green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.8 score
“in order 1370 to prove an abridgment of the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel based on an allegedly wrongful denial of a continuance, a defendant must first demonstrate that the district court 'abused its discretion' in denying the motion.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bobby Myers, Jr., United States of America v. Jarmal Lamar Myers
in order 1370 to prove an abridgment of the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel based on an allegedly wrongful denial of a continuance, a defendant must first demonstrate that the district court 'abused its discretion' in denying the motion.
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. State
See generally United States v. Herrero , 893 F.2d 1512 , 1525 (7th Cir.), cert. denied , 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mee Sook Sasaki v. Class
(2×)
See United States v. LaRouche, 896 F.2d 815, 829-30 (4th Cir.) (general questions may be sufficient in context), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1996
(2×)
See United States v. LaRouche, 896 F.2d 815, 829-30 (4th Cir.) (general questions may be sufficient in context), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990). 49 Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to ask further questions regarding the prospective jurors' experiences with sexual harassment.
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall v. City of Atlanta (In re Air Terminal Enterprises, Inc.)
See United States v. Alexander, 888 F.2d 777 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 643 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall v. City of Atlanta
See United States v. Alexander, 888 F.2d 777 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 643 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McKinney
See United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1326 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoyte
(2×)
See United States v. Larouche, 896 F.2d 815, 823 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1995
(2×)
See United States v. Larouche, 896 F.2d 815, 823 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990). 27 Hoyte's initial counsel was appointed on May 19, 1993.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Timothy Stewart
See United States v. LaRouche, 896 F.2d 815, 823 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 (1990). 5 Relying on Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), Stewart next maintains that the Government unconstitutionally exercised one of its peremptory challenges to strike a black male from the petit jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Elmer Flenniken, Jr.
United States v. Meitinger, 901 F.2d 27, 29 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 985 (1990); see United States v. Daly, 883 F.2d 313 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 (1990). 4 Accordingly, we affirm Flenniken's conviction and sentence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cortez C. Guyton
See United States v. Herrero, 893 F.2d 1512, 1527 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990); accord United States v. Shoffner, 826 F.2d 619, 628 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 958 , 108 S.Ct. 356 , 98 L.Ed.2d 381 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pirnat
See United States v. Daly, 883 F.2d 313, 316-18 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2622 , 110 L.Ed.2d 643 (1990); see also United States v. Larsen, 904 F.2d 562, 563 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1206 , 111 S.Ct. 2800 , 115 L.Ed.2d 973 (1991); United States v. Elrod, 898 F.2d 60, 61-63 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 835 , 111 S.Ct. 104 , 112 L.Ed.2d 74 (1990); United States v. Bishop, 894 F.2d 981, 985-86 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 498 U.S. 836 , 111 S.Ct. 106 , 112 L.Ed.2d 77 (1990); United States v. Rose, 881 F.2d 386, 388-89 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. T…
cited
Cited "see"
Franks v. State
See generally United States v. Herrero , 893 F.2d 1512 , 1525 (7th Cir.), cert. denied , 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Appraisers Coalition v. Appraisal Institute
(2×)
See Wilk v. American Medical Ass’n, 895 F.2d 352, 359 (7th Cir.1990) (discussing professional associations), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 513 , 112 L.Ed.2d 524 (1990); Phil Tolkan Datsun v. Greater Milwaukee Datsun Dealers’ Advertising Ass’n, 672 F.2d 1280, 1285 (7th Cir. 1982) (discussing trade associations).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy Horton
See United States v. Herrero, 893 F.2d 1512, 1522-24 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 (1990). 7 We note too that Horton effectively cross-examined Dobbs about his origins as a police informer, his prior drug use, and inconsistencies between his grand jury and trial testimony.
