green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
“summary judgments should seldom be used in cases alleging employment discrimination because of the special category in which congress and the supreme court visualized these cases”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bass v. City of Wilson
summary judgments should seldom be used in cases alleging employment discrimination because of the special category in which congress and the supreme court visualized these cases
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 795 (Fed.Cir.1988) (“We must, therefore, reject appellants’ contention that the agency’s regulations formed an integral part of the Smithsons’ contract with FmHA and that violation of any of those regulations can serve as a proper basis for the complainants’ claims of breach of contract.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fry v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (claims based on unauthorized acts (wrongdoing) by the [Government officials sound in tort); see also 28 U.S.C. 1491(a) (“the United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction upon any claim ... in eases not sounding in tort.” (emphasis added)).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCormick v. City of Lawrence
See United States v. Henson, 848 F.2d 1874 , 1383-84 (6th Cir.1988) (finding that the inadvertent seizure of documents not relevant to the proceeding did not violate defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989); Whitten, 706 F.2d at 1013 (affirming a district court opinion finding no Fourth Amendment violation where officers, after completely rewinding an answering machine tape, inadvertently heard messages other than those they were otherwise entitled to hear). 1996 WL 67907 , at *4.
cited
Cited "see"
Wildman v. Burke Marketing Corp.
Ctr., 128 F.3d 1201, 1205 (8th Cir.1997)); see Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 364 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. State
(2×)
These courts have unanimously held that "impeachment by pri- or inconsistent statement may not be permitted where employed as a mere subterfuge to get before the jury evidence not otherwise admissible.” Whitehurst v. Wright, 592 F.2d 834, 839 (5th Cir.1979) (quoting United States v. Morlang, 531 F.2d 183, 190 (4th Cir.1975)); United States v. Johnson, 802 F.2d 1459, 1466 (D.C.Cir.1986); Accord United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1479 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); United States v. Frappier, 807 F.2d 257, 259 (1st Cir.1986), cert. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunrise Village Mobile Home Park, L.C. v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dureiko v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific National Cellular v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Petition of Bruce Craig for Order Directing Release of Grand Jury Minutes. Bruce Craig v. United States
See 488 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989).) 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Englert v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beno v. United Telephone Co. of Florida
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas case).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCauley v. States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Tolerson v. Auburn Steel Co., Inc.
See id. (citing Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 364-65 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.
See Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., 827 F.2d 363 , 367-68 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); see also Bashara v. Black Hills Corp., 26 F.3d 820, 823 (8th Cir.1994). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Osario v. Harza Engineering Co.
See In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago, 848 F.2d 1151 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, Azar v. Minister of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago, 488 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989) (Court of Appeals explains the history of § 1782).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Leased Housing Ass'n v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (quoting Eastport S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Washington International Insurance v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791 (Fed.Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alphonso Pedraza, United States of America v. Peter Brent Irelan, United States of America v. Enrique Pedraza
See United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1481 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1994
Co., 778 F.2d 512, 515 (8th Cir.1985); see generally Walker v. AT & T Technologies, 995 F.2d 846 (8th Cir.1993). 56 Although we have sometimes found that an employer's "reduction in force" may have been a ruse to mask intentional age discrimination, see, e.g., Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 (8th Cir.1987), 14 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989), Gaworski's own testimony shows that is not the case here.
cited
Cited "see"
Lee KOPP, Appellant, v. SAMARITAN HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., and Saadi Albaghdadi, Appellees
See Hillebrand v. M-Tron Industries, Inc., 827 F.2d 363, 365 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fisher v. Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (comments not direct evidence of discrimination where plaintiff inferred discriminatory intent from the comment).
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. Fairfax County School Board
See Perry, 738 F.Supp. at 851 (citing Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
ca11 1993
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 831 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc.
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 831 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
William F. GLOVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP., Defendant-Appellant
See Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 367 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (quoting Christie v. Foremost Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davies v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Florida, Inc.
