108 S.Ct. 1515, 1519 , 99 L.Ed.2d 808 cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1727 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jeffries
(2×)
See United States v. Schmuck, 840 F.2d 384, 387 (7th Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1727 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); see also United States v. Rein, 848 F.2d 777, 783 (7th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Discon, Incorporated v. Nynex Corporation, Nynex Material Enterprises, New York Telephone Company, Robert J. Eckenrode, and Bernard O'Reilly
(2×)
See Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc., 710 F.2d 752, 776-78 (11th Cir.1983); see also Westman Commission Co. v. Hobart International, Inc., 796 F.2d 1216 , 1224 n. 1 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1728 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Sherrill Wilkerson
See, e.g., United States v. Lau, 828 F.2d 871, 875 (1st Cir.1987) (court relies on fact that one defendant had license to fly the plane in question, another was nearby the site where the transaction occurred, and the witness used the defendants’ correct names when first describing them to the authorities, to support the reliability of the witness’ identification of the defendants), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988); United States v. DiTommaso, 817 F.2d 201 , 214 n. 17 (2d Cir.1987) (even if the identification was unreliable, error was harmless where evid…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilkerson
See, e.g., United States v Lau, 828 F.2d 871, 875 (1st Cir. 1987) (court relies on fact that one defendant had license _________________________________________________________________ 2 The trial judge instructed counsel that inconsistent statements went to the probative value of the testimony and should be discredited by counsel through cross-examination. 5 to fly the plane in question, another was nearby the site where the transaction occurred, and the witness used the defendants' correct names when first describing them to the authorities, to support the reliability of the witness' identif…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forehand v. Florida State Hospital at Chattahoochee
Instead, the Court stressed that a Title VII class action should be certified only “if the trial court is satisfied, after a rigorous analysis, that the prerequisites of Rule 23(a) have been satisfied.” Falcon, 457 U.S. at 161 , 102 S.Ct. at 2372 ; see also, Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis Ordean Reese v. Thomas A. Fulcomer
See, e.g., United States v. Lau, 828 F.2d 871, 975 (1st Cir.1987) (reliability strengthened when one defendant was placed near the scene of the crime), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988); Foley, Investigation and Police Practices: Identifications, 77 Geo.L.J. 626, 634-35 & n. 612 (1989) (reviewing United States Courts of Appeals cases introducing other types of evidence). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John J. Maguire, United States v. Thomas M. Kavanagh, United States v. Robert A. Hickey
See, e.g., United States v. Lau, 828 F.2d 871, 875 (1st Cir.1987) (accepting identification evidence with minimal physical detail and small miscalculations in height estimates), ce rt. denied, 486 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 1729 , 100 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Feddiman v. State
(2×)
See also, Tompkins v. State, 727 S.W.2d 585 , (Tex.Crim.App. 1987), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1727 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); State v. Lewis, 293 S.C. 107 , 359 S.E.2d 66, 68 (1987); United States v. Woods, 812 F.2d 1483, 1487 (4th Cir.1987). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard S. Oldfield
(2×)
See also, United States v. Schmuck, 840 F.2d 384, 385-86 (7th Cir.) (en bane), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1727 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); United States v. Locklear, 829 F.2d 1314 (4th Cir.1987) (per curiam); United States v. Fallon, 776 F.2d 727 (7th Cir.1985); United States v. Lindsey, 736 F.2d 433 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Galloway, 664 F.2d 161 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1981); United States v. Shryock, 537 F.2d 207 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1100 , 97 S.Ct. 1123 , 51 L.Ed.2d 549 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. Young
(2×)
See also, e.g., Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., 780 F.2d 1212, 1219-20 (5th Cir.1986) (corporate documents admitted under state of mind exception to show defendant officer’s belief in their contents), aff’d, 108 S.Ct. 1515 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1727 , 100 L.Ed.2d 192 (1988); United States v. Southland Corp., 760 F.2d 1366, 1376 (2d Cir.) (notes of internal corporate investigation admitted as nonhearsay or under state of mind exception to show general counsel’s perception of nature of "legal fees” in tax fraud case), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 825 , 10…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sharp Electronics Corp.
v.
Business Electronics Corp.
v.
Business Electronics Corp.
No. 85-2094.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2) · D. South Carolina (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.