green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…such encouragement is inconsistent both with salary payment and executive employment.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…we can review the historical facts only for clear error. whether the district court properly applied these facts to the regulations is a legal question, over which we have plenary review.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
John J. Hilbert, Jr. v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation
(2×)
such encouragement is inconsistent both with salary payment and executive employment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Electric Supply Co., a Corporation, and Richard A. Cooper, Individually v. National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, and National Association of Electrical Distributors, Amicus-Appellants. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Electric Supply Co., a Corporation, and Richard A. Cooper, Individually
we can review the historical facts only for clear error. whether the district court properly applied these facts to the regulations is a legal question, over which we have plenary review.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Martin v. Cooper Electric Supply Co.
we can review the historical facts only for clear error. whether the district court properly applied these facts to the regulations is a legal question, over which we have plenary review.
cited
Cited "see"
SCALIA v. BENE MARKET, LLC
See Brock v. Claridge Hotel and Casino, 846 F.2d 180, 183 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
M.S. v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
See, Lachman v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 852 F.2d 290 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
See Brock v. Claridge Hotel & Casino, 846 F.2d 180, 185-85 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 307 , 102 L.Ed.2d 326 (1988); Abshire v. County of Kern, 908 F.2d 483, 486 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1068 , 111 S.Ct. 785 , 112 L.Ed.2d 848 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnes
See United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 923 (1st Cir.) (noting that society has a “general interest in resolving the guilt or innocence of those accused of *14 crime rapidly (consistent with fundamental fairness) and punishing those found to be guilty”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnes
See United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 923 (1st Cir.) (noting that society has a "general interest in resolving the guilt or innocence of those accused of crime rapidly (consistent with fundamental fairness) and punishing those found to be guilty"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenbush School Committee v. Mr. and Mrs. K
See Lachman v. Illinois State Board of Education, 862 F.2d 290, 297 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988); Brougham by Brougham, 823 F.Supp. at 16 ; Petersen v. Hastings Public Schools, 831 F.Supp. 742, 750 (D.Neb.1993), aff'd, 31 F.3d 705 (8th Cir.1994); Dreher v. Amphitheater Unified School District, 797 F.Supp. 753, 756 (D.Ariz.1992), aff'd, 22 F.3d 228 (9th Cir.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Staula
See United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 924 (1st Cir.), ___ _____________ ________ cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Staula
See United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 924 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.
See United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 924 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Van Dyke
See United States v. Hartness, 845 F.2d 158, 162 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 326 (1988); United States v. Wagoner, 713 F.2d 1371, 1377-78 (8th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Speight, United States of America v. Tyrees C. Whitehead
See United States v. Hartness, 845 F.2d 158, 162 (8th Cir.) (no violation of due process to hand jury indictment during deliberations when jury properly admonished not to consider indictment as evidence), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 (1988). 8 We therefore conclude that any Rule 43 error in giving the jury copies of the instructions during deliberation without allowing Speight or Whitehead to comment or object was harmless.
cited
Cited "see"
Aaron v. City of Wichita, Kan.
Id.; see Brock v. Claridge Hotel and Casino, 846 F.2d 180, 184-85 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 307 , 102 L.Ed.2d 326 (1988); Service Employees Intern.
cited
Cited "see"
Great Frame Up Systems, Inc. v. Jazayeri Enterprises, Inc.
See Nelson v. Mix, 122 Ill.2d 343 , 119 Ill.Dec. 355 , 522 N.E.2d 1214 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 309 , 102 L.Ed.2d 328 (1988); International Surplus Lines Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Nellie Lou Lillie v. United States
See Olitsky v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., 842 F.2d 123, 127 (5th Cir.) (jury verdict reversed), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 307 , 102 L.Ed.2d 326 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Fabio Rodriguez Cortes, United States v. Eduardo Ocampo-Hoyos, United States v. Rafael Perez Martinez
(4×)
See United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 924 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988) (a trial judge abuses his discretion when, in making the determination at issue, he relies on an improper factor); see also Independent Oil & Chem.
cited
Cited "see"
Dole v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
See Brock v. Claridge Hotel and Casino, 846 F.2d 180 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 307 , 102 L.Ed.2d 326 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School Committee
Accord Lachman v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 852 F.2d 290 , 293 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988); Gregory K. v. Longview School Dist., 811 F.2d 1307, 1310 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slama Ex Rel. Slama v. Independent School District No. 2580
No. 94-198, at 12 (1975), reprinted in 1975 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1425, 1436 (1975); see also, Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 311 , 108 S.Ct. 592 , 98 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) (recognizing “the necessity of parental participation in both the development of the IEP and any subsequent assessments of its effectiveness”); see e.g., Brougham v. Town of Yarmouth, 20 IDELR 12 (SEA Me.1993)(finding that, under the IDEA, parental preference alone cannot be the basis for compelling a school district to provide a particular educational plan for a child with disabilities), citing Lachman v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ.,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tucker v. Calloway County Board Of Education
However, this "is by no means an invitation to the courts to substitute their own notions of sound educational policy for those of the school authorities which they review." Rowley, 458 U.S. at 206 , 102 S.Ct. at 3051 . "[O]nce a court determines that the requirements of the Act have been met, questions of [educational] methodology are for resolution by the States." Id. at 208 , 102 S.Ct. at 3052 ; see also Lachman v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 852 F.2d 290 , 297 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988) (parents have no right to compel a specific progra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tucker v. Calloway County Board of Education
However, this “is by no means an invitation to the courts to substitute their own notions of sound educational policy for those of the school authorities which they review.” Rowley, 458 U.S. at 206 , 102 S.Ct. at 3051 . “[O]nce a court determines that the requirements of the Act have been met, questions of [educational] methodology are for resolution by the States.” Id. at 208 , 102 S.Ct. at 3052 ; see also Lachman v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 852 F.2d 290 , 297 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988) (parents have no right to compel a specifi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mavis v. Sobol
Oberti, supra, 995 F.2d at 1214 (and cases cited therein); see also Lachman v. Illinois State Board of Education, 852 F.2d 290, 295 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988). 26 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louis L. Gromo v. United States
In determining whether the facts underlying a claim are "inherently unknowable," the inquiry is whether "plaintiff had sufficient notice to be held legally accountable for asserting any cause of action ... within the period of limitations." La Mear v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 562, 568 , aff'd, 809 F.2d 789 (Fed.Cir.); see also Hohri v. United States, 847 F.2d 779, 783 (Fed.Cir.) (stating that the statute of limitations is not tolled if "[plaintiff is] on notice to inquire that [it] had a potential claim."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rafael Santana and Francis Fuentes
See Osorio, 929 F.2d at 763 (finding no nexus between the alleged misconduct and any prejudice to the defendant); United States v. Pacheco-Ortiz, 889 F.2d 301, 310 (1st Cir.1989) (denying relief when prejudice was not a “product” of alleged misconduct); Babb, 807 F.2d at 272 ; Lieberman, 608 F.2d at 899 ; see also United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 927 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lang
United States v. Gordon, 548 F.2d 743, 744 (8th Cir.1977); see, e.g., United States v. Hartness, 845 F.2d 158, 162-63 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 326 (1988); United States v. Fern, 696 F.2d 1269, 1274 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Grotke, 702 F.2d 49, 54 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. Eisenmann, 396 F.2d 565, 568 (2d Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas (Suisse) S.A. v. Arhens (In re Arhens)
See, e.g., United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 929 (1st Cir.1988) ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 ; Zagano v. Fordham University, 900 F.2d 12 (2nd Cir.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mayon
v.
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
v.
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
No. 88-304.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2) · D.C. Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.