green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas Edward Cordova, Frankie Cordova, Harold Leonard Dominguez
absent a clear abuse of discretion and prejudice, we will not reverse a district court's ruling limiting cross examination of a prosecution witness on the basis that it impermis-si-bly infringed upon the defendant's right of confrontation.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas Cordova
absent a clear abuse of discretion and prejudice, we will not reverse a district court's ruling limiting cross examination of a prosecution witness on the basis that it impermissi-bly infringed upon the defendant's right of confrontation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Provenzano v. Singletary
trial judges retain wide latitude to impose reasonable restrictions on cross-examination to prevent interrogation that is confusing, repetitive, or marginally relevant.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Dickerson, A.K.A. Lane, A.K.A. Frank Dixon
See United States v. Williams, 837 F.2d 1009 , 1013 n. 6 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickerson
See United States v. Williams, 837 F.2d 1009 , 1013 n. 6 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickerson
See United States v. Williams, 837 F.2d 1009 , 1013 n.6 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S. Ct. 490 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tommie Lewis Penson, United States of America v. Genaro Alvarez, United States of America v. Tommie Lewis Penson
See United States v. Campbell, 845 F.2d 782, 785 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Jerico Smith, Also Known as Rico Smith, United States of America v. Harold McMillan United States of America v. Cassell Ali Bobo, Also Known as Louis Taylor, United States of America v. Courtney Bernard Gardner, United States of America v. Donald Cornelius Gardner, United States of America v. Dexter Darron Carr, Also Known as Darron Dexter Carr, Also Known as Dex
The district court's refusal to allow more of the same did not deny defense counsel the opportunity to expose facts from which the jury "could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness." Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 318 , 94 S.Ct. 1105, 1111 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); see United States v. Campbell, 845 F.2d 782, 787-88 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988). 7 "When considering a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, giving it the benefit of all favorable inf…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
The district court’s refusal to allow more of the same did not deny defense counsel the opportunity to expose facts from which the jury “could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness.” Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 318 , 94 S.Ct. 1105, 1111 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); see United States v. Campbell, 845 F.2d 782, 787-88 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McGinnis
See United States v. Vest, 842 F.2d 1319 , 1327 n. 6 (1st Cir.) (“ ‘similarity’ is not a general requirement for admissibility under Rule 404(b)”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital
See Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. United States, 846 F.2d 888 , 892 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988); TVSM, Inc. v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc., 583 F.Supp. 1089, 1092 (E.D.Pa.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel L. Reed
See United States v. Vest, 842 F.2d 1319, 1325 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Reed
See United States v. Vest, 842 F.2d 1319 , 1325 ___ _____________ ____ (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Walls Industries, Inc. v. U.S.
See Eagle–Picher Indus. v. United States, 846 F.2d 888 , 892 & n. 6 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988); In re All Me.
cited
Cited "see"
Walls Industries, Inc. v. United States
See Eagle-Picher Indus. v. United States, 846 F.2d 888 , 892 & n. 6 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988); In re All Me.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry P. Casoni, A/K/A Pete Casoni
See United States v. Vest, 842 F.2d 1319, 1329 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988); cf. United States v. Brantley, 733 F.2d 1429, 1438 (11th Cir.1984) (court need not exclude portions of prior consistent statement “that do not relate specifically to matters on which the defendant has been impeached”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1006 , 105 S.Ct. 1362 , 84 L.Ed.2d 383 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Lake Reserve v. The City of Rocklin the Rocklin Mobile Home Rent Review Commission Carlos Urrutia Rusty Selix Rudolf Michaels George Paras
(2×)
See Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose, 841 F.2d 886, 892 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of Lawrence
See Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of San Jose, 841 F.2d 886, 890 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988); La Salle Nat’l Bank v. Du Page, 777 F.2d 377, 383 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 89-3082
See Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of San Jose, 841 F.2d 886, 890 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988); La Salle Nat'l Bank v. Du Page, 777 F.2d 377, 383 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986). 35 In addition, the Kansas legislature has specifically authorized the city's use of its zoning powers to aid urban renewal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bolen v. Paragon Plastics, Inc.
United States v. Lewis, 902 F.2d 1176, 1179 (5th Cir.1990); Inc. Publishing Corp. v. Manhattan Magazine, 616 F.Supp. 370, 388 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 788 F.2d 3 (2d Cir.1986); see United States v. Vest, 842 F.2d 1319, 1330 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Ozzello v. Peterson Builders, Inc.
See Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States, 846 F.2d 888 , 890 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 490 , 102 L.Ed.2d 527 (1988). 14 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Neal
See, also, U.S. v. Vest, 842 F.2d 1319 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S. Ct. 489 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evans v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Davis, 890 F.2d 1373, 1379 (7th Cir.1989) (citing Mongon, 869 F.2d at 342-43 ), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1092 , 110 S.Ct. 1165 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1068 (1990); United States v. Henderson, 717 F.2d 135 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1009 , 104 S.Ct. 1006 , 79 L.Ed.2d 238 (1984); Stuart, 718 F.2d at 934-35 (9th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Vest, 842 F.2d 1319 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988); United States v. Bowman, 798 F.2d 333 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1043 , 107 S.Ct. 906 , 93 L.Ed.2d 856 (1987); United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bolinske v. North Dakota State Fair Ass'n
(2×)
Forsyth County, Ga. v. Nationalist Movement, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2395 , 120 L.Ed.2d 101 (1992); see also State v. Anderson, 427 N.W.2d 316 (N.D.) (footnote 1), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 491 , 102 L.Ed.2d 528 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Municipal Utilities Bd. Of Albertville v. Alabama Power Company
See Metro Cable Co. v. CATV of Rockford, Inc. 516 F.2d 220, 230 (7th Cir.1975); see also Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of San Jose, 841 F.2d 886, 895 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988) (holding Noerr-Pennington cannot be circumvented merely by alleging that a government official was involved in the alleged conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Municipal Utilities Bd. v. Alabama Power Co.
See Metro Cable Co. v. CATV of Rockford, Inc. 516 F.2d 220, 230 (7th Cir.1975); see also Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of San Jose, 841 F.2d 886, 895 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 965 , 109 S.Ct. 489 , 102 L.Ed.2d 526 (1988) (holding Noerr-Pennington cannot be circumvented merely by alleging that a government official was involved in the alleged conspiracy).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stephens
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-16.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2) · M.D. Florida (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.