green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.0 score
“the legitimacy of the judicial branch ultimately depends on its reputation for impartiality and nonpartisanship.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White
the legitimacy of the judicial branch ultimately depends on its reputation for impartiality and nonpartisanship.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brisbon
See Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 861 , 380, 109 S.Ct. 647, 659 , 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (“the separation of powers into three coordinate Branches is essential to the preservation of liberty.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Keith Daniel Williams v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
See Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d *1484 314, 319 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 158 , 102 L.Ed.2d 129 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerry Brizendine v. William A. Merkle, Warden at California Correction Center
See Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314 , 316 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Dana A. Hall v. Michael Groose
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Stanley E. Boyd v. Paul K. Delo
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lenner Parker v. Larry W. Norris, Acting Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.) (evidentiary hearing unnecessary in Sec. 2254 action where matter may be decided on record), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 4 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. 1 The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas 2 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Wayne Craig v. Michael Groose William L. Webster
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 5 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. 1 The Honorable Edward L.
cited
Cited "see"
Edward C. Hunt v. A.A. Gomez, Warden
See Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael C. Meeks v. Commissioner of Irs Frederick Nielson
See Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314 , 319 n. 5 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (court of appeals has discretion to address issue where review is necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 7 It is fundamental that before summary judgment is granted, the nonmoving party should be provided "a full and fair opportunity to ventilate the issues involved in the motion." Cool Fuel, Inc. v. Connett, 685 F.2d 309, 312 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Narvin J. Bordeaux, Jr.
It is well established that if the defendant had enough time between the *538 provocation and the killing to reflect on his or her intended course of action, “then the mere fact of passion would not reduce the crime below murder.” Collins v. United States, 150 U.S. 62, 65 , 14 S.Ct. 9, 10 , 37 L.Ed. 998 (1893); see Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1073 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronnie Lee Hankins v. Paul K. Delo William Webster
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
John D. O'sullivan, III v. Robert Richards
See Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314 , 319 n. 5 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (court of appeals has discretion to address issue where review is necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice) (citing Bolker v. Commissioner, 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 6 It is fundamental that before summary judgment is granted, the nonmoving party should be provided "a full and fair opportunity to ventilate the issues involved in the motion." Cool Fuel, Inc. v. Connett, 685 F.2d 309, 312 (9th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
John Hamrick v. Superintendent, Farmington Correctional Center
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 4 Accordingly, we affirm.
discussed
Cited "see"
P. Freeman Lazor v. Eddie Ylst, Warden James Rowland, Director
See Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 8 Finally, the district court committed no error in denying the petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 (1963), a decision which the Supreme Court recently overruled.
cited
Cited "see"
Everett B. Robinson v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 6 The judgment is affirmed. 1 The Honorable Stephen M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marion F. Miller, Jr. v. Robert G. Borg
The district court properly determined that Miller is not entitled to relief on this claim because the alleged errors did not "so infect[ ] the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 154 (1977) (quotation omitted); see Prentil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 11 Miller next contends that he was rendered ineffective assistance by his trial counsel, who (1) did not seek pretrial appellate review from the denial of his suppression motion, (2) was not granted continuances for pretrial prepar…
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniel Lopez v. Sam Lewis
Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 154 (1977) (quotation omitted); see Prentil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 6 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Terry L. Myers v. B. J. Bunnell
See Prantil v. State of Cal., 843 F.2d 314, 316 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Samuel E. Haley v. Bill Armontrout
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jessie Smith v. Jimmie Jones, Superintendent
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988) (evidentiary hearing not required where facts not in dispute or dispute can be resolved based on record).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doyle J. Williams v. Bill Armontrout
(2×)
See Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1073-74 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988); Williams, 679 F.Supp. at 928 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole Commission
See Swinson v. United States Parole Comm’n, 682 F.Supp. 29 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 849 F.2d 606 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 158 , 102 L.Ed.2d 129 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Creek v. Weber
See Spillers, 802 F.2d at 1009-10 ; see also Amos v. State of Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 5.Ct. 159, 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milk Industry Foundation v. Glickman
(2×)
See, e.g., Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 861, 372, 109 S.Ct. 647, 654-55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alex Huerta Suniga v. R.J. Bunnell
And we also bear in mind our previous admonition that we “have defined the category of infractions that violate ‘fundamental fairness’ very narrowly.” Id. at -, 112 S.Ct. at 482 (citations and footnote omitted); see also Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 158 , 102 L.Edüd 129 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Sandoval
An “accused,” however (someone who has been either arrested or indicted), is protected from delay not by the Fifth Amendment, but rather by the "more stringent requirements of the Sixth Amendment speedy trial right.” Id. at 1382 ; see also Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 318 (9th Cir.) ("A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is ‘tested by general proscriptions of due process.’ ”) (quoting Arnold, 566 F.2d at 138 ), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 158 , 102 L.Ed.2d 129 (1988). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence L. Shults v. Harol L. Whitley
Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145 (1977); see also Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 317 (9th Cir.) (citing Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 147 (1973)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988). 13 Shults contends that the trial court should also have instructed the jury that Shults's admissions and confessions should be viewed with caution.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry Cox v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Id.; see also Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988) (in habeas cases federal appellate court must presume state court’s findings are correct).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Jenkins v. James Purkett
See, e.g., Amos v. Minnesota, 849 F.2d 1070, 1072 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 159 , 102 L.Ed.2d 130 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hubert A. Roman v. Wayne E. Estelle
See also Prantil v. State of California, 843 F.2d 314 , 316 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 , 109 S.Ct. 158 , 102 L.Ed.2d 129 (1988); Hall v. Sumner, 682 F.2d 786 (9th Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Washington
v.
Lane, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections
v.
Lane, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections
No. 88-5111.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.