cited
Cited "see"
ca4 1993
See United States v. LaRouche, 896 F.2d 815, 823 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edison Electric Institute v. Henwood
See United States v. Alexander, 888 F.2d 777, 778 (11th Cir.1989), cert, denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 643 (1990); United States v. Gelb, 881 F.2d 1155, 1164 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 994 , 110 S.Ct. 544 , 107 L.Ed.2d 541 (1989).
examined
Cited "see"
Braxston L. Banks v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
(4×)
See Wilk v. American Medical Ass’n, 895 F.2d 352, 358 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990) (rule of reason considers “agreements whose competitive effect can only be evaluated by analyzing the facts peculiar to the business involved, the particular restraint’s history, and the reasons it was imposed”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barry Dean Boatner
See United States v. Herrero, 893 F.2d 1512 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990); United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Sandini, 816 F.2d 869 (3d Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Village of Downers Grove
See United States v. Clemmons, 892 F.2d 1153, 1156 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990) (even if prima facie case is otherwise doubtful, the response to a request for a race-neutral explanation may itself establish a prima facie case); United States v. De Gross, 960 F.2d 1433 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc) (trial court properly disallowed strike when a party failed to offer a gender-neutral explanation).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Lewis Rendelman
See United States v. LaRouche, 896 F.2d 815, 823 (4th Cir.) (defendant must demonstrate that district court abused its discretion in denying continuance, and that the denial prejudiced defendant's case), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 (1990). 19 (5) Prison clothing.
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Sanchez
See United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1325 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 2621 (1990) (citing F.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Filemon Sotelo Sanchez, Jose Angel Naegele, and Rebeca Portillo Brito, United States of America v. Ricardo Portillo Brito
See United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1325 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990) (citing F.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ellison v. Conoco, Inc.
See United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1322 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990). (2) Duty Although we conclude that Ellison carried his burden of creating a jury issue on whether the noise of Conoco’s turbine engine caused his injury, we agree with the district court that the duty portion of our analysis is fatal to Ellison’s negligence claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca5 1992
See United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1322 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990). 30 (2) Duty 31 Although we conclude that Ellison carried his burden of creating a jury issue on whether the noise of Conoco's turbine engine caused his injury, we agree with the district court that the duty portion of our analysis is fatal to Ellison's negligence claim. 32 In Louisiana, the existence of a duty is a question of law, and similarly, the question whether a particular risk of harm is included within the scope of a particular duty is a legal issue t…
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Tenakee Springs v. Clough
See Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Mohla, 895 F.2d 627, 629-30 (9th Cir.) (discussing section 314 of the Interior Appropriations Act of 1988, predecessor to section 312 and identical thereto), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Falcon
See, e.g., Ringstaff v. Howard, 885 F.2d 1542, 1543 (11th Cir.1989) (explaining that “[t]he defendant does not have to show actual prejudice by delay ... if the first three Doggett factors weigh heavily against the Government”), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2622 , 110 L.Ed.2d 643 (1990); United States v. Dennard, 722 F.2d 1510, 1513 (11th Cir.1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rezaq
See, e.g., United States v. Herrero, 893 F.2d 1512, 1524-27 (7th Cir.) (ruling that protective order preventing defense counsel from disclosing privileged information to defendant did not violate right to effective assistance of counsel or due process right), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Burns Alexander, McKinley \Jake\" Alexander and Cornelius Thurmond"
United States v. Missick, 875 F.2d 1294, 1297 (7th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Herrero, 893 F.2d 1512, 1534 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 (1990) (sufficient to prove that conspiracy defendant knew its essential nature and intended to associate with its purpose).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Heriberto Ruiz, A/K/A Echeverry, Jorge Marisio-Gonzalez and Valentin Montero
See, e.g., United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1322 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Green
See Fagan, supra; Johnson, supra; see also, United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1325 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 2621 (1990) (citing F.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas D. Green, A/K/A Doug Green
See Fagan, supra; Johnson, supra; see also, United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1325 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990) (citing F.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)).
Gardner
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 89-1753.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.