green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.5 score
“defendant is not entitled to a severance simply because the evidence against a codefendant is far more damaging than the evidence against him.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Phillipe Dell Fargo v. City of San Juan Bautista
But see Stevens v. Corbell, 832 F.2d 884 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2018 , 100 L.Ed.2d 604 (1988), where the Fifth Circuit seems to have established a more rigorous standard.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gulf War Veterans Health Statutes
to be sure, congress is generally free to change its mind; in amending legislation congress is not bound by the intent of an earlier body.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Earnest Seale, Jr., AKA E.J. (89-4098), William McCrady (90-3007), Lester Ware, AKA Larry Lester (90-3008), Crystal Woodard (90-3014), Edward Sylvester Gray (90-3209), William McCrady (90-3211), Michael Jerome Davis (90-3215) and Thomas A. Walker, AKA Tony Walker
defendant is not entitled to a severance simply because the evidence against a codefendant is far more damaging than the evidence against him.
discussed
Cited "see"
Olson v. Fajardo-Velez
(2×)
See United States v. López Andino, 831 F.2d 1164, 1167-1168 (1st cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2018 , 100 L.Ed.2d 605 (1988) (allowing federal conviction to stand, de *43 spite prior state conviction arising from same criminal conduct); see also United States v. Lara, 541 U.S. 193, 204 , 124 S.Ct. 1628 , 158 L.Ed.2d 420 (2004) (noting that sovereignty of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a United States territory, is the result of Congressional delegation).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1281 (6th Cir.1987) ("Plain errors are limited to those harmful ones that are so rank that they should have been apparent to the trial judge without objection, or that strike at the fundamental fairness, honesty, or public reputation of the trial."), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1281 (6th Cir.1987) (“Plain errors are limited to those harmful ones that are so rank that they should have been apparent to the trial judge without objection, or that strike at the fundamental fairness, honesty, or public reputation of the trial.”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. Allen Randy McClain
See United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1286 (6th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Moss (92-1132) Ronald Kohn (92-1136) Joann Climpson (92-1144) and Randy Richardson (92-1155)
(2×)
See United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1281 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988). 26 Generally, the attorney-client privilege extends to "(c)onfidential disclosures by a client to an attorney made in order to obtain legal assistance." Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc., 975 F.2d 81, 94 (3d Cir.1992) (quoting Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 , 96 S.Ct. 1569, 1577 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Karl Hofstatter (92-1836) and Michael Griffor (92-1805)
See United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1284 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Andrew Paul Taylor v. United States
See United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1283 (6th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elmer S. Edwards
See United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1285 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 (1988). 45 Applying the precedent here, it is clear that Edwards is correct in his first argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Elizondo, Juan Carlos Colin, Valdemar Colin, Alejandro Rodriguez and Fernando Rodriguez
Pro. 12.1 advisory committee’s note; see United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1283 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988) (good cause for government non-disclosure of alibi rebuttal witness existed where notice was provided within 48 hours of time government learned of witness’s potential testimony and within 24 hours of government’s decision to call her, and physical safety and protection of potential witness justified earlier non-disclosure).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walker, Ex Parte Calvin Gary
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez Andino, 831 F. 2d 1164, 1168 (CA1 1987) (accepting the Government’s position that “Puerto Rico is to be treated as a state for purposes of the double jeopardy clause”), cert. denied, 486 U. S. 1034 (1988).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle
(3×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez Andino, 831 F. 2d 1164, 1168 (CA1 1987) (accepting the Government’s position that “Puerto Rico is to be treated as a state for purposes of the double jeopardy clause”), cert. denied, 486 U. S. 1034 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
The cases cited by Reed on this point are not to the contrary and simply reinforce the rule “that the determination of whether statements are in fact inconsistent is committed to the sound discretion of the district court.” United States v. Agajanian, 852 F.2d 56, 58 (2d Cir.1988); see also United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1282 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ghanim Hermis
See United States v. Grosshans, 821 F.2d 1247, 1253 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 987 (1987); see also United States v. Chalkias, 971 F.2d 1206, 1212 (6th Cir.) (citing United States v. Meyers, 952 F.2d 914, 917 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1695 (1992)), cert. denied, 61 U.S.L.W. 3285 (U.S.1992). 16 Plain errors are those that are "so rank that they should have been apparent to the trial judge without objection, or that strike at the fundamental fairness, honesty, or public reputation of the trial." United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1281 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sheppard
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez Andino (1st Cir. 1987), 831 F.2d 1164 , cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2018 , 100 L.Ed.2d 605 (1988); United States v. Vincent (5th Cir. 1981), 648 F.2d 1046 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence Moore
The test established in Biggers by which to determine whether the identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive asks "whether under the 'totality of the circumstances' the identification was reliable even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive." Id. at 199; see also United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1286 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lee Smith (No. 90-4041), Donald Dozier (No. 90-4062) A/K/A Darrell Thomas
Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 93 S.Ct. 375, 382 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). 52 Hamilton, 684 F.2d at 383 ; see also United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1285 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 (1988). 53 The district court applied the proper standard and found that Gilliam's in-court identification was reliable and independent of the photo array.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. William Cargo, Cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1287 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 (1988) (adopting without citing the Byrd test as one element in determining whether a severance should be granted when defendant intends to use testimony of co-defendants).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hammon v. Barry
(2×)
Instead of allowing the Hammon plaintiffs to willy-nilly deprive this Court of jurisdiction, “thus bringing [these] proceedings to a standstill while a non-appealable ruling wends its way through the appellate process,” Venen v. Sweet, 758 F.2d 117, 121 (3d Cir.1985), the Court will “disregard the notice of appeal [from a non-appealable order] and proceed with the case,” Hammerman v. Peacock, 623 F.Supp. 719, 721 (D.D.C.1985) (citing 9 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 203.11, at 3-52 (citing cases)); see also SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, Inc., 829 F.2d 341 , 344 (2d Cir.1987), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simpson v. Hines
See, e.g., Stevens v. Corbett, 832 F.2d 884 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1033 , 108 S.Ct. 2018 , 100 L.Ed.2d 604 (1988) (ar-restee in custody); McFadden v. Lucas, 713 F.2d 143 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 998 , 104 S.Ct. 499 , 78 L.Ed.2d 691 (1983) (convicted prisoner).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howard v. Vandiver
Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 816 n. 26, 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 2737 n. 26, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 , 409 n. 26 (1982); see also Stevens v. Corbett, 832 F.2d 884 (5th Cir.1987), reh’g denied, 838 F.2d 1214 , cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1033 , 108 S.Ct. 2018 , 100 L.Ed.2d 604 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harry Duprey, Juan Bolivar and Cesar A. Bolivar
“Juries are not so susceptible that they cannot measure intelligently the weight of identification testimony that has some questionable feature.” Manson, 432 U.S. at 116 , 97 S.Ct. at 2254 ; see also United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1277, 1285 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1034 , 108 S.Ct. 2019 , 100 L.Ed.2d 606 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Creel
v.
Pfeiffer
v.
Pfeiffer
No. 87-6235.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · Office of Legal Counsel (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.