green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“money launderers play an essential part in a [§ 846] conspiracy”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Martin A. \Marty\" Sax
money launderers play an essential part in a conspiracy
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Robles
But here the deputy’s actions in foisting the religious tract upon defendant constituted an effort by law enforcement to “interfere[ ] with the free and unhampered decision of [defendant] to testify” (People v Webb, 195 AD2d 614, 615 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 808 [1993]; see United States v Pinto, 850 F2d 927, 932 [2d Cir 1988], certs denied 488 US 867 , 932 [1988]; Andrews v State, 443 So 2d 78, 84 [Fla 1983]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Robles
But here the deputy’s actions in foisting the religious tract upon defendant constituted an effort by law enforcement to “interfere[ ] with the free and unhampered decision of [defendant] to testify” (People v Webb, 195 AD2d 614, 615 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 808 [1993]; see United States v Pinto, 850 F2d 927, 932 [2d Cir 1988], certs denied 488 US 867 , 932 [1988]; Andrews v State, 443 So 2d 78, 84 [Fla 1983]).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morrow
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1414 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edelin
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1414 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hsia
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1414 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Trie
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 *24 F.2d 1384, 1414 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. State
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); see also United States v. Stuart, 718 F.2d 931 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that defendant "opened the door" to prior consistent statement by using portions of that statement on cross-examination).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (“statements made by the defendant” does not include co-conspirator statements, even if those statements can be attributed to the defendant for the purposes of the hearsay rule); United States v. Roberts, 811 F.2d 257 (4th Cir.1987) (plain language of Rule 16(a)(1)(A) pertains to discovery of statements made by defendant, and rule does not mention, nor was it intended to apply to, discovery of statements made by co-conspirators).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
White Indus. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 611 F.Supp. 1049, 1069-70 (W.D.Mo.1985); see United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Vence v. United States, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); Possick, 849 F.2d at 339 ; United States v. Gardner, 611 F.2d 770, 776 (9th Cir.1980); Scales, 594 F.2d at 563-64 ; Smyth, 556 F.2d at 1182-84 ; accord United States v. Goichman, 407 F.Supp. 980, 998 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 547 F.2d 778 (3d Cir.1976); Bader Coal Co. v. Quemahoning Coal Co., 14 F.2d 743, 747 (3d Cir.1926).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Harvey Myerson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 936 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 679 , 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1435 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); see United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1405 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 , 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988). 113 We conclude, however, that the district court applied an overly narrow definition of "new matter." The district court interpreted the standard to preclude recross if the questions fell within an "area" or "subject matter" for which cross-examination had previously been available.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 679 , 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1435 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); see United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1405 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 , 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor M. Rivera and Mario Heredia, AKA \Nacho
Accord United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1418 (D.C.Cir.) (declining to require discovery of coconspirator statement absent Constitutional or statutory authority and citing cases in agreement), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyrone Derr
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1407 (D.C.Cir.) (where defense counsel was given opportunity to, and did, question witness about important aspects of plea bargain, restrictions on questioning as to that source of bias were permissible), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 *1335 L.Ed.2d 83 (1988) (appellant Burns), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (appellant Tarantino); see also United States v. Foster, 982 F.2d 551, 553 (D.C.Cir.1993) (where defense had effectively conveyed inconsistencies in witness’ statements, preclusion of fu…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Williams
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1398 (D.C.Cir.) (trial judge is usually in the best position to evaluate the resulting degree of prejudice, and jury instructions generally are sufficient to minimize any disparities in evidence), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael W. Beauchamp
(4×)
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1409 (D.C.Cir.) (“The ‘specific contradiction’ rule ... is a particular instance of the trial court’s general power under Fed.R.Evid. 403 to exclude evidence ‘if its probative value is substantially outweighed ... by considerations of undue delay, [or] waste of time.’ ”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); Pisan, 636 F.2d at 858 ; 3 Weinstein’s Evidence, 607[5], at 607-79, -80 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lori Ann McGee United States of America v. Peter O'Neal Brown
