green
Positive treatment
8.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrews v. Com.
The standard to be applied by the circuit court in determining whether to retain a member of the venire on the jury panel is whether her answers during voir dire examination indicate to the court something that "would prevent or substantially impair the performance of [her] duties as a juror in accordance with [the court's] instructions and [the juror's] oath." Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980); accord Turner v. Commonwealth, 234 Va. 543, 549 , 364 S.E.2d 483, 486 , cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Amrine v. Roper
(2×)
See State v. Amrine, 741 S.W.2d 665 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988); Amrine v. State, 785 S.W.2d 531 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 227 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990); Amrine v. Bowersox, 128 F.3d 1222 (8th Cir. banc 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1123 , 118 S.Ct. 1807 , 140 L.Ed.2d 946 (1998); Amrine v. Bowersox, 238 F.3d 1023 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 372 , 151 L.Ed.2d 283 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Owens v. State
See State v. Porterfield, 746 S.W.2d 441 (Tenn.), reh’g denied, (1988), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1766 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rhodes
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 72 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988) (holding evidence of deliberation sufficient when defendant had several opportunities to abandon his plan to kill the victim).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brooks
See State v. Amrine, 741 S.W.2d 665, 672 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Woodall v. State
See Nelson v. State , 511 So.2d 225 , 238 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd 511 So.2d 248 (Ala. 1987), cert. denied , 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 Ed.2d 217.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coleman
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 66 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988)(strikmg of venire-persons because she had relatives incarcerated in the penitentiary was not racially motivated). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Richardson
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 58-59 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lambert
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 62-63 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); see also State v. Griffin, 848 S.W.2d 464, 468-69 (Mo. banc 1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seabury Management, Incorporated v. Professional Golfers' Association of America, Incorporated Middle Atlantic Section of Professional Golfers' Association of America, Incorporated, and Dick Smith Philadelphia Section of Professional Golfers' Association, Incorporated, Seabury Management, Incorporated v. Professional Golfers' Association of America, Incorporated Middle Atlantic Section of Professional Golfers' Association of America, Incorporated, and Dick Smith Philadelphia Section of Professional Golfers' Association, Incorporated
See Metrix Warehouse, Inc. v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, 828 F.2d 1033 , 1044 n. 21 (4th Cir.1987) (approving use of comparability method for calculating damages in antitrust case, but explaining that there must be "reasonable comparability between the business or markets in question"), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988); Home Placement Serv., Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 819 F.2d 1199, 1205-08 (1st Cir.1987) (explaining that in an antitrust suit the businesses being compared must be comparable for purposes of calculating damages and stating that comparing a Rhode Island business with…
discussed
Cited "see"
Deck v. State
See Owen v. State, 560 So.2d 207 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 855 , 111 S.Ct. 152 , 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990) and Long v. State, 517 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1754 , 100 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Arnett v. Lewis
See United States v. Fouche (Fouche II), 833 F.2d 1284, 1288 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988). 82.
cited
Cited "see"
Parham v. State
See State v. Porterfield, 746 S.W.2d 441, 446 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988); State v. Baker, 751 S.W.2d 154, 162 (Tenn.Crim.App.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Seabury Management, Inc. v. Professional Golfers' Ass'n of America, Inc.
See Metrix Warehouse, Inc. v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, 828 F.2d 1033 , 1044 n. 21 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1753 , 100 L.Ed.2d 215 (1988). 19 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Boone
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 71 (Mo. bane 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Honomichl v. Leapley
(2×)
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 63 (Mo.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); Jones v. Jones, 938 F.2d 838, 844 (8th Cir.1991); United States v. Jimmie Wilson, 884 F.2d 1121, 1124 (8th Cir.1989). [5] In one of the cited cases, it is unclear whether an objection was made at trial, though in light of the fact that the prosecutor there explained his use of the challenge, it is reasonable to assume that objections were raised which brought forth the explanation. [6] Honomichl cites this court to United States v. Horsley, 864 F.2d 1543 (11th Cir.1989), wh…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McCain
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 62-63 [12] (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); State v. Tramble, 813 S.W.2d 83, 85 [5] (Mo.App.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Beal
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); State v. Griffin, 818 S.W.2d 278 (Mo. banc 1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Long v. State
See Long v. State, 517 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1754 , 100 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Satcher v. Commonwealth
(2×)
The standard to be applied by the trial court in determining whether to retain a venireman on the jury panel is whether his answers during voir dire examination indicate to the court something that “would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.” Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 (1980); accord Turner v. Commonwealth, 234 Va. 543, 549 , 364 S.E.2d 483, 486 , cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988); O’Dell, 234 Va. at 695, 364 S.E.2d at 504.
