green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.8 score
“the district 25 court's previous denial of relief on the merits is not alone 26 sufficient to show that the section 2255 remedy is inadequate”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Myrisia Franklin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
Cabral, 15 F.3d at 196 & n. 6; 7 United States v. Chu Kong Yin, 935 F.2d 990, 1003 (9th Cir.1991) (BIA and reviewing court are limited to the record of conviction and may not look behind the record to the facts of the individual case); Alleyne v. U.S. INS, 879 F.2d 1177, 1185 (3d Cir.1989) (same); but see Kabongo v. INS, 837 F.2d 753, 758 (6th Cir.) (court looked at "facts of the present case, where petitioner has acknowledged his false statements and the statements made to defraud the United States Government," to find that "the convictions may be considered as involving moral turpitude for p…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Myrisia Franklin v. INS
record of conviction" includes "the indictment or information, plea, verdict or judgment and sentence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tony Lomeli Ceja v. Mr. Birkholz
the district 3 court's previous denial of relief on the merits is not alone 4 sufficient to show that the section 2255 remedy is inadequate
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kenneth Floyd Prutting v. Felipe Martinez
the district 25 court's previous denial of relief on the merits is not alone 26 sufficient to show that the section 2255 remedy is inadequate
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wilson v. State Bar of Georgia
We are mindful that “[t]he particular context in which a regulation is promulgated . . . is all important.” Howell v. State Bar of Tex., 843 F.2d 205, 208 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 15 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Rollings v. Washington State
See Tripati v. 24 Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brooks v. Hurwitz
(2×)
“Critically, §2255 is not inadequate or ineffective merely because the petitioner cannot satisfy §2255’s timeliness or other gatekeeping requirements.” Long, 611 F. App’x at 55; see Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d | 1160, 1162 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988): Litterio_v. Parker, 369 F.2d 395, 396 (3d Cir. 1966) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gordon v. United States
(2×)
“Critically, §2255 is not inadequate or ineffective merely because the petitioner cannot satisfy §2255’s timeliness or other gatekeeping requirements.” Long, 611 F. App’x at 55; see Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988): Litterio v. Parker, 369 F.2d 395, 396 (3d Cir. 1966) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Minter
See Howell v. State Bar of Texas, 843 F.2d 205 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 531 , 102 LEd.2d 563 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Corey Maurice Treadwell v. Joel H. Knowles, Warden
See Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Haworth
See United States v. Langella, 804 F.2d 185, 188-89 (2d Cir.1986) (court found no double jeopardy where defendants were convicted of RICO violations and then indicted for additional racketeering acts, because the enterprise and pattern of activity alleged in the two indictments were different), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 532 , 102 L.Ed.2d 564 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Yousef Izat S. Hamdan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Kabongo v. I.N.S., 837 F.2d 753, 756 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988)
cited
Cited "see"
Alan David Harris v. Wayne H. Seifert
See Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.) (§ 2255 motion filed in sentencing court generally is appropriate vehicle for challenging conviction), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael A. Anderson v. Bogan, Warden
See Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988); Johnson v. Petrovsky, 626 F.2d 72, 73 (8th Cir.1980) (per curiam). 6 Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
James Joseph Owens v. Bill R. Story, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Adx, Florence, Colorado
See Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 982 (1988), reh'g denied 488 U.S. 1035 (1989); Arrington v. Willingham, 362 F.2d 803 (10th Cir.1966); McDowell v. Willingham, 354 F.2d 232 (10th Cir.1965). 6 The District Court for the District of Colorado lacked jurisdiction to review the rulings of the sentencing courts and the appellate decisions denying Owens' appeals of those rulings.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Derek Dion Curtis, I
See Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.) (sentencing court denied relief or trial court judge allegedly biased), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988); Madsen v. Hinshaw, 237 F.2d 370, 371 (9th Cir.1956) (district judge refused to rule on Sec. 2255 motion)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger D. Maples
(2×)
See United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 342 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texans Against Censorship v. State Bar of Texas
See Howell v. State Bar of Texas, 843 F.2d 205 , 206 & 208 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 531 , 102 L.Ed.2d 563 (1988) (denying vagueness challenge to state bar rule which prohibited lawyers from “[e]n-gag[ing] in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice,” in part because lawyers “have the benefit of guidance provided by case law, court rules and the lore of the profession”) (internal quotations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orena
See United States v. Langella, 804 F.2d 185, 188-89 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 532 , 102 L.Ed.2d 564 (1988), United States v. Russotti, 717 F.2d 27, 33 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied., 465 U.S. 1022 , 104 S.Ct. 1273 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984), United States v. Salerno, 964 F.2d 172, 175 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.
