green
Positive treatment
published
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Austin v. Town of Farmington, 113 F. Supp. 3d 650 (W.D.N.Y. 2015).published
- San Pedro Hotel Co., Inc., a California Corp. John Fentis, as Tr. for the Fentis Fam. Marital Trust B John M. Fentis, an Individual Pearle Fentis, an Individual Maria C. Fentis, an Individual John Fentis, as Tr. for the Fentis Fam. Survivor's Trust v. City of Los Angeles, a California Mun. Corp. Rudy Svorinich, Jr., an Individual, San Pedro Hotel Co., Inc., a California Corp. John Fentis, as Tr. for the Fentis Fam. Marital Trust B as Tr. for the Fentis Fam. Survivor's Trust, & as an Individual: Pearle Fentis Maria C. Fentis v. City of Los Angeles, 159 F.3d 470 (9th Cir. 1998).published
- San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 159 F.3d 470 (9th Cir. 1998).published
- Cole v. State, 608 So. 2d 1331 (Miss. 1992).published
- Cole v. State, 608 So. 2d 1313 (Miss. 1992).published
- W. Hartford Interfaith v. Town Council, 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 1085 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992).unpublished
- Turner v. State, 732 So. 2d 937 (Miss. 1999).published
- Evans v. State, 725 So. 2d 613 (Miss. 1997).published
- Edwin Hart Turner v. State of Mississippi, No. 97-DP-00583-SCT (Miss. Feb. 15, 1997).published
- Johnson v. State, 887 S.W.2d 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).published
Show 1 more citing case
- Donald Leroy Evans v. State of Mississippi, No. 93-DP-01173-SCT (Miss. Sept. 18, 1993).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Winslow et ux.
v.
Williams Town of Huntington, New York v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Chaires v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Miner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services Wohlford et ux. v. United States Department of Agriculture Martin v. Morris Shostak v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Shanks v. Estes Park Bank Broad et ux. v. Conway Neville v. Mollen, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department Turner v. United States Postal Service Patillo v. Georgia In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Ikeni v. California Superior Court of Fresno County Cole v. Mississippi Thompson v. Southeastern Toyota Distributors, Inc. May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Campbell v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force Fleming v. Deak Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego Bigg v. Office of Personnel Management Martin v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc. Drabick v. Drabick Rowe v. Department of the Army Rowe v. Department of the Army Martin v. Zook
v.
Williams Town of Huntington, New York v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Chaires v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Miner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services Wohlford et ux. v. United States Department of Agriculture Martin v. Morris Shostak v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Shanks v. Estes Park Bank Broad et ux. v. Conway Neville v. Mollen, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department Turner v. United States Postal Service Patillo v. Georgia In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Ikeni v. California Superior Court of Fresno County Cole v. Mississippi Thompson v. Southeastern Toyota Distributors, Inc. May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Campbell v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force Fleming v. Deak Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego Bigg v. Office of Personnel Management Martin v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc. Drabick v. Drabick Rowe v. Department of the Army Rowe v. Department of the Army Martin v. Zook
No. 87-1921; No. 87-1961; No. 87-2128; No. 87-6947; No. 87-7189; No. 87-7284; No. 88-296; No. 88-418; No. 88-445; No. 88-474; No. 88-5252; No. 88-5347; No. 88-5400; No. 88-5439; No. 88-5446; No. 88-5451; No. 88-5452; No. 88-5461; No. 88-5462; No. 88-5497; No. 88-5507; No. 88-5511; No. 88-5549; No. 88-5592; No. 88-5642; No. 88-5643; No. 88-5677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Published opinion
488 U.S. 1023
Published
[*1023] ante, p. 820;
ante, p. 15;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 927;
ante, p. 927;
ante, p. 943;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 920;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 931;
ante, p. 931;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 932;
[*1024] No. 88-5549. No. 88-5592. No. 88-5642. No. 88-5643. No. 88-5677.ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 958;
ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 951; and
ante, p. 972. Petitions for rehearing denied.