green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Smith
the burden is on the defendant to demonstrate financial inability in order to obtain counsel.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rudolph v. Cuomo
the equal protection clause does not ... 'require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as thought they were the same
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kourosh Bakhtiari
here the evidence would be insufficient to warrant a jury charge on the defense excluded at trial ...
cited
Cited "see"
Christian v. State
Accord Ricks v. State, 312 Md. 11, 26 , 537 A.2d 612 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988); State v. Savage, 170 Md.App. 149, 175 , 906 A.2d 1054 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ragland v. State
See Ricks v. State, 312 Md. 11, 31-32 , 537 A.2d 612, 621-22 , cert, denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988) (permitting police detective to identify individuals on surveillance tape as defendants); 5 Scott v. John H.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradfield
See Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d at 315-16 (citations omitted)(emphasis added). 35 United States v. Rizk, 833 F.2d 523, 525 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S. Ct. 90 (1988)(citing Cervantes- Pacheco, 826 F.2d at 315-16 ). 36 Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d at 316 (emphasis added). 37 Hoffa, 385 U.S. at 311 , 87 S. Ct. at 418 . 20 prerequisite to the admissibility of such testimony.38 As noted, we have set forth with precision the rules that govern the admissibility of the testimony of a compensated witness.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ben Edward Tomlin
See United States v. Fernandez, 839 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) ("It seems obvious defense counsel wished to place [the defendant's] statement to [the officer] before the jury without subjecting [the defendant] to cross-examination, precisely what the hearsay rule forbids."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary F. Epley, Ronald J. Pike, and James Goodman
See United States v. Krzyske, 836 F.2d 1013, 1021 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 89 , 102 L.Ed.2d 65 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ben Edward Tomlin
See United States v. Fernandez, 839 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) ("It seems obvious defense counsel wished to place [the defendant's] statement to [the officer] before the jury without subjecting [the defendant] to cross-examination, precisely what the hearsay rule forbids."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liddy v. Cisneros
A federal agency’s interpretation of its own regulations is “of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation,’ ” Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 85 S.Ct. 792, 801-802 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965) (quoting Bowles v. Seminole Rock Co., 325 U.S. 410 , 413-14, 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 (1945)); see Soler v. G. & U., Inc. 833 F.2d 1104, 1108 (2d Cir.1987) (“Even if a court concludes that its alternative construction of the agency’s regulation is ‘more equitable’ or ‘more reasonable,’ the agency’s interpretation of its regulat…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Nineteen Appeals Arising Out of the San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation
See Neron v. Tierney, 841 F.2d 1197, 1201 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Soler v. G & U, INC.
See Soler v. G & U, Inc., et al., 615 F.Supp. 736 (S.D.N.Y.1985), rev’d, 833 F.2d 1104 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 88 , 102 L.Ed.2d 64 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael Valencia and Luis Arturo Penaflor
See United States v. Rizk, 842 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988); United States v. Rengifo, 789 F.2d 975 (1st Cir.1986). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ott v. State
(2×)
See Ricks v. State, 312 Md. 11, 26 , 537 A.2d 612, 619 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Oakley
See United States v. Thompson, 837 F.2d 673, 675-76 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 89 , 102 L.Ed.2d 65 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Vivion McRae and Paulette McRae v. Seafarers' Welfare Plan
See Bishop v. Osborn Transp., Inc., 838 F.2d 1173, 1174 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Morales v. Pan American Life Insurance Co.