See Rule 16(d)(2), Fed.R.Crim.P. (where party fails to comply with discovery rules, court may order discovery or exclude evidence upon such "terms and conditions as are just"), discussed in United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 342 (6th Cir.) (decision whether to impose sanctions for violation of discovery rules is "left to the sound discretion of the trial court"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); 28 U.S.C. § 2001 (a) (judicial sale of really shall be upon such "terms and conditions as are just”), discussed in United States v. Branch Coal Corp., 390 F.2…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Damon White (91-2005), Tina Moss (91-2152), Eric Piekos (91-2168), James Pelzer (91-2169), Samuel Bowe (91-2308), Aaron Brown (91-2403), Joseph Moss (91-2090)
See United States v. Kelley, 849 F.2d 999 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988) 5 Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946) 6 The Mosses and the federal marshals accompanying them were in civilian clothes at the time 7 The Bartkus case is not precisely on point because the exception carved out was based on the Double Jeopardy Clause, which is not implicated here.
cited
Cited "see"
William E. Hutchings Von Ludwitz v. United States of America Mark A. Henry, Warden, Terminal Island Federal Prison
See id.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William R. Mattison
See United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 344-45 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988); United States v. Vincent, 681 F.2d 462, 464 (6th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lee Smith (No. 90-4041), Donald Dozier (No. 90-4062) A/K/A Darrell Thomas
See United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 842 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Frank Johnson v. John C. Gluch, Warden
See Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988). 5 Accordingly, the request for counsel is denied and the district court's judgment is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith A. McCrory
(2×)
See United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 343 (6th Cir.) (government failure to disclose evidence as required by reciprocal discovery order is not reversible error where it only limits the cross-examination of a government witness), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); United States v. Brodie, 871 F.2d 125, 129 (D.C.Cir.1989) (government failure to provide defendant with printed transcript of tape of secretly recorded conversation is not reversible error absent specific request and demonstration of prejudice).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Kelley
See United States v. Kelley, 849 F.2d 999 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morant
See State v. Piskorski, supra, 177 Conn. 716 -17; State v. Manini, supra, 38 Conn. App. 117 -19; see also United States v. Fountain, 840 F.2d 509, 517 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S. Ct. 533 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abraham Jacob Alkhabaz, Also Known as Jake Baker
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 343-44 (6th Cir.) (upholding a conviction for mailing threatening letters from a prison to the White House because a reasonable person would foresee that the recipient of these missives would interpret them as expressions of a serious intention to harm the President, even if no one would reasonably be intimidated by them because the author was incapacitated by incarceration), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); United States v. Lincoln, 462 F.2d 1368, 1369-70 (6th Cir.) (per curiam) (affirming a conviction for a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goldman v. White Rose Distributing Co.
Karlin v. Culkin, 248 N.Y. 465 , 162 N.E. 487, 489 (1928) (Cardozo, C.J.); see also Howell v. State Bar of Tex., 843 F.2d 205, 207 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 531 , 102 L.Ed.2d 563 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vytautus Vebeliunas, Also Known as Vv
The statue of limitations did not bar the bringing of this action. 968 F.2d at 790 ; see also United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705, 713 (2d Cir.1987) ("The limitations period is measured from h~e point at which the crime is complete." (citing Toussie, 397 U.S. at 115 , 90 S.Ct. at 860 )), certs. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 1996, 100 L.Ed.2d 227 , 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 532 , 102 L.Ed.2d 564 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kelly Naples, Jr., United States of America v. Kelly Naples, Jr.
Horodner, 993 F.2d at 196 (concluding that defendant was entitled to a fresh appeal, but declining to entertain pro se arguments in the Sec. 2255 motion because they were best left for the attorney to raise in the direct appeal); see also Tripati v. Herman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.) (ordinarily court will not consider a Sec. 2255 motion while a direct appeal is pending), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988). 1 9 NO. 94-10297 IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Louis Nicholas
See, e.g., Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Francisco Aguilar-Almendarez
See also Kabongo v. INS, 837 F.2d 753, 758 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988). 9 Thus, even if Aguilar-Almendarez had appealed the deportation order, the appeal would have been dismissed under the rule of Morales-Alvarado because his state conviction did become final shortly after the deportation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry Muzika
See, e.g., United States v. Olson, 846 F.2d 1103 , 1115 n. 11 (7th Cir.1988), certiorari denied, 488 U.S. 850 , 109 S.Ct. 131 , 102 L.Ed.2d 104 (analyzing district court decision to dismiss indictment for abuse of discretion); see also United States v. Fountain, 840 F.2d 509, 512 (7th Cir.1988), certiorari denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 564 ; United States v. L'Allier, 838 F.2d 234, 242 (7th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Timothy Thomas v. Edward Brennan, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Oxford, Wisconsin
See, e.g., United States v. Fountain, 840 F.2d 509, 523 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 564 (1989). 4 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bloome
See, e.g., United States v. Fountain, 840 F.2d 509, 517 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 583 , 102 L.Ed.2d 564 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charter Medical Corp.
v.
Cardin
v.
Cardin
No. 88-657.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (2) · Eighth Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.