green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Houlihan
But cf. Johnson v. Chrans, 844 F.2d 482 , 486 n. 4 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 95 , 102 L.Ed.2d 71 (1988) (explaining that in some circumstances the Seventh Circuit has been willing to admit a declarant’s out-of-court statements to prove conduct of another person, despite opposite result under Illinois state law). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tiller
See United States v. Clemons, 658 F.Supp. 1116 (W.D.Pa.1987), aff'd, 843 F.2d 741 (3rd Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence L. Simmons v. Howard L. Beyer and the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, W. Cary Edwards
(2×)
Thus, the majority states: "we cannot evaluate the last two Clemons factors because transcripts of the voir dire are not available...." Majority Op. at 1168; see United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988). 4 56 Thus, as noted, it is clear that Batson's retroactive application to this collateral attack on Simmons's pre-Batson conviction is essential to our mandate requiring New Jersey to grant Simmons a new trial within a reasonable time, to be determined by the district court, or release him.
discussed
Cited "see"
Simmons v. Beyer
Thus, the majority states: "we cannot evaluate the last two Clemons factors because transcripts of the voir dire are not available. . . ." Majority Op. at 14; see United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 (1988).11 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Andre Stanley Deputy v. Stanley Taylor, Warden, Sussex Correctional Institution
See United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741, 747 (3d Cir.) (dicta) (citing United States v. Gordon, 817 F.2d 1538, 1541 (11th Cir.1987), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1265 , 109 S.Ct. 28 , 101 L.Ed.2d 979 (1988)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
Lonnie K. Stephens v. Charles B. Miller, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of Indiana
(6×)
See Cunningham v. Peters, 941 F.2d 535, 538 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1484 , 117 L.Ed.2d 626 (1992) (quoting Johnson v. Chrans, 844 F.2d 482, 484 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 95 , 102 L.Ed.2d 71 (1988)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Belcher
See United States v. Clemons (C.A.3, 1988), 843 F.2d 741, 747 , certiorari denied (1988), 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwards
Accord United-States v. Clemons, 658 F.Supp. 1116, 1119 (W.D.Pa.1987) (“power to grant a new trial should be exercised sparingly and granted only when the evidence preponderates heavily against the verdict”), aff'd, 843 F.2d 741 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Johnson
See United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741, 752-53 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988); United States v. Kalevas, 622 F.Supp. 1523, 1526-27 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald D. Ferguson
(2×)
See United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741, 748 (3d Cir.) (challenge to young, single prospective juror in drug prosecution did not violate Batson ), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988); United States v. McCoy, 848 F.2d 743, 745 (6th Cir.1988) (exclusion upheld of young, unemployed prospective juror); United States v. Harrell, 847 F.2d 138, 139 (4th Cir.) (challenge to unemployed juror upheld), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 944 , 109 S.Ct. 371 , 102 L.Ed.2d 360 (1988). 10 In light of the deference accorded the district court's determinations in jury selection challenges,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People of Michigan v. Gregory M Rice
See also United States v Clemons, 843 F2d 741, 747 (CA 3, 1988), cert den 488 US 835 (1988); United States v Lane, 866 F2d 103, 105 (CA 4, 1989); United States v Battle, 836 F2d 1084, 1086 (CA 8, 1987); United States v Vasquez-Lopez, 22 F3d 900, 902 (CA 9, 1994); United States v David, 803 F2d 1567, 1571 (CA 11, 1986). 10 In Johnson, the United States Supreme Court addressed California’s approach to examining Batson’s first step.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Knight
(2×)
See also United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741, 747 (C.A.3, 1988), cert den 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988); United States v. Lane, 866 F.2d 103, 105 (C.A.4, 1989); United States v. Battle, 836 F.2d 1084, 1086 (C.A.8, 1987); United States v. Vasquez-Lopez, 22 F.3d 900, 902 (C.A.9, 1994); United States v. David, 803 F.2d 1567, 1571 (C.A.11, 1986). [10] In Johnson, the United States Supreme Court addressed California's approach to examining Batson 's first step.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hunter
v.
Campbell
v.
Campbell
No. 87-7060.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 835
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.