green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.3 score
“the extradited party may be tried for a crime other than that for which he was surrendered if the asylum country consents.”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Mee v. Ortega
See also Ray v. Pickett, 734 F.2d 370, 374 (8th Cir.1984) (qualified immunity for parole officer filing violation report); but see Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 998 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Mee v. Ortega
See also Ray v. Pickett, 734 F.2d 370, 374 (8th Cir.1984) (qualified immunity for parole officer filing violation report); but see Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 998 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
John Graham v. Darin Young
the extradited party may be tried for a crime other than that for which he was surrendered if the asylum country consents.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brown v. California Department of Corrections
(2×)
This prosecutorial immunity extends to individuals serving prosecutorial functions at administrative hearings.” Id. at 996 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Andre Pryor v. Melinda Nowicki
See Kirkendall v. Grambling & Mounce, Inc., 4 F.3d 989 (5th Cir. 1993) (quoting Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 995 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See Mitchell , 944 F.2d at 230 (quoting Johnson v. Kegans , 870 F.2d 992 , 995 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989) ) ("The judge is absolutely immune for all judicial acts 'not performed in clear absence of all jurisdiction, however erroneous the act and however evil the motive.' ").
discussed
Cited "see"
Turnbull v. Desrosier
Accord Peninsula Cruise, 257 Va. at 319 , 512 S.E.2d at 562 . “[A]n examination of the history of litigation involving the limits placed by the Due Process Clause on the power of state courts to enter binding judgments against persons not served within their boundaries shows a “clearly discernible” trend “toward expanding the permissible scope of state jurisdiction over foreign corporations and other nonresidents.” Nan Ya Plastics Corp. U.S.A. v. DeSantis, 237 Va. 255, 259 , 377 S.E.2d 381, 391 , cert denied 492 U.S. 921 (1989) quoting McGee v. International Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Celli v. Shoell
See Montero v. Meyer, 861 F.2d 603, 609 (10th Cir.1988)(stating that a regulation cannot be interpreted so as “to thwart the mandate of the relevant statute”), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3249 , 106 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Quartararo v. Catterson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 997 (5th Cir.) (“The functioning of a parole board [in determining whether to grant parole] is quasi-judicial.”), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989); Allen v. Thompson, 815 F.2d 1433, 1434 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (“Parole decisions are the continuation of the sentencing process_”); Sellars, 641 F.2d at 1302-03 (state parole board officials are absolutely immune from suit for actions taken when processing parole applications, because parole board officials perform functionally comparable tasks to judges when the…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Karl Hofstatter (92-1836) and Michael Griffor (92-1805)
See United States v. Zalman, 870 F.2d 1047, 1053 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3248 , 106 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth A. Weiner (91-1551) and Steven M. Lewin (91-1582)
See United States v. Zalman, 870 F.2d 1047, 1056 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3248 , 106 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
DeCamp v. Douglas County Franklin Grand Jury
See Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 996 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989). 13 Grand jurors possess absolute immunity because like a judge they must "exercise a discretionary judgment on the basis of evidence presented to them." Imbler, 424 U.S. at 423 n. 20, 96 S.Ct. at 991 n. 20.
cited
Cited "see"
DeCamp v. Douglas County Franklin Grand Jury
See Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 996 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Montero v. Meyer
See Montero v. Meyer, 861 F.2d 603 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3249 , 106 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James E. Campbell
See United States v. Zalman, 870 F.2d 1047 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 (1976). 12 Campbell argues that the district court should have granted severance in this case because of a prejudicial spillover effect of evidence relating to Gonzalez' drug activities in the spring of 1989.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Lynn Young v. Neil B. Biggers, Jr., J.W. Collins
See Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 995 (5th Cir.) (holding that judges are absolutely immune for judicial acts unless performed in clear absence of jurisdiction), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James W. Wade
See United States v. Iredia, 866 F.2d 114, 119 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mack v. Bowie County Detention Center
The Fifth Circuit has explained in this regard that “a judge will not be deprived of immunity because the action he took was in error, was done maliciously, or was in excess of his authority; rather, he will be subject to liability only when he has acted in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.” May v. Sudderth, 97 F.3d 107, 110-111 (5th Cir. 1996), citing Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356-57 (1978); see also Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 995 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 (1989) (judge is absolutely immune from all judicial acts “not performed in clear absence of all juri…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hulsey v. Owens
See also Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 995-96 (5th Cir.) (discussing history of absolute immunity for parole board members, equating their function to that of judges and labeling the parole board’s function "quasi-judicial"), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989); Farrish v. Mississippi State Parole Bd., 836 F.2d 969, 974 (5th Cir.1988) (focusing on the nature of the official’s responsibilities and not on the official’s status or rank); Cruz v. Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101, 1102 (5th Cir.1974) (granting absolute immunity to parole board members when they are "…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pinaud v. County of Suffolk
See Allen v. Thompson, 815 F.2d 1433, 1434 (11th Cir.1987) (allegedly malicious letter written by prosecutor to Bureau of Prisons and Parole Commission covered by absolute immunity); see also Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 997-98 (5th Cir.) (prosecutor’s statements to parole board protected by absolute immunity), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pinaud v. County Of Suffolk
See Allen v. Thompson, 815 F.2d 1433, 1434 (11th Cir.1987) (allegedly malicious letter written by prosecutor to Bureau of Prisons and Parole Commission covered by absolute immunity); see also Johnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 997-98 (5th Cir.) (prosecutor's statements to parole board protected by absolute immunity), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mattvidi Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Nationsbank of Virginia, N.A.
See, e.g., Nan Ya Plastics Corp. U.S.A. v. De Santis, 237 Va. 255 , 377 S.E.2d 388, 393 , cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3248 , 106 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989) (burden of proof to establish impossibility of performance of contract is on party who asserts it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Corgain
See, e.g., United States v. Iredia, 866 F.2d 114 , 119 ___ ____ _____________ ______ (5th Cir.) (most of trial judge's suggestions to prosecutor about how to improve his presentation were in the nature of exercising firm control over the trial, and did not deprive defendants of fair trial), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 (1989). ____________ Judges have the right and indeed the duty to exercise fair control over the conduct of a trial.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Corgain
See, e.g., United States v. Iredia, 866 F.2d 114, 119 (5th Cir.) (most of trial judge’s suggestions to prosecutor about how to improve his presentation were in the nature of exercising firm control over the trial, and did not deprive defendants of fair trial), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Casel
See, e.g., United States v. Iredia, 866 F.2d 114, 117 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 (1989); United States v. Lowenberg, 853 F.2d 295, 301 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1032 (1989); United States v. Diaz-Carreon, 915 F.2d 951, 956 (5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 11 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lynn Casel, A/K/A \Polo\"
See, e.g., United States v. Iredia, 866 F.2d 114, 117 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3250 , 106 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989); United States v. Lowenberg, 853 F.2d 295, 301 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1032 , 109 S.Ct. 1170 , 103 L.Ed.2d 228 (1989); United States v. Diaz-Carrean, 915 F.2d 951, 956 (5th Cir.1990); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 11 , 105 5.Ct. 1038, 1044, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walters
See Lombardo v. U.S., 865 F.2d 155, 159-160 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); See also U.S. v. Diwan, 864 F.2d 715, 719-20 (11th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3249 , 106 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sharifinassab
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-1941.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 3, 1989.
492 U.S. 921
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.