green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Russ v. United States
See Schneider v. United States, 936 F.2d 956 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992); see also Jimenez-Nieves v. United States, 682 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1982) (suggesting that the tort of misrepresentation is not limited to the commercial context); Mullens v. United States, 785 F.Supp. 216 (D.Me.1992) (applying the misrepresentation exception to a claim involving personal injury); Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 429 F.Supp. 181, 187 (E.D.Tenn.1977) (stating that misrepresentation exception applies to actions involving personal injury); Vaughn v. United …
cited
Cited "see"
Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.
See SEC v. Cherif, 933 F.2d 403, 414 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 966 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
R.J. Wildner Contracting Co. v. Ohio Turnpike Commission
See GAF Corp. v. United States, 932 F.2d 947, 949 (Fed.Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pritchett v. Milstid
See 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (h), see also U.S. v. Neustadt, 366 U.S. 696 , 81 S.Ct. 1294 , 6 L.Ed.2d 614 (1961), and Schneider v. United States, 936 F.2d 966 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, Schneider v. United States, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992) (action on negligent representation in HUD letter of acceptance barred by § 2680(h).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Comcoa Ltd.
See SEC v. Cherif, 933 F.2d 403, 416-17 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 966 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Welfare of S.R.A.
See State v. Larson, 472 N.W.2d 120, 125 (Minn.1991) (admission of statements for the purpose of showing consistency was not in violation of the hearsay rules), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992); Danowit, 497 N.W.2d at 639 (“Any other statements were cumulative, and, if it was error to admit any of them, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rojas
(2×)
See State v. Larson, 472 N.W.2d 120, 126 (Minn.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Welfare of L.E.P.
Minnesota courts have articulated a number of additional factors to consider in evaluating the reliability of out-of-court statements by young children including “the knowledge of the declarant, the motives of the declarant and witnesses to speak truthfully and the proximity in time between the statement and the events described.” State v. Conklin, 444 N.W.2d 268, 276 (Minn.1989); see also State v. Larson, 472 N.W.2d 120, 127 (Minn.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
See, e.g., Schneider v. United States, 936 F.2d 956, 958 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992); Hamre v. United States, 799 F.2d 455 (8th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Madrid v. Gomez
See, e.g., Thompson v. Enomoto, 915 F.2d 1383 , 1387 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1071 , 112 S.Ct. 965 , 117 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992) (Court Monitor reports showed that state prison officials had not complied with decree governing conditions for death row inmates in 1988 and 1989); Gates v. Deukmejian, No. Civ.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Burlington
v.
Dague
v.
Dague
No. 91-810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1992.
502 U.S. 1071
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “May a court, in determining a reasonable attorney’s fee award under § 7002(e) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 90 Stat. 2826, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 6972(e), or § 505(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 86 Stat. 889, as amended, 33 U. S. C. § 1365(d), enhance the fee award above the lodestar amount in order to reflect the fact that the attorneys had taken the case on a contingent-fee basis, thus assuming the risk of receiving no attorney’s fees at all?”