green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Arguments made during prosecution history are relevant in determining the meaning of the terms at issue. Those arguments ... must be examined to ascertain the true meaning of what the inventor intended to convey in the claims.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
ADE CORP. v. KLA-Tencor Corp.
arguments made during prosecution history are relevant in determining the meaning of the terms at issue. those arguments ... must be examined to ascertain the true meaning of what the inventor intended to convey in the claims.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
EM Bagels, Ltd. v. Bagel Emporium of Armonk, Inc.
those arguments ... must be examined to ascertain the true meaning of what the inventor intended to convey in the claims.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Weatherchem Corp. v. J.L. Clark, Inc.
the requirement of proving no abandonment, suppression or concealment does modify somewhat the 'secret' nature of section 102(g) prior art
cited
Cited "see"
Wisenbaker v. State
See Pyles v. State, 755 S.W.2d 98, 109 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
C.M.L. S.R.L. v. Ineco Industrial Navarra De Equipos Y Comercio, S.A.
See, In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1480 (Fed.Cir.1994) (quoting E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1433 (Fed.Cir.1988) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988)).
cited
Cited "see"
Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d *242 1430, 1436 n. 5 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Schering Corp. v. Amgen, Inc.
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1433 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
McBride v. State
See Pyles v. State, 755 S.W.2d 98, 109 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Dorsey v. State
See Briddle v. State, 742 S.W.2d 379, 388 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. v. Upper Deck Co.
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1433 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988) (claims are to be read in light of the specification); Loctite Corp. v. Ultraseal Ltd., 781 F.2d 861, 867 (Fed.Cir.1985) (terminology in patent claims should be interpreted from the standpoint of one of ordinary skill in the art); Whittaker Corp. v. UNR Indus., Inc., 911 F.2d 709, 712 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1436-37 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Pyles v. State, 755 S.W.2d 98, 111 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988) (hearing on voluntariness of confession); Carrasco v. State, 712 S.W.2d 120, 122 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (hearing on motion to suppress).
cited
Cited "see"
Hathorn v. State
See Briddle v. State, 742 S.W.2d 379, 384 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 341 (Tex.Crim.App.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vaughn v. State
(2×)
The trial judge reviewing answers of an equivocating venireman has the opportunity to observe the tone and demeanor of the prospective juror in determining the precise meaning intended, while we have only the “cold record.” Mowbray v. State, 788 S.W.2d 658, 666 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 999 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1991); see Briddle v. State, 742 S.W.2d 379 , 384 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988); Stanton v. State, 678 S.W.2d 305, 307 (Tex.App—Fort Worth 1984), rev’d on other grounds, 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
Oddzon Products, Inc. v. Imperial Toy Corporation, and Fred Kort
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1438 , 7 USPQ2d 1129, 1135 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 (1986). 8 While the district court properly reads "filaments" to include flimsiness, this meaning does not necessarily exclude the accused Porcupine Bouncer from the scope of the claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Zogbi v. Federated Department Store
See id. (citing Bryant v. Ford Motor Co., 844 F.2d 602, 605 (9th Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. vacated, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988) for the proposition that Doe defendants destroy diversity); 28 U.S.C. sec. 1441 (a) (as amended by the Act, sec. 1016(a); providing that the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mora v. State
(2×)
See Pyles v. State, 755 S.W.2d 98, 116 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988); Mowbray v. State, 788 S.W.2d 658, 664 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1990, pet. filed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dow Chemical Co. v. Astro-Valcour, Inc.
See also E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1433 (Fed.Cir.) (citing Autogiro), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988); McCarty v. Lehigh Valley R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.
See also E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1433 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 542 , 102 L.Ed.2d 572 (1988); Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1571 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Al-Site Corp. v. The Bonneau Company
See, e.g., Jonsson v. Stanley Works, 903 F.2d 812, 818 (Fed.Cir.1990) ("This court has noted that 'arguments made during the prosecution history are relevant in determining the meaning of the terms at issue.' ") (quoting E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 849 F.2d 1430, 1438 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 (1988)). 13 Having concluded that the aperture means of claim 8 is limited to an enclosed hole and equivalents thereof, we turn next to the question of whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the ultimate factual determination of infringement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flores v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Pyles v. State, 755 S.W.2d 98, 107 (Tex. Crim.App.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988); Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 501 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1278 , 117 L.Ed.2d 504 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooks v. State
See, e.g., Pyles v. State, 755 S.W.2d 98, 103 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988); see also Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985); Crane v. State, 786 S.W.2d 338, 343 (Tex.Cr.App.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Almanza v. State
(2×)
Id. at 108 ; see also Briddle v. State, 742 S.W.2d 379 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 986 , 109 S.Ct. 543 , 102 L.Ed.2d 573 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Granite Rock Co.
v.
Building Materials & Construction Teamsters Local 216
v.
Building Materials & Construction Teamsters Local 216
No. 88-618.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1988.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.