Carter, 870 F.2d at 581 ; see, Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (11th Cir.1988); Buckley v. Hospital Corp. of America, Inc., 758 F.2d 1525, 1529-30 (11th Cir.1985); Bell v. Birmingham Linen Service, 715 F.2d 1552, 1557 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Animal Protection Institute of America v. Mosbacher
See Kokechik Fishermen’s Assoc. v. Secretary of Commerce, 839 F.2d 795, 801 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 775 (1989). 8 *179 There are two grounds upon which petitioners challenge the permits in both cases.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Carter
The government may not introduce evidence of prior statements “ ‘under the guise of impeachment for the primary purpose of placing before the jury substantive evidence which is not otherwise admissible.’ ” United States v. Miller, 664 F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir.1981) (emphasis in original); see United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1479 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Application of Asta Medica, SA
See In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago, 848 F.2d 1151, 1156 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989) ("While a district court generally should not decide whether the requested evidence will be admissible in the foreign court, ... the district court must decide whether the evidence would be discoverable in the foreign country before granting assistance”); accord, Lo Ka Chun v. Lo To, 858 F.2d 1564, 1566 (11th Cir.1988); In re Court of the Comm’r of Patents for the Republic of South Africa, 88 F.R.D.…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Shanta Morgan
See United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1480 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Horace Perkins, Jr. v. Dareld Kerby, Warden
See Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794, 799-800 (1989) (citing Wasman v. United States, 468 U.S. 559, 569 (1984)). 7 Cases subsequent to Pearce have held that where the sentence being challenged was meted out by a different sentencing authority, the presumption does not generally apply, because the ultimate sentencing authority "will have no personal stake in the prior conviction and no motivation to engage in self-vindication." Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, 412 U.S. 17, 27 (1973); see United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1482 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen
See Bhaya v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 832 F.2d 258 , 260 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989), citing Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.1983). 5.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Michael Wach
See United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1483 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas American Bancshares, Inc. v. Clarke
See National Ass’n of Counties v. Baker, 842 F.2d 369, 373 (D.C.Cir.1988). cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 775 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry D. Chalmers
See United States v. Henson, 848 F.2d 1374, 1382 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 784 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dallmann
See United States v. Henson, 848 F.2d 1374, 1383 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989); United States v. Ellison, 793 F.2d 942, 948 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 937 , 107 S.Ct. 415 , 93 L.Ed.2d 366 (1986); Milliman v. Minnesota, 774 F.2d 247, 250 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Trugilo, supra, 731 F.2d at 1128 . “[W]hether a warrant fails the particularity requirement cannot be decided in a vacuum.” Milliman v. Minnesota, supra, 774 F.2d at 250 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Letter of Request From the Crown Prosecution Service of the United Kingdom, Thomas J. Ward
See In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad & Tobago, 848 F.2d 1151, 1155 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989); Young v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. 87 Civ. 8307 (JFK), slip op. at 14-16, 1988 WL 131302 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United States
Christopher Assocs., 511 F.3d at 1384 ; see also Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nielson v. Thompson
See also Danbury Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Delaney, 207 Conn. 743 , 542 A.2d 1153, 1156 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 775 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Blanco-Rodriguez
Compare Austin, 786 F.2d at 991 (finding plain error where prosecution repeatedly referred to codefendant’s guilty plea during opening and closing), with United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1481 (10th Cir. 1988) (concluding there was no plain error where witness’ prior conviction was mentioned only during examination of witness), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 -11- (1989), and Davis, 766 F.2d at 1455-57 (finding no plain error where defendant used guilty pleas to own advantage and government’s reference to pleas was limited to credibility issues).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armindo v. Padlocker, Inc.
See McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-05 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824-1826 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); see also Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (distinguishing between a “direct evidence” and a McDonnell Douglas case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta
An issue of material fact is not genuine if the issue is unsupported by the evidence, or if the issue is created by evidence that is “merely color-able” or “not significantly probative.” Id. at 250 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511; see also Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Hudson v. Southern Ductile Casting Corp., 849 F.2d 1372, 1376 (11th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca7 1995
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners Ass'n v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225, 232 (7th Cir.1975) (NEPA "does not require that a specific class of experts be consulted"), certiorari denied, 424 U.S. 967 ; see also Illinois Commerce Comm'n v. ICC, 848 F.2d 1246 , 1257-1260 (D.C.Cir.1988), certiorari denied, 488 U.S. 1004 (1988); Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation v. ICC, 841 F.2d 479 , 484 (2d Cir.1988). 4 Moreover, there is no evidence in this case that the ICC neglected to perform an environmental analysis of the proposed abandonments--in fact, ICC staff clearly did consider the potential environmen…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bummer v. Collier
See also Danbury Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Delaney, 207 Conn. 743 , 542 A.2d 1153, 1156 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 775 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holmes v. Marriott Corp.
See, e.g., Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825 (11th Cir.1988) (statements that plaintiff lacked the “wherewithal” to perform his job, “moved in slow motion,” and was “proactive” on the job held to be not evidence of age discrimination), cert. denied 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); *707 Shostak v. United States Postal Serv., 662 F.Supp. 158, 161-62 (D.Me.1987) (comment that plaintiff was “too old for job” was not proof of age discrimination where comment was made when plaintiff was struggling with heavy mail bags, sweating and looking tired.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotarski v. Binks Manufacturing Co.
See also Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indust., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 366 n. 6 (8th Cir.1987) (citing cases and stating elimination of requirement as black letter rule), cert. de nied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In The Matter Of The Application Of Malev Hungarian Airlines, Plaintiff
See, e.g., In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs, 117 F.R.D. 177, 178 (S.D.Fla.1987), aff'd, 848 F.2d 1151 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989); In re Letter of Request for Judicial Assistance, 669 F.Supp. 403, 408 (S.D.Fla.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malev Hungarian Airlines v. United Technologies International Inc.
See, e.g., In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs, 117 F.R.D. 177, 178 (S.D.Fla. 1987), aff’d, 848 F.2d 1151 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct. 784 , 102 L.Ed.2d 776 (1989); In re Letter of Request for Judicial Assistance, 669 F.Supp. 403, 408 (S.D.Fla.1987).
In re Solerwitz
No. 88-502.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. North Carolina (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.