green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Lulac East Park Place Trust v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
(3×)
It could be argued that Bowen impliedly supports this position that contract actions seeking equitable relief may be heard in district eourt/magistrate court under the APA. 487 U.S. at 895, 108 S.Ct. 2722 ; docket no. 39 at 2-3.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Srivastava
See United States v. Whitehorn, *403 813 F.2d 646 , 649 n. 4 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 931 (“the premise of the inevitable discovery doctrine is that the illegal search played no real part in discovery of incriminating evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc.
See In re Agent Orange Product Litigation, 611 F.Supp. 1223, 1249 (E.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 818 F.2d 187 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied sub nom., Lombardi v. Dow Chemical Co., 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988); Thomas v. FAG Bearings, 846 F.Supp. 1382, 1394 (W.D.Mo.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trustees of the Local Union No. 17 Sheet Metal Workers' Apprenticeship Fund v. May Engineering Co.
See Robbins v. Iowa Road Builders Co., 828 F.2d 1348, 1354-55 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 1240, 108 S.Ct. 2899 , 2914, 101 L.Ed.2d 933, 945 (1988); Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds v. Waiola Carpenter Shop, Inc., 823 F.2d 289, 297-98 (9th Cir.1987) (discussing contrasts between the two claims). 11 In light of these differences, the Court cannot conclude that the two causes of action are analogous for purposes of adopting a limitations period.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rutigliano v. Valley Business Forms
See DeLuca by DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958 (3d Cir.1990) (testimony must be able to support a jury finding both (i) that the drug can produce birth defects and (ii) that the drug more likely than not caused the birth defects in this particular case), on remand 791 F.Supp. 1042 (D.N.J.1992), aff'd, 6 F.3d 778 (3d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044, 114 S.Ct. 691 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); see In re Agent Orange Product Liability Lit., 611 F.Supp. 1223, 1250 (E.D.N.Y.1985) (to prove specific causation, plaintiffs expert must first prove general causation and …
discussed
Cited "see"
Maiorana v. United States Mineral Products Co.
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 611 F.Supp. 1223, 1261-62 (E.D.N.Y. 1985) (“Agent Orange II”), aff'd, 818 F.2d 187 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation.
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 611 F.Supp. 1223, 1261-62 (E.D.N.Y.1985) ("Agent Orange II "), aff'd, 818 F.2d 187 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Findley v. Falise
Waldron v. Raymark Indus., 124 F.R.D. 235 , 238 n. 1 (N.D.Ga.1989); see In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litig., 818 F.2d 179, 182 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988) (approving a 23(b)(1)(B) class “as a method of establishing criteria for distributing a class settlement fund,” and observing that “‘the allocation of an inadequate fund among competing complainants is a traditional equitable function.’ ” (quoting Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Helfand, 687 F.2d 171, 174 (7th Cir.1982))).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litigation
Waldron v. Raymark Indus., 124 F.R.D. 235 , 238 n. 1 (N.D.Ga.1989); see In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litig., 818 F.2d 179, 182 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988) (approving a 23(b)(1)(B) class "as a method of establishing criteria for distributing a class settlement fund," and observing that "`the allocation of an inadequate fund among competing complainants is a traditional equitable function.'" (quoting Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Helfand, 687 F.2d 171, 174 (7th Cir.1982))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wade-Greaux Ex Rel. Greaux v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc.
See DeLuca by DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 911 F.2d 941 , 958 (3d Cir. 1990) (testimony must be able to support a jury finding both (i) that the drug can cause birth defects and (ii) that the drug more likely than not caused the birth defects in this particular case), on remand to 791 F. Supp. 1042 (D.N.J. 1992), aff'd, 6 F.3d 778 (3d Cir. 1993); see In re Agent Orange Product Liability Lit., 611 F. Supp. 1223, 1250 (E.D.N.Y. 1985) (to prove specific causation, plaintiff's expert witnesses must first prove general causation and then exclude other possible causes for the plainti…
cited
Cited "see"
Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh
See Amoco Production Co. v. Hodel, 815 F.2d 352, 359 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh
See Amoco Production Co. v. Hodel, 815 F.2d 352, 359 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Diamond Shamrock Chemicals v. Aetna
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 818 F. 2d 187, 193 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed. 2d 932 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litig., 611 F.Supp. 1223, 1248-1250, 1261-1263 (D.C.N.Y.1985), aff' d, 818 F.2d 187 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Connors v. Paybra Mining Co.
See, e.g., Robbins v. Iowa Road Builders Co., 828 F.2d 1348, 1353 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 1240, 108 S.Ct. 2899 , 2914, 101 L.Ed.2d 933, 945 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oken v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Whitehorn, 813 F.2d 646, 649-50 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 931 (1988) (inevitable discovery doctrine applied to evidence discovered during illegal bomb sweep of apartment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert W. Oakley
“The information remaining in the affidavit after excluding the observations by the detectives during their allegedly illegal search of the boat clearly provided the state court judge with the ‘substantial basis’ necessary to conclude that probable cause existed to issue the search warrant.” Johnston, 876 F.2d at 592 ; see also United States v. Whitehorn, 813 F.2d 646, 649 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 931 (1988); United States v. Vasey, 834 F.2d 782, 788-89 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Auburn Police Union v. Tierney
See, e.g., State v. Events Int'l, Inc., 528 A.2d 458, 461 (Me.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2899 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988) (citing Munson, 104 S.Ct. at 2852 & n. 13; Schaumburg, 444 U.S. at 637-39 , 100 S.Ct. at 836-37 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Joint Eastern and Southern District New York Asbestos Litigation. Elvira Grispo as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Grispo Deceased and Elvira Grispo Individually v. Eagle--Picher Industries, Inc., Dominick Fusco v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Charles Patrick Hynes v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Hyman Stone and Gussie Stone v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
See Nicholson v. United Technologies Corp., 697 F.Supp. 598, 603 (D.Conn.1988); see also In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 187 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988). 1 60 Also capable of rejection on the present state of the record is the contention by plaintiffs that the injurious asbestos-based cement was a "stock" item similar to the hypothetical "stock" helicopter referred to in Boyle as not subject to the contractor defense.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grispo v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
See Nicholson v. United Technologies Corp., 697 F.Supp. 598, 603 (D.Conn.1988); see also In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 187 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 , 108 S.Ct. 2898 , 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988). 1 Also capable of rejection on the present state of the record is the contention by plaintiffs that the injurious asbestos-based cement was a “stock” item similar to the hypothetical “stock” helicopter referred to in Boyle as not subject to the contractor defense.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Van Orsow
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-6712.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 30, 1988.
487 U.S. 1234
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.