See United States v. Taranrino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1399-99 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Dean Rhoades
See United States v. Roberts, 747 F.2d 404, 405 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 (1988). 5 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Turkish, 623 F.2d 769, 772-74 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1077 , 101 S.Ct. 856 , 66 L.Ed.2d 800 (1981). 19 The panel's ruling also creates serious problems for the Government in the development of evidence at the grand jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Turkish, 623 F.2d 769, 772-74 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1077 , 101 S.Ct. 856 , 66 L.Ed.2d 800 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrzej Derezinski
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1403-04 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Cusumano
See United States v. Klein, 850 F.2d 404, 405-06 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 173 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Schiff, 801 F.2d 108, 114 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 945 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987); United States v. Uzzolino, 651 F.2d 207 , 210 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 865 , 102 S.Ct. 327 , 70 L.Ed.2d 166 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano Gines
See United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927 , 934 & n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 932, 109 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Beale
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (activities of conspirator unrelated to the aims of the conspiracy not attributable to co-conspirators); United States v. Koopmans, 757 F.2d 901, 905 (7th Cir.1985) (statement by declarant who terminated his involvement in a conspiracy not admissible against a defendant who joined the conspiracy after declarant had left).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Beale
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (activities of conspirator unrelated to the aims of the conspiracy not attributable to co-conspirators); United States v. Koopmans, 757 F.2d 901, 905 (7th Cir.1985) (statement by declarant who terminated his involvement in a conspiracy not admissible against a defendant who joined the conspiracy after declarant had left).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carl Wesley Harbin, United States of America v. Carol Elaine Harbin
“An error is harmless if the reviewing court, after viewing the entire record, determines that no substantial rights of the defendant were affected, and that the error did not influence or had only a very slight influence on the verdict.” United States v. Cortez, 935 F.2d 135, 140 (8th Cir.1991) (quoting United States v. McCrady, 774 F.2d 868, 874 (8th Cir.1985) (citations omitted)), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1062 , 112 S.Ct. 945 , 117 L.Ed.2d 114 (1992); see also United States v. Roberts, 844 F.2d 537, 547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 172 , 102 L.Ed.2d 141 , and 488 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carl Wesley Harbin
“An error is harmless -5- if the reviewing court, after viewing the entire record, determines that no substantial rights of the defendant were affected, and that the error did not influence or had only a very slight influence on the verdict.” United States v. Cortez, 935 F.2d 135, 140 (8th Cir. 1991) (quoting United States v.McCrady, 774 F.2d 868, 874 (8th Cir. 1985) (citations omitted)), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1062 (1992); see also United States v. Roberts, 844 F.2d 537, 547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 983 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Manuel Melendez
See United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 18 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1048 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985); Modica, 663 F.2d at 1179 ; see also United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 936 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hutchison
See e.g., United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1411-3 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988), appeal from rem., 905 F.2d 458 (1990); United States v. Snider, 720 F.2d 985, 992 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1107 , 104 S.Ct. 1613 , 80 L.Ed.2d 142 (1984) ("To be admissible, the statements must somehow advance the objectives of the conspiracy, not merely inform the listener of the declarant's activities.”) .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gray
Hammad, 858 F.2d at 838-39 ; see also United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Lloyd Bruce
See, e.g., United States v. Mason, 902 F.2d 1314, 1316 (8th Cir.1990) (citing United States v. Roberts, 844 F.2d 537, 547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 983, 109 S.Ct. 172 , 534, 102 L.Ed.2d 141, 565 (1988)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert L. Turner, Also Known as Rob, United States of America v. Gilbert L. Dowdy, United States of America v. Steven D. Baker
See, e.g., United States v. Klein, 850 F.2d 404, 406 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 173 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel W. Robinson, Dillard E. Woods, and Paul E. Robinson
See also United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1391 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (holding that a “verdict must be upheld if the evidence adequately supports a finding that a single conspiracy existed.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Allen Malbrough, Appellant/cross-Appellee
United States v. Short, 805 F.2d 335, 336-37 (8th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Klein, 850 F.2d 404, 405 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 173 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lumbar
v.
United States and Goodsky v. United States
v.
United States and Goodsky v. United States
No. 88-5302; No. 88-5324.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 867
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.