green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moloney
See United States v. Maez, 915 F.2d 1466, 1468 (10th Cir.1990) (court had “no problem in finding that the Government has sufficient interest in returning property in its possession to the true owner to sustain its participation in the [Rule 41(e)] proceedings, asserting the bank’s ownership” of seized money, notwithstanding fact that bank itself did not contest defendant’s ownership), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1087 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
46 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 240, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 621 United States of America v. Ralph E. Brazel, Jr., Charles Hubbard, Norman L. Burgess, United States of America v. Sharvonne McKinnon United States of America v. Levine Justice Archer, A.K.A. Jamaican Joe, A.K.A. Joe, Willie Jefferson, Marlon McNealy A.K.A. Man
See United States v. Parrado, 911 F.2d 1567, 1571 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991). 22 a.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brazel
See United States v. Parrado, 911 F.2d 1567, 1571 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991). a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lozoya v. State
See United States v. Maez, 915 F.2d 1466, 1468 (10th Cir.1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1087 (1991) (for a plea to be valid it “must be based on the defendant’s intelligent conclusion that the record before the judge contains strong evidence of actual guilt”); United States v. Pollard, 959 F.2d 1011, 1021 (D.C.Cir.), cert, denied, 506 U.S. 915 , 113 S.Ct. 322 , 121 L.Ed.2d 242 (1992) (a plea is acceptable so long as the record contains “adequate evidence of actual guilt”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Sam Early
See United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759, 761 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991); see also United States v. Porter, 14 F.3d 18, 19 (8th Cir.1994) (noting that the defendant, who had signed a form waiving his right to court-appointed counsel, “failed to offer any support for his bare allegation that he waived his constitutional rights unknowingly and involuntarily”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald John Dupard v. P.R. Kringle, Deputy U.S. Marshal Thomas P. Spillane, Deputy U.S. Marshal
See United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712, 717-18 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 (1991) (incarcerated defendant who is represented by counsel has no constitutional right of access to legal materials, and incarcerated defendant who proceeds pro se is not denied his right of access to courts because access to his legal materials is tailored to the perceived needs of prison management); Vigliotto v. Terry, 873 F.2d 1201, 1202-03 (9th Cir.1989) (prisoner's right of access to courts was not denied where prison officials confiscated his material for three days and then gave it to pers…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. $292,888.04 in U.S. Currency, Calvin L. Robinson, Claimant-Appellant
See United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1006 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1991); United States v. Robinson, 12 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir.1993) (appeal after remand), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1102 , 127 L.Ed.2d 414 (1994). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Downin
See United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712 , 714 *1477 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1006 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1991) (right to counsel); United States v. Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d 1070, 1077 (9th Cir.1991) (admissibility of evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rick Paul Springer
See United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712, 714 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1006 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cordero Garcia
(2×)
See United States v. Unger, 915 ___ _____________ _____ F.2d 759, 761 (1st Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 _____ ______ (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cordero Garcia
See United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759, 761 (1st Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth Crandell v. Bill J. Bunnell, Warden Attorney General of California
See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2541 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (criminal defendant has right to waive counsel and represent himself if he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily elects to do so). 11 The first requirement for a valid waiver of counsel is that the "request to forego the assistance of counsel must be unequivocal." United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712, 714 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1006 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Bland, Jr. v. California Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of California
See United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712, 716 (9th Cir.1990) (when defendant requests substitute counsel, court should make formal inquiry into the defendant’s reasons for dissatisfaction with present counsel), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1006 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Falesbork
See United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Merrick Ralph Falesbork, A/K/A Merc, A/K/A Merrick, United States of America v. Clarence Alfred Lindsey, A/K/A Clarence Lindsay, A/K/A Cal, United States of America v. Tyrone Boone, United States of America v. Bobby Louis Turner, A/K/A Robert Louis Turner, A/K/A Bone
See United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Maass
See United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712, 717 (9th Cir.1990) (defendant who is represented by counsel has no constitutional right of access to legal materials), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 (1991); United States v. Wilson, 690 F.2d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.1982) (availability of legal assistance at government expense is a constitutionally permissible means of access), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 867 (1983). 5) Other Claims 14 Although Alexander raised several claims in district court, he raises only four of them on appeal.
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANIEL VILARCHAO
See United States v. Drummond, 910 F.2d 284, 285 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1006 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAIME EDUARDO ALARCON
See United States v. Drummond, 910 F.2d 284, 285 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sarno
We agree that the Sixth Amendment demands that a pro se defendant who is incarcerated be afforded reasonable access to “law books, witnesses, or other tools to prepare a defense.” Milton v. Morris, 767 F.2d 1443, 1446 (9th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712, 717 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1006 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9376, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,355 United States of America v. Anthony C. Sarno and Charles W. Knapp, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Joseph v. Nash
His efforts at self-representation were, however, somewhat encumbered by his status at the time of this trial as a prison inmate serving out a sentence under a prior conviction for falsifying tax documents. 13 He claims here that the resulting constraints upon his time and actions deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to defend himself. 69 We agree that the Sixth Amendment demands that a pro se defendant who is incarcerated be afforded reasonable access to "law books, witnesses, or other tools to prepare a defense." Milton v. Morris, 767 F.2d 1443, 1446 (9th Cir.1985); see also United Stat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hunnewell
(2×)
A(3), & 2; see also United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759, 762-63 (1st Cir.1990) (explaining that the primary purposes of the Sentencing Reform Act are to provide certainty, uniformity, and fairness in sentencing), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Piper
A(3), & 2; see also United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759 , ___ ____ _____________ _____ 762-63 (1st Cir. 1990) (explaining that the primary purposes of the Sentencing Reform Act are to provide certainty, uniformity, and fairness in sentencing), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 (1991). _____ ______ In addition to general guidance, see, e.g., 28 U.S.C. 991(b), ___ ____ Congress also gave the Commission some specific marching orders.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Labonte, United States of America v. David E. Piper, United States of America v. Alfred Lawrence Hunnewell, Stephen Dyer v. United States
A(3), & 2; see also United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759, 762-63 (1st Cir.1990) (explaining that the primary purposes of the Sentencing Reform Act are to provide certainty, uniformity, and fairness in sentencing), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 , 111 S.Ct. 1005 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Virginia Lee Ternes
Compare United States v. Hardeman, 933 F.2d 278, 281 (5th Cir.1991) (suggests "common sense" approach, relying on "all possible factors of similarity, including a comparison of punishments imposed for the listed and unlisted offenses, the perceived seriousness of the offense as indicated by the level of punishment, the elements of the offense, the level of culpability involved, and the degree to which the commission of the offense indicates a likelihood of recurring criminal conduct") with United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759 , 762-63 & n.5 (1st Cir.1990) (court should simply compare the eleme…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fisher
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-6636.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1991.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.