green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
BROUSSARD BY LORD v. School Bd. of City of Norfolk
limitations on speech that would be unconstitutional outside the schoolhouse are not necessarily unconstitutional within it.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blechman
See United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 665-66 (2nd Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Naftchi v. New York University
See Ottaviani v. State Univ. of N.Y., 875 F.2d 365 , 371 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 721 , 107 L.Ed.2d 740 (1990) ("Before a deviation from a predicted outcome can be considered probative, the deviation must be 'statistically significant.’ ”); see also W.G.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lynch
See United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 659 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990) (criminal contempt sanctions may be imposed only if it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the contemnor willfully violated the specific and definite terms of a court order); S.E.C. v. American Bd. Of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 439 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Dubowsky v. Stern, Lavinthal, Norgaard & Daly
See Ottaviani v. State Univ. of New York, 679 F.Supp. 288, 338 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff'd, 875 F.2d 365 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 721 , 107 L.Ed.2d 740 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bailey, Vaught, Robertson and Co. v. Remington Investments, Inc.
See Yiamouyiannis v. Thompson, 764 S.W.2d 338, 342 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, writ denied), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Marvin Miller and Richard Miller v. Mark Prange, M.D.
See Goad v. Goad , 768 S.W.2d 356, 358 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 1021 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry
See United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 659 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Whitney Sand & Gravel, Inc.
See Goad v. Goad, 768 S.W.2d 356, 360 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990); Mid-Continent Casualty Co. *806 v. Whatley, 742 S.W.2d 475, 479 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, no writ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Feliciano v. Autozone, Inc.
Aragon v. Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc., 292 F.3d 654, 663 (9th Cir. 2002); id. (statistics must show a stark pattern of discrimination unexplainable on grounds other than [discrimination on the basis of membership in the protected class] . . .); see also Ottaviani v. State University of New York, 875 F.2d 365, 371 (2d Cir. 1989) (in individual disparate treatment actions, [w]here gross statistical disparities can be shown, they alone may in a proper case constitute prima facie proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination . . .), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S. Ct. 721 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larry James McGee v. State
See also Goad v. Goad, 768 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990) (finding complaint concerning judicial notice waived absent objection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albano Vasquez Badillo v. State
See also Goad v. Goad, 768 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990) (finding complaint concerning judicial notice waived absent objection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albano Vasquez Badillo v. State
See also Goad v. Goad, 768 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990) (finding complaint concerning judicial notice waived absent objection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albano Vasquez Badillo v. State
See also Goad v. Goad, 768 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990) (finding complaint concerning judicial notice waived absent objection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Julio Antonio Nevarez v. State
See also Goad v. Goad, 768 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990) (finding complaint concerning judicial notice waived absent objection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Therese Ann Ladd v. State
See also Goad v. Goad, 768 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 1989, writ denied), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990) (finding complaint concerning judicial notice waived absent objection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New Times, Inc. v. Isaacks
See, e.g., Carr, 776 S.W.2d at 570 (stating, "[a]ll assertions of opinion are protected by the [F]irst [A]mendment....”); Howell v. Hecht, 821 S.W.2d 627, 631 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1991, writ denied) (same); Brewer, 986 S.W.2d at 643 (categorically stating, "an opinion cannot form the basis of a defamation action”); see also Yiamouyiannis v. Thompson, 764 S.W.2d 338, 340 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1988, writ denied) (holding distinction between opinion and fact elevated to constitutional status), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 742 (1990). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hodge
Sand et al., Modem Federal Jury Instmctions: Cnminal, ¶ 20.02, at 20-26.1 (1994); see also Rojas v. United States, 55 F.3d 61, 63 (2d Cir.1995) (per curiam) (federal court may punish, by fine or imprisonment, a person who “ Svillfully violate[s] the specific and definite terms of a court order’ ”) (quoting United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 659 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bruce Cutler
Sand et al., Modem Federal Jury Instructions: Criminal, 120.02, at 20-26.1 (1994); see also Rojas v. United States, 55 F.3d 61, 63 (2d Cir.1995) (per curiam) (federal court may punish, by fine or imprisonment, a person who “ ‘willfully violate[s] the specific and definite terms of a court order’ ”) (quoting United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 659 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barcia v. Sitkin
Local 580, 925 F.2d at 594 (citing to E.E.O.C. v. Local 28, 753 F.2d 1172 , 1178 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd, 478 U.S. 421 , 106 S.Ct. 3019 , 92 L.Ed.2d 344 (1986)); see also United States v. 20th Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 659 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990) (contempt occurs when a party violates specific and definite terms of a court order).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) ("[f]indings of fact ... shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous"); see also Ottaviani v. SUNY, 875 F.2d 365 , 375 (2d Cir.1989) ("under the clearly erroneous standard, we may only reject findings by the trial court when we are left with the 'definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed' ") (quoting United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 721 , 107 L.Ed.2d 740 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) (“[findings of fact ... shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”); see also Ottaviani v. SUNY, 875 F.2d 365 , 375 (2d Cir.1989) (“under the clearly erroneous standard, we may only reject findings by the trial court when we are left with the ‘definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed’”) (quoting United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 721 , 107 L.Ed.2d 740 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stockschlaeder & McDonald, Esqs. v. Kittay (In Re Stockbridge Funding Corp.)
Compare EEOC v. Local 580, supra, 925 F.2d at 594 (proof by clear and convincing evidence for civil contempt), with United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 659 (2d Cir.1989) (proof beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal contempt), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 722 , 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Nassau
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 431 U.S. at 336 , 97 S.Ct. at 1855 ; see also *1411 Ottaviani v. State University of New York at New Paltz, 679 F.Supp. 288, 297 , aff'd, 875 F.2d 365 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021 , 110 S.Ct. 721 , 107 L.Ed.2d 740 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ottaviani
v.
State University of New York at New Paltz
v.
State University of New York at New Paltz
No. 89-612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1990.
493 U.S. 1021
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.