green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
López v. United States
See Torres-López v. United States, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1144 , 103 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Lopez v. United States
See Torres-López v. United States, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1144 , 103 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark K. Cross
See U.S. v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1199 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2824 (1991), and U.S. v. Brewer, 853 F.2d 1319, 1322 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 946 (1988) and 489 U.S. 1021 (1989). 16 Because there is no plausible argument that the defendant did not receive actual notice of the government's intent to seek enhanced punishment in this case, we need not address that question in this opinion.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz
See Henderson v. United States, 476 U.S. 321 , 328- ___ _________ _____________ 29 (1986) (indicating that, when a pretrial motion not requiring a hearing is filed with the district court but not ruled upon, 3161(h)(1)(F) and (J) act in unison to exclude 30 days from the speedy trial clock). -16- 16 the clock for all codefendants), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 _____ ______ (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Brewer v. United States
See United States v. Brewer, 841 F.2d 667 (6th Cir.), modified on rehearing, 853 F.2d 1319 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 (1989). 4 In his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , petitioner claimed his counsel's assistance was ineffective in two respects: 1) counsel advised petitioner to refuse a plea offer of seven years because he was confident a motion to suppress would be successful; and 2) after the initial appellate decision and prior to rehearing, counsel failed to inform petitioner of a second offer of seven years.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold C. Martin
For Sec. 924(e) enhancement purposes, nonviolent, commercial burglaries count, United States v. Taylor, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 2158 (1990); see United States v. Gallman, 907 F.2d 639, 644 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 1110 (1991), but their age does not, see United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 973 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 (1989); United States v. Preston, 910 F.2d 81, 89 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 1002 (1991). 5 The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. * After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentative…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Britt
See United States v. Hawley, 855 F.2d 595, 603 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1020 , 109 S.Ct. 1141 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Linda Kowalski, A/K/A Linda Larochelle, Etc. v. Richard J. Gagne, Aetna Life and Casualty Company, in Intervention v. Richard Joseph Gagne and Linda Kowalski, A/K/A Linda Larochelle as the Administratrix of the Estate of Robert John Kowalski, in Intervention
(2×)
See United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 973 (7th Cir.1988) ("[W]e know of no principle making the judgment of conviction the exclusive means by which the fact of conviction may be proved."), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989); United States v. Arriaga-Segura, 743 F.2d 1434, 1436 (9th Cir.1984) ("We nevertheless refuse to hold that a certified copy of a prior conviction is the only evidence sufficient to prove a prior conviction."). 23 In this case, the lower court took judicial notice of defendant's conviction under Fed.R.Evid. 201.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kowalski v. Gagne
(2×)
See United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 973 (7th Cir.1988) (“[W]e know of no principle making the judgment of conviction the exclusive means by which the fact of conviction may be proved.”), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989); United States v. Arriaga-Segura, 743 F.2d 1434, 1436 (9th Cir.1984) (“We nevertheless refuse to hold that a certified copy of a prior conviction is the only evidence sufficient to prove a prior conviction.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mahone
McAfee, 808 F.2d at 863-64 ; see also United States v. Torres Lopez, 851 F.2d 520, 525-26 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1144 , 103 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perriman v. State
(2×)
In this respect, we consider the federal rule, which requires a trial judge to answer a jury question with "concrete accuracy," Bollenbach v. United States, 326 U.S. 607, 613 , 66 S.Ct. 402, 405 , 90 L.Ed. 350, 354 (1946); see also United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989); United States v. Zabic, 745 F.2d 464 (7th Cir.1984), has much to recommend it in terms of what we think is a trial judge's affirmative duty appropriately to assist the jury in rendering a just verdict.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perriman v. State
(2×)
In this respect, we consider that the federal rule, which requires a trial judge to answer a jury question with "concrete accuracy,” Bollenbach v. United States, 326 U.S. 607, 613 , 66 S.Ct. 402, 405 , 90 L.Ed. 350, 354 (1946); see also United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989); United States v. Zabic, 745 F.2d 464 (7th Cir.1984), has much to recommend it in terms of what we think is a trial judge's affirmative duty appropriately to assist the jury in rendering a just verdict.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ingram
United States v. Milton, 52 F.3d 78, 80 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 3246 (U.S. Oct. 2, 1995) (No. 95-5231); see, e.g., United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968 , 971- 72 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodney Keith Ingram
United States v. Milton, 52 F.3d 78, 80 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 64 U.S.L.W. 3246 (U.S. Oct. 2, 1995) (No. 95-5231); see, e.g., United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 971-72 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 (1989). 4 Here, Deputy Webster followed Ingram for a mile with his blue police lights flashing.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Loder
See also United States v. Torres Lopez, 851 F.2d 520, 527 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1144 , 103 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elson Strahan, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 971-72 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989); United States v. Cotton, 751 F.2d 1146, 1149 (10th Cir.1985); United States v. McCrady, 774 F.2d 868, 871-72 (8th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Francis M. Wallen, A/K/A Frank Wallen
See, e.g., United States v. Torres Lopez, 851 F.2d 520, 525 (1st Cir.1988) (“a RICO conspiracy ... continues as long as its purposes have neither been abandoned nor accomplished”), cer t. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1144 , 103 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Baker
(2×)
See also United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Jean Theresius Filippi
Id. at 1303 ; see also United States v. Torres López, 851 F.2d 520, 527 (1st Cir.1988), reh’g denied, cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1144 , 103 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Highfill
v.
Wisconsin
v.
Wisconsin
No. 88-5857.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1989.
Cited by 49 opinions | Published
Ct. App. Wis. Cer-tiorari denied.