See Bishop v. Osborn Transp., Inc., 838 F.2d 1173, 1174 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Archambault
United States v. Black, 543 F.2d 35, 37 (7th Cir.1976); United States v. Ailemen, 165 F.R.D. 571, 572-601 (N.D.Cal.1996); United States v. Chen, 820 F.Supp. 1205, 1207-12 (N.D.Cal.1992); see also United States v. Krzyske, 857 F.2d 1089, 1090-92 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 89 , 102 L.Ed.2d 65 (1988); Queen, 847 F.2d at 350-51 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. State
See, e.g., Ricks v. State, 312 Md. 11, 31-32 , 537 A.2d 612, 621-22 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Immanuel Okunbor, United States of America v. Osaretin Omobagie
See, e.g., United States v. Alicea, 837 F.2d 103, 106-07 (2d Cir.) (holding that the district court properly refused to instruct the jury on duress where there was no evidence that the defendants had "made any attempt either to seek protection from the authorities ... or to [convey] a warning ... to their relatives when they had an opportunity to do so"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 (1988). 10 United States v. Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 (9th Cir.1984) is not to the contrary.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Larry Turner
See id. (when initial examination of money upon defendant’s arrest on state charges was proper, second search relevant to unrelated federal charges to obtain serial numbers from the bills which had been placed in a sealed envelope in the jail did not require a warrant); United States v. Burnette, 698 F.2d 1038, 1049 (9th Cir.) (“once an item in an individual’s possession has been lawfully seized and searched, subsequent searches of that item, so long as it remains in the legitimate uninterrupted possession of the police, may be conducted without a warrant”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 986 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See also Bishop v. Osborn Transportation, Inc., 838 F.2d 1173, 1174 (11th Cir.) (“The six integrated civil enforcement provisions of section 1132(a) focus heavily on the beneficiary’s right to enforce the terms of the plan.... ”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spalding v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
See, e.g., Bishop v. Osborn Transportation, Inc., 838 F.2d 1173, 1174 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988); Moffitt v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi, 722 F.Supp. 1391, 1394 (N.D.Miss.1989) (punitive and extra-contractual damages disallowed in denial of benefits action); Bova v. American Cyanamid Co., 662 F.Supp. 483, 489 (N.D.Ohio 1987) (collecting cases); Bone v. Association Management Services, Inc., 632 F.Supp. 493, 496 (S.D.Miss.1986); cf. Samos v. Dean Witter Reynolds, 772 F.Supp. 715 , 718 & 720 (D.R.I.1991) (state law negligence claim …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Extradition of Curtis Andrew Howard. United States of America v. Curtis Andrew Howard
(2×)
See, e.g., Neron v. Tierney, 841 F.2d 1197, 1199 (1st Cir.) (admonishing against the use of habeas corpus to superimpose federal procedural choices upon state courts merely because the federal, court thinks some "other” procedure might be "better"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988); United States v. Reveron-Martinez, 836 F.2d 684, 687 (1st Cir.1988) (ruling that pretrial publicity, even though pervasive and negative, did not warrant a presumption of prejudice); United States v. Gullion, 575 F.2d 26, 28 (1st Cir.1978) (explaining that the mere existence of com…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Howard v.
See, e.g., ___ ____ Neron v. Tierney, 841 F.2d 1197, 1199 (1st Cir.) (admonishing _____ _______ against the use of habeas corpus to superimpose federal procedural choices upon state courts merely because the federal court thinks some "other" procedure might be "better"), cert. _____ denied, 488 U.S. 832 (1988); United States v. Reveron-Martinez, ______ ______________ ________________ 836 F.2d 684, 687 (1st Cir. 1988) (ruling that pretrial publicity, even though pervasive and negative, did not warrant a presumption of prejudice); United States v. Gullion, 575 F.2d 26 , _____________ _______ 28 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Howard v.
See, e.g., Neron v. Tierney, 841 F.2d 1197, 1199 (1st Cir.) (admonishing against the use of habeas corpus to superimpose federal procedural choices upon state courts merely because the federal court thinks some "other" procedure might be "better"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 (1988); United States v. Reveron-Martinez, 836 F.2d 684, 687 (1st Cir. 1988) (ruling that pretrial publicity, even though pervasive and negative, did not warrant a presumption of prejudice); United States v. Gullion, 575 F.2d 26, 28 (1st Cir. 1978) (explaining that the mere existence of community prejudice, in and of itsel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charlton Memorial Hospital v. Foxboro Co.
See, e.g., Bishop v. Osborn Transportation, Inc., 838 F.2d 1173, 1174 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 90 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988); Moffitt v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi, 722 F.Supp. 1391, 1394 (N.D.Miss.1989) (punitive and extra-contractual damages disallowed in denial of benefits action); Bova v. American Cyanamid Co., 662 F.Supp. 483, 489 (N.D.Ohio 1987) (collecting cases; plan participant may recover benefits owed in denial of benefits claim under § 1132 but cannot recover extra-contractual compensatory and punitive damages); Bone v. Association Management S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Liberta
v.
Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility
v.
Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility
No. 87-6940.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 832
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.