green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Moss v. Board of Education of the Brentwood Union Free School District
See Wilder v. Thomas, 854 F.2d 605, 616 (2d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aisenberg
See City of Brunswick v. United States, 849 F.2d 501 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1313 , 103 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bloch v. Temple University
As the Seventh Circuit stated in Smith , “the content of some remarks may lift the speech to the level of public concern even if the employee’s reasons for speaking out are entirely self-interested.” Smith, 28 F.3d at 652 (citations omitted); see Belk v. Town of Minocqua, 858 F.2d 1258, 1263-64 (7th Cir.1988) (“content is the greatest single factor in the Connick inquiry”) (quoting Berg v. Hunter, 854 F.2d 238, 242-43 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1314 , 103 L.Ed.2d 583 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n v. Montgomery County, Md.
See Wilder v. Thomas, 854 F.2d 605, 613-14 (2d Cir.1988) (CAA citizen suit provisions unavailable for challenges to actions that are valid under applicable state implementation plans), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 (1989) Because of our conclusion with regard to Sugarloaf's invocation of the CAA federal citizen suit provision, we do not consider the merits of Appellees' affirmative defense that, because the permits for this facility were issued prior to the implementation of the new ozone offset requirements, the permits are excused from the offset requirements under Maryland's still-pending pro…
cited
Cited "see"
Unroe v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Treasury (In Re Unroe)
See Harrison v. C.I.R., 854 F.2d 263 , 265 n. 3 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1313 , 103 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989) (noting split in authorities, but not taking position).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eldon E. Kuhns v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
See City of Brunswick v. United States, 849 F.2d 501 , 503 n. 2 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1313 , 103 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989); American Pacific Concrete Pipe Co. v. NLRB, 788 F.2d 586, 590-91 (9th Cir.1986); Continental Web Press, Inc. v. NLRB, 767 F.2d 321 , 323 (7th Cir.1985). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas Rocco v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension And Retirement Fund
See, e.g., Baum v. Nolan, 853 F.2d 1071 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1313 , 103 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989); Wenzel v. Commissioner, 707 F.2d 694 (2d Cir.1983); New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Ret.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rocco v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
See, e.g., Baum v. Nolan, 853 F.2d 1071 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1313 , 103 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989); Wenzel v. Commissioner, 707 F.2d 694 (2d Cir.1983); New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Ret.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kokkinis v. Ivkovich
See Belk v. Town of Minocqua, 858 F.2d 1258 , 1262 & n.6 (7th Cir. 1988); Vukadinovich v. Bartels, 853 F.2d 1387, 1389-90 (7th Cir. 1988). 14 The first step of this analysis--determining whether the plaintiff's speech was constitutionally protected--is a question of law for the court, see Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 148 n.7 (1983); see also Berg v. Hunter, 854 F.2d 238, 243 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 (1989); Hesse v. Board of Educ. of Township High Sch.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kokkinis v. Ivkovich
The first step of this analysis— determining whether the plaintiffs speech was constitutionally protected — is a question of law for the court, see Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 148 n. 7, 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); see also Berg v. Hunter, 854 F.2d 238, 243 (7th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1314 , 103 L.Ed.2d 583 (1989); Hesse v. Board of Educ. of Township High Sch.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burkes v. Klauser
(2×)
See, e.g., Berg v. Hunter, 854 F.2d 238, 242 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied 489 U.S. 1053 (1989) (a public school teacher's comments about misrepresentations of salaries and unwarranted salary increases were matters of public concern); 13 Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 389 (7th Cir. 1988) (parties concede that public employees' speech about the proper use of public funds is a matter of public concern); Rookard v. Health and Hospitals Corporation, 710 F.2d 41 (2d Cir. 1983) (employee's speech about wasteful practices and possible hospital mismanagement was a matter of public concern); Hamer v…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth J. Conte and Laura Conte v. Karen L. Justice
See also Wilder v. Thomas, 854 F.2d 605, 617 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1314 , 103 L.Ed.2d 583 (1989); Norris v. Grosvenor Mktg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Itt Corporation, and Affiliated Companies v. United States
“Under collateral estoppel, once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision may preclude relitigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action involving a *564 party to the first case.” Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 , 101 S.Ct. 411, 414 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); see also, Wilder v. Thomas, 854 F.2d 605, 616 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1314 , 103 L.Ed.2d 583 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valley National Bank v. James Abdnor
See also Citizens Marine Nat'l Bank v. United States Dep't of Commerce, 854 F.2d 223 , 228 (7th Cir.1988) (cumulative effect of various imprudent acts by bank excused SBA from honoring guaranty agreement), cert. denied sub nom., Bank One, Stevens Point, NA v. United States Dep't of Commerce, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1312 , 103 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989); Pittsburgh Nat'l Bank v. Abdnor, 898 F.2d 334 (3d Cir.1990) (bank failed to service loan prudently by delaying the cashing of a check).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valley National Bank v. Abdnor
See also Citizens Marine Nat’l Bank v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, 854 F.2d 223 , 228 (7th Cir.1988) (cumulative effect of various imprudent acts by bank excused SBA from honoring guaranty agreement), cert. denied sub nom., Bank One, Stevens Point, NA v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, 489 U.S. 1053 , 109 S.Ct. 1312 , 103 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989); Pittsburgh Nat’l Bank v. Abdnor, 898 F.2d 334 (3d Cir.1990) (bank failed to service loan prudently by delaying the cashing of a check).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bank One, Stevens Point, NA
v.
United States Department of Commerce
v.
United States Department of Commerce
No. 88-940.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1989.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.