green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
“howing the jury that the defendant 'only' had a prior misdemeanor conviction, which the defendant attempted to do, is not 'good character' evidence which a defendant has the right to introduce when he takes the stand”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Kiser
howing the jury that the defendant 'only' had a prior misdemeanor conviction, which the defendant attempted to do, is not 'good character' evidence which a defendant has the right to introduce when he takes the stand
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fisher
See State v. Maisonet, 16 Conn. App. 89, 97 , 546 A.2d 951 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1086 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S. Ct. 1127 , 103 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Christie
Accord, Kovats v. Rutgers, the State University, 822 F.2d 1303 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, Varma v. Bloustein, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1126 , 103 L.Ed.2d 188 (1989) (university mostly funded by state funds not afforded Eleventh Amendment immunity).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hall
See State v. Maisonet, 16 Conn. App. 89, 97 , 546 A.2d 951 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1086 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S. Ct. 1127 , 103 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1992
See Landano v. Rafferty, 856 F.2d 569 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1127 , 103 L.Ed.2d 189 (1989). 13 In June 1989, Landano filed a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to reopen the habeas proceeding because of fraud on the part of the prosecution concerning the suppression of evidence, and requested a temporary restraining order to obtain files from the New Jersey Attorney General and the Hudson County Prosecutor.
discussed
Cited "see"
Landano v. Rafferty
(2×)
See Landano v. Rafferty, 856 F.2d 569 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1127 , 103 L.Ed.2d 189 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Allen
See State v. Johnson, 26 Conn. App. 433, 438-39 , 602 A.2d 36 (1992), citing State v. Lizotte, 200 Conn. 734 , 742A, 517 A.2d 610 (1986), and State v. Maisonet, 16 Conn. App. 89, 97 , 546 A.2d 951 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1086 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S. Ct. 1127 , 103 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony P. Noll D/B/A Noll Oil Company, Plaintiff-Counter v. Ashland Oil, Inc., Defendant-Counter
See Laczay v. Ross Adhesives, A Div. of Conros Corp., 855 F.2d 351, 354 (6th Cir.1988) cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 (1989); Coughlin v. Regan, 768 F.2d 468 (1st Cir.1985). 3 It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joyce Ann Williams, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Children v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation
See Ervin v. County of Los Angeles, 848 F.2d 1018, 1019-20 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1125 , 103 L.Ed.2d 187 (1989); Loehr v. Ventura County Community College Dist., 147 Cal.App.3d 1071, 1084-86 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 576 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.
See, e.g., Jays Foods, Inc. v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 364 (N.D.Ill.1987), aff'd mem., 860 F.2d 1082 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1125 , 103 L.Ed.2d 188 (1989); Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Bachman Co., 659 F.Supp. 1129, 1134 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
University v. A.W. Chesterton
See id. at 533 ("For the purpose of diversity jurisdiction, the determi- native factor is whether the state is the real party in inter- est.") (quoting Krisel v. Duran, 386 F.2d 179, 181 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1042 (1967)); see also Kovats v. Rutgers, 822 F.2d 1303 , 1307 (3d Cir. 1987) (immunity), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 (1987); Ronwin v. Shapiro, 657 F.2d 1071, 1073 (9th Cir. 1981) (Board of Regents of Arizona) (immunity and diversi- ty); Jagnandan v. Giles, 538 F.2d 1166, 1173 (5th Cir. 1976) (Mississippi State University) (immunity), cert. denied, 432 U.S. 910 (1977); Kriege…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
University of Rhode Island v. A.W. Chesterton Company
(2×)
See id. at 533 (“For the purpose of diversity jurisdiction, the determinative factor is whether the state is the real party in interest.”) (quoting Krisel v. Duran, 386 F.2d 179, 181 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1042 , 88 S.Ct. 1635 , 20 L.Ed.2d 303 (1968)); see also Kovats v. Rutgers, 822 F.2d 1303 , 1307 (3d Cir.1987) (immunity), cer t. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1126 , 103 L.Ed.2d 188 (1989); Ronwin v. Shapiro, 657 F.2d 1071, 1073 (9th Cir.1981) (Board of Regents of Arizona) (immunity and diversity); Jagnandan v. Giles, 538 F.2d 1166, 1173 (5th Cir.1976) (Mississippi Sta…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. Detroit Coke Corp.
See, e.g., Laczay v. Ross Adhesives, A Div. of Conros Corp., 855 F.2d 351, 355 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1125 , 103 L.Ed.2d 188 (1989) (holding Hoosier Cardinal required applying the most analogous state statute of limitations to § 301 actions); Laborers' Pension & Trust Fund, supra, 872 F.2d at 706 (6th Cir.1988) (applying Michigan six-year statute of limitations to ERISA collection action on employee benefit packages), and Central States S.E. & S.W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis Ordean Reese v. Thomas A. Fulcomer
See, e.g., Landano v. Rafferty, 856 F.2d 569, 571 (3d Cir.1988) (Big gers’s totality-of-the-circumstances test pertains only to identifications obtained through suggestive means), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1127 , 103 L.Ed.2d 189 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ashkanazy v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.
First Comics, Inc. v. World Color Press, Inc., 884 F.2d 1033, 1039-40 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1123 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1990); see also Jays Foods, Inc. v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 364, 369 (N.D.Ill.1987), aff'd, 860 F.2d 1082 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1014 , 109 S.Ct. 1125 , 103 L.Ed.2d 188 (1989).
Ervin
v.
County of Los Angeles
v.
County of Los Angeles
No. 88-945.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.