Dunn v. Arizona, 502 U.S. 827 (1991). · Go Syfert
Dunn v. Arizona, 502 U.S. 827 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Checoura (njd, 2001-12-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Checoura
D.N.J. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 595-96 (7th Cir.) (Easterbrook, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Shane Clements
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 592 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (“Every court that has considered the interplay between § 4B1.2 and § 5K2.13 has held that the terms are mutually exclusive, most finding the proposition so obvious that little or no discussion was required.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991); see also United States v. Mayotte, 76 F.3d 887, 889 (8th Cir.1996); United States v. Dailey, 24 F.3d 1323, 1325-26 (11th Cir.1994); United States v. Russell, 917 F.2d 512, 517 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 953 , 111 S.Ct. 1427 , 113 L.Ed.2d…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Woodworth
N.D. Ind. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bernard Wilson, Luis Luna, and Manuel Garcia
7th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590-91 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (holding that a decision not to depart from the Guidelines is reviewable on appeal when it is the result of an erroneous legal conclusion about the court’s authority to depart), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Santos
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Thomas J. Maloney (2×)
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
"This section of RICO is capable of providing for the linkage in one proceeding of a number of otherwise distinct crimes and/or conspiracies through the concept of enterprise conspiracy." United States v. Neapolitan, 791 F.2d 489, 501 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S.Ct. 422 , 93 L.Ed.2d 372 (1986); see United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.) ("The notion of 'enterprise conspiracy' ... has made much of the old distinction between 'single conspiracy' and 'multiple conspiracy' irrelevant to RICO conspiracy charges."), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 1…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jesus S. Covarrubias and Graciela Covarrubias
7th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 591 , (7th Cir.1991) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mobley v. Coleman
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Clifton v. Craig, 924 F.2d 182 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 97 , 116 L.Ed.2d 68 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sam
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588 (7th Cir.1991) (en banc) (§ 5K2.13 categorically prohibits a departure for a crime of violence), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991), with United States v. Chatman, 986 F.2d 1446 (D.C.Cir.1993) (§ 5K2.13 requires courts to look at all facts and circumstances surrounding a defendant’s crime to determine whether it was nonviolent, permitting a departure).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Seke v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Code § 54.1-3415 (authorizing a permitted manufacturer or wholesaler to distribute Schedule II drugs, including cocaine, to specified individuals pursuant to an “official written order”); see also State v. Dunn, 166 Ariz. 506 , 803 P.2d 917, 920 (App.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 94 , 116 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991) (holding that a state law prohibiting the importation of narcotics does not violate the Commerce Clause); Guam v. Salas, No. 82-0061A, 1983 WL 29951 , at *5 (D.Guam App.Div.1983) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dunn
v.
Arizona
No. 90-7769.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
502 U.S. 827
Published

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.