cited
Cited "see"
Moten v. Commonwealth
See Turner v. Commonwealth, 234 Va. 543, 548 , 364 S.E.2d 483, 486 , cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Blodgett
See DeShields v. State, 534 A.2d 630, 639 (Del.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1754 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Blodgett
See DeShields v. State, 534 A.2d 630, 639 (Del.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1754 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Huff v. State
Accord, Ex parte Branch , 526 So.2d at 624 . ' "In a Batson context, the Supreme Court observed that because the trial judge's findings 'largely will turn on evaluation of credibility, a reviewing court ordinarily should give those findings great deference.' Batson , 476 U.S. at 98 , n. 21 [ 106 S.Ct. at 1724 , n. 21]." ' Owens v. State , 531 So.2d 22 , 23 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), quoting State v. Antwine , 743 S.W.2d 51 , 66 (Mo. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 62-63 [12] (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); State v. Tramble, 813 S.W.2d 83, 85 [5] (Mo.App.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dukes
See State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 62-63 [12] (Mo.banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); State v. Tramble, 813 S.W.2d 83, 85 [5] (Mo.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moss v. City of Montgomery
Accord, Ex parte Branch , 526 So.2d [609] at 624 [(Ala. 1987)]. ' "In a Batson context, the Supreme Court observed that because the trial judge's findings 'largely will turn on evaluation of credibility, a reviewing court ordinarily should give those findings great deference.' Batson , 476 U.S. at 98 , n. 21 [ 106 S.Ct. at 1724 n. 21]." ' Owens v. State , 531 So.2d 22 , 23 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988), quoting State v. Antwine , 743 S.W.2d 51 , 66 (Mo. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988). 'In reviewing the lower court's ruling, we [are] mindful that it is not o…
discussed
Cited "see"
Trimed, Inc. v. Sherwood Medical Co.
See Metrix Warehouse v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, 828 F.2d 1033 , 1042-45 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1753 , 100 L.Ed.2d 215 (1988); Allegheny Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Mid-Atlantic Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 690 F.2d 411, 415 (4th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mitchell
See State v. Amrine, 741 S.W.2d 665, 671 [11] (Mo.banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Langlois
See State v. Brown, 514 So.2d 99 (La.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1754 , 100 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eaton v. Commonwealth
(2×)
The standard to be applied by the trial court in determining whether to retain a venireman on the jury panel is whether his answers during voir dire examination indicate to the court something that "would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath." Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521, 2526 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980); accord Turner v. Commonwealth, 234 Va. 543, 549 , 364 S.E.2d 483, 486 , cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988); O'Dell, 234 Va. at 695, 364 S.E.2d at 504. 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mathis
See United States v. Fouche, 833 F.2d 1284 (9th Cir.1987) cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988), regarding an agent’s ability to question a suspect after an equivocal (or ambiguous) request for counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Owen v. State
See Long v. State, 517 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1754 , 100 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988), and cases cited therein; and Martin, where although there was no violation of the fifth amendment by continuing questioning after an equivocal invocation of Miranda rights, the court held that the continued questioning was reversible error under Miranda .
discussed
Cited "see"
Warner v. State
Accord, Ex parte Branch , 526 So.2d at 624 . " 'In a Batson context, the Supreme Court observed that because the trial judge's findings "largely will turn on evaluation of credibility, a reviewing court ordinarily should give those findings great deference." Batson , 476 U.S. at 98 , n. 21[, 106 S.Ct. at 1724 , n. 21].' " Owens v. State , 531 So.2d 22 , 23 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), quoting State v. Antwine , 743 S.W.2d 51 , 66 (Mo. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Palmer
See United States v. Fouche, 833 F.2d 1284 (9th Cir.1987) cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988), regarding an agent’s ability to question a suspect after an equivocal (or ambiguous) request for counsel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lashawn Lowell Banks
(2×)
Miranda, 384 U.S. at 474 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; see also United States v. Fouche, 833 F.2d 1284, 1287 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Evans
L.REV. 511, 605 (1994). [31] See, e.g., State v. Hawkins, 72 Wash.2d 565, 568-69 , 434 P.2d 584 (1967) (holding that trial court has inherent power to hear an untimely motion or order a new trial sua sponte); State v. Johnston, 84 Wash.2d 572, 577 , 527 P.2d 1310 (1974) (holding that trial court may sua sponte conduct a formal evidentiary hearing regarding the defendant's competency to go to trial). [32] 669 N.E.2d 1372 (Ind.1996), cert. denied by Williams v. Indiana, 520 U.S. 1232 , 117 S.Ct. 1828 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1997). [33] Williams, 669 N.E.2d at 1379 . [34] 650 N.E.2d 1198 (Ind.App. 5 …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Evans
