green
Positive treatment
7.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Goddess and Baker Wacker L.L.C. v. Sterling Bay Companies, L.L.C
See United States v. Muskovsky, 863 F.2d 1319, 1325 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 (1989); CivCon, 2020 WL 6075869 , at *4 (interstate commerce element of RICO claim requires “de minimis effects”).
cited
Cited "see"
The Glocoms Group, Inc. v. Center for Public Integrity
See Lee v. Dong-A Ilbo, 849 F.2d 876 , 878 (4th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harleysville Insurance v. Ermar Painting & Contracting, Inc.
“The burden rests on the defendant challenging the forum to demonstrate that private or public interests militate against litigation going forward in this State, and the determination of the court will not be disturbed on appeal unless the court has failed to properly consider all the relevant factors” (Cheggour v R’Kiki, supra at 508; see National Bank & Trust Co. of N. Am,., Ltd. v Banco De Vizcaya, S.A., 72 NY2d 1005 [1988], cert denied 489 US 1067 [1989]).
examined
Cited "see"
Medure v. Vindicator Printing Co.
(4×)
See Lee v. Dong-A Iibo, 849 F.2d 876 (4th Cir.1988) (the press release of two South Korean intelligence agencies reporting the involvement of a South Korean eitizen-New York resident in a North Korean spy ring and six newspapers’ republication of that release were not covered by the fair report privilege), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1343 , 103 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wimmer Canada, Inc. v. Abele Tractor & Equipment Co.
Finally, we perceive no abuse of discretion in Supreme Court’s conclusion that defendant failed to demonstrate that the Canadian court was “a seriously inconvenient forum for the trial of the action” (CPLR 5304 [b] [7]; see National Bank & Trust Co. of N. Am. v Banco De Vizcaya, 72 NY2d 1005, 1007 , cert denied 489 US 1067 ; Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 478-479 , cert denied 469 US 1108 ), a discretionary basis for nonrecognition of a foreign court judgment which should generally not be invoked “unless New York in an analogous situation would have dismissed the case…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Callan
(2×)
See Walters v. First Tenn. Bank, N.A., 855 F.2d 267 , 275-76 n. 5 (6th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct 1344 , 103 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989); see also Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 797 F.2d 1417, 1430 (7th Cir.1986) (holding that issues cannot be preserved by reference to documents filed in the district court; issues must be argued to be preserved). .
examined
Cited "see"
Moore v. Willis Independent School District
(3×)
A plaintiff . . . may invoke § 1983 regardless of any state-tort remedy that might be available to compensate him for the deprivation of these rights.") (citations omitted). 7 900 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1990); see Cunningham v. Beavers, 858 F.2d 269 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 (1989) (construing Texas law); Woodard v. Los Fresnos Ind. Sch.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gens v. Resolution
See Butcher v. Cessna ___ _______ ______ Aircraft Co., 850 F.2d 247, 248 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, _____________ _____ ______ 489 U.S. 1067 (1989); In re Leonardi's Int'l, Inc., 123 B.R. 668 , ____________________________ 669 (Bankr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.
(2×)
See Butcher v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 850 F.2d 247, 248 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1343 , 103 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989); In re Leonardi's Int’l, Inc., 123 B.R. 668, 669 (Bankr.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Dinome, Henry Borelli
See United States v. Pugliese, 860 F.2d 25, 30 (2d Cir.1988) (no conflict when oral sentence silent as to whether it was to be served consecutive to or concurrent with an earlier sentence, and a written order making sentence consecutive), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 (1989); United States v. Moyles, 724 F.2d 29, 30-31 (2d Cir.1983) (no conflict when oral sentence silent as to whether two consecutive sentences were to be served consecutively to a third and a written order stating that all three would be served consecutively).
discussed
Cited "see"
Corporate Training Unlimited, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.
(2×)
See Lee v. Dong-A Ilbo, 849 F.2d 876 , 879 (4th Cir. 1988) (holding that the fair report privilege should not be extended to include a foreign government’s report because the reasons for the use of the privilege do not apply with sufficient force in the context of foreign government reports and because additional considerations exist that mitigate against applying the privilege to foreign government reports), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1343 , 103 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989); Paul Bech, Isolating the Marketplace of Ideas from the World: Lee v. Dong-A Ilbo and the Fair Report Privilege, 50…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carluin Sanchez
See United States v. Muskovsky, 863 F.2d 1319, 1322-24 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1345 , 103 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Irving Peters
See United States v. Muskovsky, 863 F.2d 1319, 1326 (7th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1345 , 103 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saylor v. Board of Education
(2×)
See also Cunningham v. Beavers, 858 F.2d 269 , 271 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1343 , 103 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989) (no substantive due process claim was stated where a teacher and school principal punished girls five and six years old for “snickering,” the punishment having consisted of five swats with a wooden paddle and the girls’ buttocks having been bruised to an extent that led a local child welfare office to state “the situation clearly constituted child abuse”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Berry
See also United States v. Mukovsky, 863 F.2d 1319, 1325 (7th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1345 , 103 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warmus v. Hank
See, e.g., Walters v. First Tenn. Bank, N.A., 855 F.2d 267, 271 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 (1989) (refusing to resolve on appeal a statute of limitations issue not raised at trial); Roth Steel Tube Co. v. C.I.R., 800 F.2d 625, 632 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canaday v. Kelley
See, e.g., Walters v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A., 855 F.2d 267, 271 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 (1989) (refusing to resolve on appeal a statute of limitations issue not raised at trial); Roth Steel Tube Co. v. C.I.R., 800 F.2d 625, 632 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington, DC v. Webster
(2×)
See, e.g., Walters v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A., 855 F.2d 267, 274 (6th Cir.1988), cert, denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1344 , 103 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John L. St. Cyr
See, e.g., United States v. Muskovsky, 863 F.2d 1319, 1327 (7th Cir.1988) (construing the phrase “business, enterprise” in the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952 ), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1345 , 103 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. St. Cyr
See, e.g., United States v. Muskovsky, ___ ____ _____________ _________ 863 F.2d 1319, 1327 (7th Cir. 1988) (construing the phrase "business enterprise" in the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. 1952), cert. _____ denied, 489 U.S. 1067 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny C. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ann CROWE, Defendant, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See also Walters v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A., 855 F.2d 267, 271 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 1344 , 103 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989) (court declining to resolve issue concerning tolling of limitations period that was first raised on appeal by plaintiff).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Bank & Trust Co. of North America, Ltd., dba NATCORP
v.
Banco de Vizcaya, S. A.
v.
Banco de Vizcaya, S. A.
No. 88-1143.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 6, 1989.
Cited by 26 opinions | Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.