green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“[A] general objection stating no grounds is insufficient under Rule 51.”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David A. Kostelec v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
general objection stating no grounds is insufficient under rule 51.
cited
Cited "see"
BD v. DeBuono
See Zagano v. Fordham Univ., 900 F.2d 12, 14 (2d Cir.1990), aff'd en banc, 900 F.2d 12, 15-16 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmieri v. Defaria
See Zagano v. Fordham Univ., 900 F.2d 12, 15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990) (court may deny plaintiffs motion for voluntary dismissal and then dismiss for failure to prosecute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmieri v. Defaria
See Zagano v. Fordham Univ., 900 F.2d 12, 15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990) (court may deny plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal and then dismiss for failure to prosecute).
cited
Cited "see"
Starks v. Rent-A-Center
See Tinnon v. Burlington N.R.R., 898 F.2d 1340 , 1343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990); Christopherson v. Deere & Co., 941 F.2d 692, 694 (8th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Starks v. Rent-a-Center
See Tinnon v. Burlington N.R.R., 898 F.2d 1340 , 1343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990); Christopherson v. Deere & Co., 941 F.2d 692, 694 (8th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran
(2×)
See also Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F.2d 944 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State Farm Indemnity Co. v. Warrington
See, e.g., Pervis v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 901 FM 944 (11th Cir.1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gonzalez v. Fortune Florida Residential Property & Casualty Joint Underwriters Associates
Co., 622 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 630 So.2d 1101 (Fla.1993); see also Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F.2d 944 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas A. Malcuit
See e.g., United States v. Acosta-Cazares, 878 F.2d 945, 952 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 110 S.Ct. 255 , 107 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989) (“[s]ection 924(c)(1) reaches the possession of a firearm which in any manner facilitates the execution of a felony.” (citation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips Usa, Inc. v. Allflex Usa, Inc., and N.J. Phillips Pty., Limited
See 789 F.2d at 502 (considering “the fact that a motion for summary judgment has been filed by the defendant”); see also Zagano v. Fordham University, 900 F.2d 12, 14 (2d Cir.) (considering the expenses that will be duplicated by a second trial), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mello v. Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance
See also Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F.2d 944, 946-947 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 (1990); Allstate Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles E. Roberts v. George Ross John Sullivan
See Hughes v. Box, 814 F.2d 498, 503 (8th Cir. 1987); see also Tinnon v. Burlington Northern R.R Co., 898 F.2d 1340, 1343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stringer v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
See also Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F.2d 944 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 255 , 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olympic Club v. Those Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Ass’n, 42 Cal.3d 490 , 229 Cal.Rptr. 456, 465 , 723 P.2d 573 (1986); see also Ruocco v. Bateman, Eichler, Hill, Richards, Inc., 903 F.2d 1232, 1240 (9th Cir.) (directors not liable absent evidence that they acted personally or that the decision was not a corporate act), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 254 , 112 L.Ed.2d 212 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olympic Club v. Those Interested Underwriters At Lloyd's London
But their authority to oversee broad areas of corporate activity does not, without more, give rise to a duty of care with regard to third persons who might foreseeably be injured by the corporation's activities. 26 Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Ass'n, 42 Cal.3d 490 , 229 Cal.Rptr. 456, 465 , 723 P.2d 573 (1986); see also Ruocco v. Bateman, Eichler, Hill, Richards, Inc., 903 F.2d 1232, 1240 (9th Cir.) (directors not liable absent evidence that they acted personally or that the decision was not a corporate act), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899 , 111 S.Ct. 254 , 112 L.Ed.2d 212 (1990).
Le Bup Thi Dao
v.
Board of Medical Quality Assurance of California
v.
Board of Medical Quality Assurance of California
No. 90-303.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
498 U.S. 899
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.