Williams, 669 N.E.2d at 1382 (emphasis added); see also Currin v. State, 669 N.E.2d 976, 979-80 (Ind. 1996). 743 S.W.2d 51, 64 (Mo. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frazier v. State
See also Woodall v. State, 730 So.2d 652 (Ala.Cr.App. 1997), aff'd in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 730 So.2d 652 (Ala. 1998) (quoting Nelson v. State, 511 So.2d 225 , 238 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd, 511 So.2d 248 (Ala. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988)) ("`[m]ere allegations by counsel that the accused is incompetent to stand trial or was insane at the time of the commission of the offense do not establish reasonable grounds to doubt a defendant's sanity which would warrant an inquiry into his competency.'") Accordingly, due to the lack of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
See, e.g., State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 66 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988)(holding that striking of venireperson because a relative or friend is serving or has served time in jail is a legitimate non-racial reason for striking venire-person); State v. Tomlin, 864 S.W.2d 364, 367 (Mo.App.1993) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Dell v. Netherland
(2×)
O'Bryan v. McKaskle, 465 U. S. 1013 (1984); King v. Lynaugh, 850 F. 2d 1055, 1057 (CA5 1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 1019 (1989); Peterson v. Murray, 904 F. 2d 882, 886-887 (CA4), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 992 (1990); Knox v. Collins, 928 F. 2d 657, 660, 662 (CA5 1991); see also Turner v. Commonwealth, 234 Va. 543, 551-552 , 364 S. E. 2d 483, 487-488 , cert. denied, 486 U. S. 1017 (1988); Mueller v. Commonwealth, 244 Va. 386, 408-409 , 422 S. E. 2d 380, 394 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U. S. 1043 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paws With a Cause, Inc. v. Donna J. Crumpler, and Robo Dogs, Inc. William R. Jackson Virginia Canines for Independence William I. Sydnor
See, e.g., Metrix Warehouse v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, 828 F.2d 1033 , 1044 n. 21 (4th Cir.1987) (approving use of comparability method for calculating damages in antitrust case, but explaining that there must be reasonable comparability between the business and markets in question), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988). 38 Also, while the district court deducted five percent for expenses, there is no explanation of how the district court arrived at this figure, and Virginia courts repeatedly have disapproved of damages for lost profits if expenses are not proved and deducted, see, e.g.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paws With A Cause v. Crumpler
See, e.g., Metrix Warehouse v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, 828 F.2d 1033 , 1044 n.21 (4th Cir. 1987) (approv- ing use of comparability method for calculating damages in antitrust case, but explaining that there must be reasonable comparability between the business and markets in question), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cameron
See Also State v. Porterfield, 746 S.W.2d 441, 446 (Tenn.1988), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1756 , 100 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marizu Jite Ogbuehi, AKA Morris Ogbuehi, AKA Mariczu Jite Ogbuehi, United States of America v. Payton Eugene Teague, AKA Eugene P. Teague
"If the desire is not clearly expressed, then further questioning must be limited to clarifying the defendant's intention." Id.; see also United States v. Fouche, 833 F.2d 1284, 1287 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988) (Fouche II ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ogbuehi
“If the desire is not clearly expressed, then further questioning must be limited to clarifying the defendant’s intention.” Id.; see also United States v. Fouche, 833 F.2d 1284, 1287 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988) (Fouche II).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Simmons
See, e.g., State v. Ant wine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 62-63 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); see also State v. Ottwell, 852 S.W.2d 370, 373 (Mo.App.E.D.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. O'BRIEN
See, e.g., State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 72 (Mo. banc 1987) (inference of premeditation supported by the fact that defendant bypassed four separate opportunities to abandon his plan to kill second victim and by fact that defendant, finding himself manacled in police custody, still managed to kill the second victim by stomping him to death), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 , 108 S.Ct. 1755 , 100 L.Ed.2d 217 (1988); State v. Grubbs, 724 S.W.2d 494, 498 (Mo. banc) (facts that victim was bound hand and foot, that he had thirteen broken ribs and that his throat was cut supported an inference of prem…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allan Fuentes Sosa, United States of America v. Jaime Espinoza Leon, Aka: Jamie Leon Espinoza, United States of America v. Miguel Ortiz Pedraza
Id.; see also United States v. Fouche, 776 F.2d 1398, 1403 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1017 (1988). 23 Viewing the whole picture of the present case, it is clear that specific, articulable facts gave rise to a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.
v.
Metrix Warehouse, Inc.
v.
Metrix Warehouse, Inc.
No. 87-1560.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1988.
486 U.S. 1017
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of Automobile Importers of America et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.