green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…e approve the death sentence on the basis that a jury recommendation of death is entitled to great weight
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sochor v. Florida
(2×)
e approve the death sentence on the basis that a jury recommendation of death is entitled to great weight
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Rios
the sixth amendment's right to confrontation, as incorporated into the fourteenth amendment, guarantees a defendant the right to be present when a witness is testifying against him during trial
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hankison v. Board of Prison Terms
a habeas petitioner must show that the prosecutor or other government officer knew the testimony in question was false in order to prevail
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Spisak v. Mitchell
No. 03-4034 Spisak v. Mitchell Page 10 296 (Ohio 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beuke v. Houk
(2×)
See Beuke v. Ohio, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1356 , 103 L.Ed.2d 823 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grossman v. Crosby
See Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989), and Grossman v. Dugger, 708 So.2d 249 (Fla.1997), in which the Florida Supreme Court set out the facts of the case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Byron Ashley Parker v. Frederick J. Head
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 744 (4th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989); United States v. Butler, 822 F.2d 1191 , 1195 n.2 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Byron Ashley Parker v. Frederick J. Head
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 744 (4th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989); United States v. Butler, 822 F.2d 1191 , 1195 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1987) (listing the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits as continuing to apply Remmer).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Dewey Glock v. Harry K. Singletary
See Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446, 1448 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989) (describing the Mississippi Supreme Court's role in capital sentencing). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. Curcio
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 744 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989); United States v. Butler, 822 F.2d 1191 , 1195 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Rodgers
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 468-69 (6th Cir.1988) (opening the door precludes a party from complaining about the introduction of similar evidence by the opposing party), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989), and cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Carl Sutton, Jr. v. United States
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 469 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 and 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Windsor
See United States v. Weisman, 858 F.2d 389, 391 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McGlory
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 467 (6th Cir.1988) (recognizing probative value of notes, receipts and telephone numbers found in co-conspirator’s apartment), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Vira Kulkovit, United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Melvin Hauser, United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Reginald D. McGlory United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Charles Cotton
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 467 (6th Cir.1988) (recognizing probative value of notes, receipts and telephone numbers found in coconspirator's apartment), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
Accord Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Owen v. State
See Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Klokoc v. State
See Harich v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marvin Edwin Johnson v. Harry K. Singletary, Jr., Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
(2×)
See generally Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446, 1451 (11th Cir.1988) (collecting additional cases), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989). 158 Thus the question before the court is whether the sentencing judge would have overridden the jury's recommendation of life if counsel had adduced the evidence now proffered establishing the three statutory mitigating circumstances, and whether the Florida Supreme Court would have vacated any such override. 14 Relevant to this inquiry is the fact that the Florida Supreme Court "frequently has reversed jury overrides where the…
cited
Cited "see"
Espinosa v. State
See Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephen Todd Booker v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446 , 1448 n. 4 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989); Cooper v. Wainwright, 807 F.2d 881, 886-87 (11th Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1050 , 107 S.Ct. 2183 , 95 L.Ed.2d 839 (1987); Oliver v. Wainwright, 795 F.2d 1524, 1528-29 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 921 , 107 S.Ct. 1380 , 94 L.Ed.2d 694 (1987); see also Messer v. Florida, 834 F.2d 890, 892-93 (11th Cir.1987) (because Florida treated Hitchcock 's holding as a significant change in the law that excused a procedural default, that claim …
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
The en banc court then explained the rationale behind this test: 131 When a trial court does not correct misleading comments as to the jury's sentencing role, the state has violated the defendant's eighth amendment rights because the court has given the state's imprimatur to those comments; the effect is the same as if the trial court had actually instructed the jury that the prosecutor's comments represented a correct statement of the law.... [O]ur focus is ultimately on the trial court's actions.... 132 Id. at 1457 (citation omitted); see Harich v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1464, 1478 (11th Cir.1988)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Donnell Becton v. Talmadge Barnett Attorney General of North Carolina
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 745 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989) (federal *1196 habeas court properly held an evidentiary hearing since the merits of the factual dispute were not resolved in the state hearings).
discussed
Cited "see"
WARDEN v. SPISAK CERTIORARI TO THE
(2×)
Compare Williams v. Taylor, 529 U. S. 362, 390 (2000) (Stevens, J., for the Court) (applicable date for purposes of determining whether “Federal law” is “established” is when the “state-court conviction became final”), with id., at 412 (O’Connor, J., for the Court) (applicable date is “the time of the relevant state-court decision”); see State v. Spisak, 36 Ohio St. 3d 80 , 521 N. E. 2d 800 (decided Apr. 13, 1988), cert. denied, 489 U. S. 1071 (decided Mar. 6, 1989); Mills v. Maryland, supra (decided June 6, 1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Executive Director of the Department of Corrections
See also, Harich v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1464, 1472 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989) (failure to present expert testimony on intoxication in the guilt/innocence phase of murder case not likely to have affected outcome of case because evidence that defendant was suffering from alcohol idiosyncratic intoxication at the time of the crime would have implicated him in the murder in contradiction of his own testimony).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kearse v. State
Even though Kearse may have been motivated by his desire to avoid arrest when he took the gun, the incident still constituted a robbery because it involved "the taking of ... property which may be the subject of larceny from the person or custody of another when in the course of the taking there is the use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear." § 812.13(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); see also Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988) (evidence that defendant wrestled officer's weapon away and fired fatal shot into officer's head supported felony murder instruction based on robbery), cer…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Danny Eugene Esslinger v. Leoneal Davis, Warden Attorney General of the State of Alabama
See, e.g., Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446 , 1448 n. 4 (11th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher Bibbins v. Stephen Dalsheim, Superintendent of Downstate Correctional Facility
See Fed.R.Evid. 1101(e) (Federal Rules of Evidence govern proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ); see also Stockton v. Commonwealth of Va., 852 F.2d 740, 743-44 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steven M. Cooley v. Crispus Nix
See, e.g., United States v. Weisman, 858 F.2d 389, 391 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989); United States v. Payne, 923 F.2d 595, 598 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 2830 (1991); Nivica, 887 F.2d at 1121 . 4 Having broad discretion to deny hybrid representation and to circumscribe counsel's role if hybrid representation is granted, a trial court necessarily has the discretion to place restrictions on standby counsel's in-court role in cases of pure self-representation.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Coulter
See, also, State v. Clark (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 252, 256 , 527 N.E.2d 844, 849 , certiorari denied (1989), 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 823 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brian A. Church v. George E. Sullivan
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a ... trial by an impartial jury ... [and to] be confronted with the witnesses against him[.]” Indeed, claims of improper juror contact touch “the core of the Sixth Amendment’s right to ... an impartial jury[.]” United States v. Day, 830 F.2d 1099, 1103 (10th Cir.1987); see also Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 743 (4th Cir.1988) (“No right touches more …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul Kordenbrock v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
(2×)
See, e.g., Harich v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1464, 1473-74 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989) (Florida); see also Project, Nineteenth Annual Review of Crim.Proc.: United States Sup.Ct. and Cts. of App. 1988-89, 78 Geo.L.J. 669, 1294 n. 2747 (1990) (noting that Florida, Alabama, and Indiana use a jury recommendation system as an advisory opinion for trial judge).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Green
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-6487.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 6, 1989.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.