green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“n accused cannot be convicted solely on his uncorroborated extrajudicial admission or confession”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McManus v. Commonwealth
n accused cannot be convicted solely on his uncorroborated extrajudicial admission or confession
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
See State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886 (La.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); State v. Maxey, 527 So.2d 551 (La.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spivey v. Turpin
(2×)
See Spivey v. Kemp, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1797 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Strickland
See State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886, 905-907 (La.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); State v. Messiah, 538 So.2d 175, 189-190 (La.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1063 , 110 S.Ct. 880 , 107 L.Ed.2d 963 (1990); State v. Thompson, 516 So.2d 349, 356-357 (La.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 871 , 109 S.Ct. 180 , 102 L.Ed.2d 149 (1988); State v. Bates, 495 So.2d 1262, 1276-1278 (La.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hattaway
See State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886 (La.1989), cert. denied 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990), reh'g denied 495 U.S. 966 , 110 S.Ct. 2579 , 109 L.Ed.2d 761 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tart
See State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886, 903-904 (La.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rose
See State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886 (La. 1989), cert. denied 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990), dealing with the inability of a prospective juror to grasp the legal issues in a case and State v. McDowell, 582 So.2d 364 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ denied 586 So.2d 567 (La.1991), discussing partiality of a prospective juror sympathetic to the defendant.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Lynch v. Sandahl
See People v. Bribson, 129 Ill.2d 200 , 135 Ill.Dec. 801 , 544 N.E.2d 297 (1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 797 (1990); People v. Stansberry, 47 Ill.2d 541 , 268 N.E.2d 431 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 873 , 92 S.Ct. 121 , 30 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971) (overruled in part, not relevant here, by People v. Laws, 84 Ill.2d 493 , 50 Ill.Dec. 701 , 419 N.E.2d 1150 (1981)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ross
See State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886, 895-896 (La.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Cain
Specific intent is defined as: “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.” La.R.S. 14:10; see also State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886, 902-03 (La.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Frankie E. Casteel
Regarding the admission of tape-recorded conversations, the Tennessee Supreme Court has held that “any statement made by a nontestifying party to the conversation which tends to be prejudicial to the defendant must be redacted, unless admissible under some other rule of law." State v. Jones, 598 S.W.2d 209, 223 (Tenn. 1980); see also State v. Wilcoxson, 772 S.W.2d 33, 38 (Tenn. 1989)(holding that transcripts of conversations were admissible after being redacted significantly to minimize any indication that defendant was willing to engage in criminal activity unrelated to that for which he wa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Durham
See also, State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886 (La.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); State v. Tassin, 536 So.2d 402 (La.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct. 205 , 107 L.Ed.2d 159 (1989). [4] The Witt court further noted that deference must be paid to the trial judge who sees and hears the juror because the trial judge may be left with an impression "that a prospective juror would be unable to faithfully and impartially apply the law" even though such an impression is not evidenced in the printed record.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roach v. Commonwealth
Rejected in Evans v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 766, 770 , 284 S.E.2d 816, 817-18 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1038 (1982); see also Watkins v. Commonwealth, 238 Va. 341, 352 , 385 S.E.2d 50, 56 (1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Guy
Specific intent is defined as: "that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act." La.R.S. 14:10; see also State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886, 902-03 (La.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Young
See, e.g., State v. Lindsey, 543 So.2d 886, 898 (La. 1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1074 , 110 S.Ct. 1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990) (limited education, inability to grasp legal issues); State v. Willis, 552 So.2d 39, 42 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989), writ denied, 560 So.2d 20 (La.1990) (meekness, inattentiveness, possible inability to understand proceedings); State v. Manuel, 517 So.2d 374, 376 (La.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stringer
v.
Black, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
v.
Black, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
No. 88-7000.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1990.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Virginia (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari[*1075] granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, ante, p. 738.