green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Silverman v. United Talmudical Academy Torah Vyirah, Inc. (In Re Allou Distributors, Inc.)
See State of N.Y. v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065 , 1084 (2d Cir.) (discussing the rule and identifying the conduct of defendants that helped conceal the fraud), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988); Bobash, Inc. v. Festinger, 57 A.D.3d 464, 467 , 868 N.Y.S.2d 747 (N.Y.App.
cited
Cited "see"
Urban v. Hurley
See, New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065, 1082 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988); Glendora v. Malone, 917 F.Supp. 224, 227 (S.D.N.Y.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Wausau Business Insurance v. Turner Construction Co.
See New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
MMAR Group, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.
See Auster Oil and Gas, Inc. v. Stream, 835 F.2d 597, 603 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 129 , 102 L.Ed.2d 102 (1988); Westbrook v. General Tire and Rubber Co., 754 F.2d 1233, 1241 (5th Cir.1985) (the “better approach is to require a new trial on any issue infected by passion and prejudice, and employ remittitur for those verdicts which are excessive, that is, so large as to be contrary to right reason.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mediators, Inc. v. Manney (In Re the Mediators, Inc.)
See State of New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065, 1083 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988); City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 495 F.2d 448, 460 (2d Cir.1974). 4 *525 A plaintiff “may prove the concealment element by showing either that the defendant took affirmative steps to prevent the plaintiffs discovery of his claim or injury or that the wrong itself was of such a nature as to be self-concealing.” Hendrickson, 840 F.2d at 1088 .
cited
Cited "see"
Supermarket Of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065, 1084 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065, 1084 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moncrief v. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co.
See Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Stream, 835 F.2d 597, 605 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 129 , 102 L.Ed.2d 102 (1988) (general partner in working interest had authority to represent other operators limited partners and non-operating interests in litigation) and Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp., 788 F.Supp. 539, 540 (W.D.Okl.1992) (court concurring with plaintiffs contention that working interest owners are partners or joint venturers).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Eisenhauer v. State, 754 S.W.2d 159, 164 (Tex.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 127 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988), overruled in part by Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681, 690 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. James Neal Blakeman, as of the Estate of C.E. Blakeman, Deceased, Robert Earl Blakeman and Karen A. Whaley, Defendants-Appellees-Cross- and Cross-Appellees, Ridglea Bank v. Maudine Blakeman, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Stream, 764 F.2d 381, 386 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied sub nom., 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 129 , 102 L.Ed.2d 102 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Wool v. Sullivan
See Mall Properties, Inc. v. Marsh, 841 F.2d 440, 441 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 (1988); Dalto v. Richardson, 434 F.2d 1018, 1019 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 979 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blakeman ex rel. Estate of Blakeman
See Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Stream, 764 F.2d 381, 386 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied sub nom., 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 129 , 102 L.Ed.2d 102 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A., in No. 90-3712 v. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments, in No. 90-3790
See Teamsters Local Union No. 430 v. Cement Express, Inc., 841 F.2d 66, 69 (3d Cir.) (“Rule 11 may not be invoked because an attorney, after time for discovery, is unable to withstand a motion for summary judgment."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See New York v. Hendrickson Bros., 840 F.2d 1065, 1084-85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cedar Park Concrete Corp.
Amended Complaints Ml 47-53; see State of New York v. Hendrickson Brothers, Inc., 840 F.2d 1065, 1083 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1989); City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 495 F.2d 448, 461 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marcoux v. Farm Service and Supplies, Inc.
Indeed, as we determine whether the jury’s verdict is supported by the evidence adduced at trial, we are mindful that reasonableness is the touchstone because damages need not be “prove[n] ... with mathematical precision.” Sir Speedy, Inc. v. L & P Graphics, Inc., 957 F.2d 1033, 1038 (2d Cir.1992); see also State of New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065, 1077 (2d Cir.) (“Although the jury is not allowed to base its damages assessment on speculation or guesswork, it is entitled to make a just and reasonable estimate of the damages based on relevant data, and render its verd…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.
At whatever price the buyer sells, the price he pays the seller remains illegally high, and his profits would be greater were his costs lower.” Id., 489; see also New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065, 1079 (2d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S. Ct. 128 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butala v. Agashiwala
See Griffin, 744 F.Supp. at 1256 (citing Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc., 633 F.Supp. 1423, 1443 (S.D.N.Y.1986)); see also Bankers Trust, 859 F.2d at 1105 (applying standard tolling exceptions for civil RICO statute of limitations, citing New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065,1083-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scheiner v. Wallace
(2×)
See also New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F.2d 1065 (2nd Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988) and Lizza Industries, Inc. v. New York, 488 U.S. 848, 109 S.Ct. 128 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (trial court did not err in civil antitrust suit involving conspiracy by contractors and their officers to rig bids on highway contracts by refusing to give mail fraud convictions of four of the co-conspirators preclusive effect; court did not err in allowing State to use judgments only as prima facie evidence that convicted co-conspirators had engaged in collusive sc…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Mandujano v. State
(4×)
Cassias v. State, 719 S.W.2d 585, 587-88 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); see also Eisenhauer v. State, 754 S.W.2d 159, 164 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 848 , 109 S.Ct. 127 , 102 L.Ed.2d 101 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Van Voorhis & Skaggs
v.
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
v.
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
No. 88-4.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 848
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.