green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Obas
See Innes v. Dalsheim, 864 F.2d 974, 980 (2d Cir. 1988) (refusing to read ambiguous plea agreement as requiring defendant to waive his right to jury trial in event of breach), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S. Ct. 50 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Karn v. U.S. Department of State
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darlene SPAN; Jerry Span, Defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1470 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard H. Krantz v. Phillip Briggs, Superintendent, Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility, Alaska Department of Corrections
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1470 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Edward E. Allen v. Oregon State
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1470 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abdelkader Helmy, United States of America v. James E. Huffman
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1472-78 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Villeda Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.
See, e.g., Steelworkers v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 865 F.2d 1539, 1545 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989) (finding joint action established by common mission between private employer and local law enforcement officers to violate striker’s rights); Eastman Kodak, 978 F.Supp. at 1091 (conspiracy with Bolivian state judicial actors to keep Plaintiff in detention to extract a settlement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mellon
State v. Howington, 907 S.W.2d at 410 ; see also Innes v. Dal-sheim, 864 F.2d 974, 979 (2d Cir.1988), cert, denied 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 50 , 107 L.Ed.2d 19 (1989); United States v. Giorgi, 840 F.2d at 1026 (“[T]he government must shoulder a greater degree of responsibility for lack of clarity in a plea agreement.”); United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2d at 300 (“[Cjonstitutional ... concerns require holding the Government to a greater degree of responsibility than the defendant ... for imprecisions or ambiguities in plea agreements.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
Section 3 in turn defines an occupational safety and health" standard" as one which "requires conditions, or the adoption or use of one or more practices, means, methods, operations, or processes, reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment." 29 U.S.C. § 652 (8) (1982); see also People v. Chicago Magnet Wire Corp., 126 Ill.2d 356 , 128 Ill.Dec. 517, 520 , 534 N.E.2d 962 , 965 (§ 18 precludes "a State's development and enforcement of `occupational health and safety standards.'") (discussing OSHA preemption of State criminal laws) (citat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morales v. New York
(Id. at 2; see also Morales’s Pro Se Memorandum of Law, dated 7/3/90, at 7-10.) Morales relied on the Second Circuit’s decision in Innes v. Dalsheim, 864 F.2d 974 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 50 , 107 L.Ed.2d 19 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Community Publishers, Inc. v. Donrey Corp.
See also, United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., 866 F.2d 242, 246 (8th Cir.1988) (“The lawfulness of an acquisition turns' on the purchaser’s potential for creating, enhancing, or facilitating the exercise of market power— the ability of one or more firms to raise prices above competitive levels for a significant period of time.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989); Merger Guidelines § 0.1 (“the unifying theme ... is that mergers should not be permitted to create or enhance market' power or to facilitate its exercise”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Julian Delgado
United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 168 (1982); see also United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1471 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 (1989). 6 Here, according to the sentencing transcripts the sentencing judge never informed Delgado that he had a right to appeal his sentence within a specified time period.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dalsheim, Superintendent, Downstate Correctional Facility
v.
Innes
v.
Innes
No. 88-1637.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.