green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. NY CITY DIST. COUNCIL
See Ziaee v. Vest, 916 F.2d 1204 (7th Cir. 1990) (holding that in exercise of its discretion district court may consider factors such as number of requests made and number of documents withheld), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991); Garred v. General American Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. New York City District Council of Carpenters' Benefits Funds
See Ziaee v. Vest, 916 F.2d 1204 (7th Cir.1990) (holding that in exercise of its discretion district court may consider factors such as number of requests made and number of documents withheld), cert. de nied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991); Garred v. General American Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dabney
See Blue v. United States Dep’t of Army, 914 F.2d 525, 548 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1580 , 113 L.Ed.2d 645 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corporation v. Dabney
See Blue v. United States Dep't of Army, 914 F.2d 525 , 548 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1580 , 113 L.Ed.2d 645 (1991). 23 Nevertheless, even if it were error for the district court to base its sanction under Sec. 1927 on the time it spent on the discovery dispute, the sanction can be upheld under the court's inherent power to impose a variety of sanctions to regulate its docket, promote judicial efficiency and deter frivolous filings.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Sonies
See Blue v. United States Department of Army, 914 F.2d 525 , 538 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 (1991) (a district court's decision to impose sanctions is entitled to "substantial deference" because a district court "is in the best position to review the factual circumstances and render an informed judgment as [it] is intimately involved with the case, the litigants, and the attorneys on a daily basis").
discussed
Cited "see"
California Cosmetology Coalition v. Riley
See, National Rifle Ass’n v. Brady, 914 F.2d 475 , 480 n. 3 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1580 , 113 L.Ed.2d 645 (1991) (applying Chevron to the Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 923 (d)(1)(E)(i)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pagovich v. Moskowitz
See Ziaee v. Vest, 916 F.2d 1204 (7th Cir.1990) (holding that in exercise of its discretion district court may consider factors such as number of requests made and number of documents withheld), cert. denied 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991); Garred v. General American Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Krawczyk v. Harnischfeger Corp.
See Ziaee v. Vest, 916 F.2d 1204, 1210-11 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp.
Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1336 (2d ed. Supp.2003); see also Blue v. United States Dep’t of the Army (4th Cir.1990) 914 F.2d 525 , 535, cert. denied sub nom., Chambers v. United States Dep’t of the Army (1991) 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1580 , 113 L.Ed.2d 645 (“[Cjlaims that are plainly meritless should be disposed of early in the course of litigation through summary judgment or other pretrial motion[s].. .As a general matter, dismissal of a frivolous... case on the merits should be a first option, whereas imposition of sanctions should be a matter of last resort.”). 6 Hen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard E. Schwartz v. James Kujawa
See e.g., Magnus Elecs., Inc. v. Masco Corp. of Indiana, 871 F.2d 626, 634 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 891 , and Blue v. U.S. Dept. of Army, 914 F.2d 525 , 548 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied sub nom, 499 U.S. 959 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Kujawa (In Re Kujawa)
See e.g., Magnus Elecs., Inc. v. Masco Corp. of Indiana, 871 F.2d 626, 634 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 891 , 110 S.Ct. 237 , 107 L.Ed.2d 188 , and Blue v. U.S. Dept. of Army, 914 F.2d 525, 548 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1580 , 113 L.Ed.2d 645 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacMillan v. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Phila.
See also Ziaee v. Vest, 916 F.2d 1204, 1206-07 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991) (plan provision that “creates discretion over investment strategies [for plan assets] but does not affect the computation of benefits due, given the strategy selected ... give[s] the Administrator power to decide but do[es] not imply discretion to construe,” and the district judge therefore “properly reached his own decision about the plans’ meaning” with respect to amounts plaintiffs were owed for their interests in employer’s two pension plans at the…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Colbert v. Yadkin Valley Telephone Membership Corp.
Id. at 357; compare Blue v. U.S. Dept. of Army, 914 F.2d 525, 533 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom, Chambers v. U.S. Dept. of Army, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1580 , 113 L.Ed.2d 645 (1991) (race).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. E.J. Brach Corp.
See also Ziaee v. Vest, 916 F.2d 1204, 1210 (7th Cir.1990) (“the judge may, but need not, consider the provable injury when exercising the discretion”), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991); Kleinhans, 810 F.2d at 622 (conduct and intent of the administrator in not providing the required information considered).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kwik Care Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., NLRB v. Precise Castings, Inc., 915 F.2d 1160, 1163 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991) (discussing an on-site election, and noting that "Ballots are not always read.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kwik Care Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., NLRB v. Precise Castings, Inc., 915 F.2d 1160, 1163 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991) (discussing an on-site election, and noting that “Ballots are not always read.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sheldon Whitehouse, in His Official Capacity as United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island v. United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Sheldon Whitehouse, in His Official Capacity as United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island v. Supreme Court of Rhode Island, Acting Chief Justice Joseph R. Weisberger, Florence K. Murray, Donald F. Shea, Victoria Lederberg and David D. Curtain, as Acting Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Sheldon Whitehouse, in His Official Capacity as United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island v. United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena for Attorney Representing Criminal Defendant Reyes-Requena, 913 F.2d 1118 (5th Cir.1990) (benefactor payments), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991); In re Grand Jury Subpoenas (Anderson), 906 F.2d 1485 (10th Cir.1990) (same); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe (Slotnick), 781 F.2d 238 (2d Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whitehouse v. United States District Court
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena for Attorney Representing Criminal Defendant Reyes-Requena, 913 F.2d 1118 (5th Cir.1990) (benefactor payments), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 1581 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991); In re Grand Jury Subpoenas (Anderson), 906 F.2d 1485 (10th Cir.1990) (same); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe (Slotnick), 781 F.2d 238 (2d Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitcombe
v.
Weyerhaeuser Corp.
v.
Weyerhaeuser Corp.
No. 90-910.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1991.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.