green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Ernie Lee Blackwell v. United States
See United States v. Paul, 853 F.2d 308, 311 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Randolph Lancaster
See United States v. Anderson, 851 F.2d 384, 393-94 (D.C.Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 792 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orestes Luciano Abreu, United States of America v. James David Thornbrugh
(2×)
See United States v. Steven W., 850 F.2d 648, 649 (10th Cir.1988) (citing Lott v. United States, 367 U.S. 421, 426 , 81 S.Ct. 1563, 1566-67 , 6 L.Ed.2d 940 (1961) (“the plea itself does not constitute a conviction”)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 791 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio M. Smart
See also United States v. Anderson, 851 F.2d 384, 393 (D.C.Cir.1988) (‘‘[Tlhere is often an inherent danger with expert testimony unduly biasing the jury ‘because of its aura of special reliability and trust.’ ") (quoting United States v. Amaral, 488 F.2d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir.1973)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 792 (1989). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Duran
See also United States v. Anderson, 851 F.2d 384, 390 (D.C.Cir.1988) (technical defects under Rule 41 do not call for exclusion of the evidence produced by the search), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 792 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez
See, e.g., United States v. Fox, 845 F.2d 152 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 800 , 102 L.Ed.2d 791 (1989) and United States v. Perceval, 803 F.2d 601 (10th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bobby Russell
Id. at 990-91, 104 S.Ct. at 3429; see also United States v. Anderson, 851 F.2d 384, 388-89 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 792 (1989) (discussing Sheppard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carrye E. Maxwell
See, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 851 F.2d 384, 387-89 (D.C.Cir.1988) (agents reasonably relied on warrant as being limited by affidavit where warrant was defective because affidavit was not incorporated into it), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 792 (1989); see also United States v. Curry, 911 F.2d at 78 ; United States v. Luk, 859 F.2d 667 (9th Cir.1988). 7 B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tourlakis v. Morris
See also United States v. Anderson, 851 F.2d 384, 393 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 792 (1989); United States v. Amaral, 488 F.2d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Doe
See also United States v. Anderson, 271 U.S.App.D.C. 129, 138 , 851 F.2d 384, 393 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 801 , 102 L.Ed.2d 792 (1989) (upholding admission of expert testimony regarding pimp-prostitute relationships); United States v. Khan, supra note 19 , 787 F.2d at 34 (“operations of narcotics dealers' are a proper subject for expert testimony under Fed.R.Evid. 702” and “more than satisf[y] the minimal relevancy standards of Fed.R.Evid. 401”); United States v. Daly, 842 F.2d 1380, 1388 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821 , 109 S.Ct. 66 , 102 L.Ed.2d 43 (198…
Sink
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-5442.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.