green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. Town of Farmington
See Huntington Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Town of Huntington, 844 F.2d 926, 935 (2d Cir.1988), aff'd on other grounds, 488 U.S. 15 , 109 S.Ct. 276 , 102 L.Ed.2d 180 (1988), reh’g denied, 488 U.S. 1023 , 109 S.Ct. 824 , 102 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
San Pedro Hotel Co., Inc., a California Corporation John Fentis, as Trustee for the Fentis Family Marital Trust B John M. Fentis, an Individual Pearle Fentis, an Individual Maria C. Fentis, an Individual John Fentis, as Trustee for the Fentis Family Survivor's Trust v. City of Los Angeles, a California Municipal Corporation Rudy Svorinich, Jr., an Individual, San Pedro Hotel Co., Inc., a California Corporation John Fentis, as Trustee for the Fentis Family Marital Trust B as Trustee for the Fentis Family Survivor's Trust, and as an Individual: Pearle Fentis Maria C. Fentis v. City of Los Angeles
See Huntington Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Town of Huntington, 844 F.2d 926 (2d Cir.1988) (holding that town violated Act by rejecting proposal to construct subsidized housing in primarily white neighborhood when its proffered reasons were unconvincing), review denied in part and judgment affirmed, 488 U.S. 15 , 109 S.Ct. 276 , 102 L.Ed.2d 180 (1988), rehearing denied, 488 U.S. 1023 , 109 S.Ct. 824 , 102 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles
See Huntington Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Town of Huntington, 844 F.2d 926 (2d Cir.1988) (holding that town violated Act by rejecting proposal to construct subsidized housing in primarily white neighborhood when its proffered reasons were unconvincing), review denied in part and judgment affirmed, 488 U.S. 15 , 109 S.Ct. 276 , 102 L.Ed.2d 180 (1988), rehearing denied, 488 U.S. 1023 , 109 S.Ct. 824 , 102 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Cole v. State
See Cole v. State, 525 So.2d 365 (Miss. 1987), cert. denied 488 U.S. 934 , 109 S.Ct. 330 , 102 L.Ed.2d 348 (1988), reh'g. denied 488 U.S. 1023 , 109 S.Ct. 826 , 102 L.Ed.2d 815 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Cole v. State
See Cole v. State, 525 So.2d 365 (Miss.1987), cert. denied 488 U.S. 934 , 109 S.Ct. 330 , 102 L.Ed.2d 348 (1988), reh’g. denied 488 U.S. 1023 , 109 S.Ct. 826 , 102 L.Ed.2d 815 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
W. Hartford Interfaith v. Town Council, No. Cv91-0501205s (Aug. 26, 1992)
See generally, Huntington Branch NAACP v. Town of Huntington, 844 F.2d 926 , 939 (2nd Cir. 1988), aff'd 488 U.S. 15 , reh. den. 488 U.S. 1023 (1988), discussed in TCR, supra, section II.C.6.a. c.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Turner v. State
See also Cole v. State, 525 So.2d 365, 369 (Miss.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 934 , 109 S.Ct. 330 , 102 L.Ed.2d 348 (1988), reh'g denied, 488 U.S. 1023 , 109 S.Ct. 826 , 102 L.Ed.2d 815 (1989); Cummings v. State, 465 So.2d 993, 996 (Miss.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evans v. State
See also Cole v. State, 525 So.2d 365, 369 (Miss.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 934 , 109 S.Ct. 330 , 102 L.Ed.2d 348 (1988), reh'g denied, 488 U.S. 1023 , 109 S.Ct. 826 , 102 L.Ed.2d 815 (1989); Cummings v. State, 465 So.2d 993, 996 (Miss.1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Edwin Hart Turner v. State of Mississippi
See also Cole v. State, 525 So. 2d 365, 369 (Miss. 1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 934 (1988), reh'g denied, 488 U.S. 1023 (1989); Cummings v. State, 465 So. 2d 993, 996 (Miss. 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Kimberlin, 527 F.Supp. 1010 (S.D.Ind.1981) (where juror notes disposed of prior to deliberations, no prejudice shown), aff'd, 805 F.2d 210 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987); White v. State, 552 P.2d 1161 (Okla.Crim.App.1976) (no prejudice where juror notes not used in jury deliberations); Bakhit v. Thomsen, 193 Neb. 133 , 225 N.W.2d 860 (1975) (although note-taking generally frowned upon, no prejudice where no showing that notes used in jury room); State v. Emrick, 129 Vt. 475 , 282 A.2d 821 (1971) (note-taking not …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald Leroy Evans v. State of Mississippi
See also Cole v. State, 525 So. 2d 365, 369 (Miss.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 934 (1988), reh'g denied, 488 U.S. 1023 (1989); Cummings v. State, 465 So. 2d 993, 996 (Miss.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Winslow et ux.
v.
Williams Town of Huntington, New York v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Chaires v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Miner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services Wohlford et ux. v. United States Department of Agriculture Martin v. Morris Shostak v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Shanks v. Estes Park Bank Broad et ux. v. Conway Neville v. Mollen, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department Turner v. United States Postal Service Patillo v. Georgia In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Ikeni v. California Superior Court of Fresno County Cole v. Mississippi Thompson v. Southeastern Toyota Distributors, Inc. May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Campbell v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force Fleming v. Deak Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego Bigg v. Office of Personnel Management Martin v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc. Drabick v. Drabick Rowe v. Department of the Army Rowe v. Department of the Army Martin v. Zook
v.
Williams Town of Huntington, New York v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Chaires v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Miner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services Wohlford et ux. v. United States Department of Agriculture Martin v. Morris Shostak v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Shanks v. Estes Park Bank Broad et ux. v. Conway Neville v. Mollen, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department Turner v. United States Postal Service Patillo v. Georgia In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Ikeni v. California Superior Court of Fresno County Cole v. Mississippi Thompson v. Southeastern Toyota Distributors, Inc. May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Campbell v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force Fleming v. Deak Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego Bigg v. Office of Personnel Management Martin v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc. Drabick v. Drabick Rowe v. Department of the Army Rowe v. Department of the Army Martin v. Zook
No. 87-1921; No. 87-1961; No. 87-2128; No. 87-6947; No. 87-7189; No. 87-7284; No. 88-296; No. 88-418; No. 88-445; No. 88-474; No. 88-5252; No. 88-5347; No. 88-5400; No. 88-5439; No. 88-5446; No. 88-5451; No. 88-5452; No. 88-5461; No. 88-5462; No. 88-5497; No. 88-5507; No. 88-5511; No. 88-5549; No. 88-5592; No. 88-5642; No. 88-5643; No. 88-5677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
488 U.S. 1023
Published
[*1023] ante, p. 820;
ante, p. 15;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 927;
ante, p. 927;
ante, p. 943;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 920;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 931;
ante, p. 931;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 932;
[*1024] No. 88-5549. No. 88-5592. No. 88-5642. No. 88-5643. No. 88-5677.ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 958;
ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 951; and
ante, p. 972. Petitions for rehearing denied.